1 / 47

Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress

Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress. Jamie Malone Marty Guthrie U.S. Department of Education. Today’s Agenda. Resources Verification Regulations Federal Register Notice Satisfactory Academic Progress Dear Colleague Letter Questions?. Resources. For information, consult:

yale
Download Presentation

Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Verification and Satisfactory Academic Progress Jamie MaloneMarty GuthrieU.S. Department of Education

  2. Today’s Agenda • Resources • Verification Regulations • Federal Register Notice • Satisfactory Academic Progress • Dear Colleague Letter • Questions?

  3. Resources For information, consult: • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), published 6/18/10 • Describes all changes to current reg • Final Rule, published 10/29/10 • Responds to comments and describes changes to NPRM • Not a comprehensive review of all reg changes

  4. Verification Regulations

  5. Verification • Effective date delayed until July 1, 2012 • 2012-13 award year • Institutions may need time to make changes to their institutional processing systems

  6. Verification: General Changes • Emphasizes updating requirements through change to subpart heading • Removes references to individual programs • Defines “subsidized student financial assistance programs” and “unsubsidized student financial assistance programs”

  7. Verification: General Changes • Subsidized— • Eligibility uses EFC • Verification applies • Pell Grant, FSEOG, FWS, Perkins, Direct Subsidized Loan • Unsubsidized— • Eligibility does not use EFC • Verification does not apply • TEACH Grant, Iraq & Afghanistan Service Grant, Direct Unsubsidized Loan, Direct PLUS Loan

  8. Verification: General Changes • Uses “FAFSA information” instead of “application” • Defines “specified year” as base year or year prior to base year • Allows for option of using income data from a different year • No plans to exercise this option at this time

  9. Verification: General Changes • Must complete verification prior to exercising professional judgment • Codifies long-standing policy in regulations

  10. Verification: Selection • Eliminates 30% limit • Department targeting error-prone items to select applications to verify • Institutions must verify all applicants we select

  11. Verification: Selection • Institutions must continue to resolve conflicting information they believe is inaccurate • Institutions keep flexibility to select additional information or applications for verification

  12. Verification: Exclusions • Removes certain exclusions • Clarifies provisions applicable to— • Applicants • Parents of dependent applicants • Spouses of independent applicants • Lists specific situations when parent’s or spouse’s information is not subject to verification

  13. Verification: Updating • Applicant required to update all changes in dependency status throughout the award year, except changes resulting from a change in the applicant’s marital status • Applicant’s responsibility, not institution’s

  14. Verification: Updating • FAA may require applicant to update marital status to address inequity or to reflect more accurately the applicant’s ability to pay • Documentation not required if the information has not changed during subsequent verification of household size and number in college

  15. Verification: Items to Verify • Annual FederalRegister notice • Items to verify • Documentation • Initially, will include the current five data elements

  16. Verification: Documentation • Specified as acceptable in annual FederalRegister notice • Retained current documentation requirements with technical changes • Added option to retrieve electronic data from IRS

  17. Verification: Documentation • For applicants with tax filing extension • May require completed tax return when filed • Must re-verify AGI and taxes paid, when/if the tax return is submitted

  18. Verification: Documentation • Tax return not signed by the tax filer • Must be signed, typed, printed, or stamped by the tax preparer and • Contain the preparer’s SSN, EIN or PTIN

  19. Verification: Interim Disbursements • Technical and conforming changes • May make a disbursement after completing verification but prior to receiving a corrected valid SAR or valid ISIR if the changes would not change the amount of aid

  20. Verification: Interim Disbursements • To avoid liability, must ensure necessary corrections are submitted to ED • Valid SAR or valid ISIR required before disbursement can be made for all Title IV programs

  21. Verification: Deadlines • Require institutions to follow cash management procedures for Direct Loans • Removed the requirement to pay Pell Grant on the higher EFC

  22. Verification: Fund Recovery • Requires institutions to reimburse program account if disbursement made without receiving corrected valid SAR or ISIR • Requires recovery of overpayments that occur from interim disbursements for students employed under the FWS Program

  23. Verifications: Corrections • Removed $400 tolerance • Require all corrections over $25 to be submitted • Require all corrections of nondollar items

  24. Federal Register Notice

  25. Federal Register Notice • Published Spring/Summer 2011 • Describes 2012-2013 verification items • Outlines acceptable documentation • Lists other verification resources

  26. Satisfactory Academic ProgressRegulations

  27. Satisfactory Academic Progress • Previously, SAP requirements and references were included in 3 regulatory sections • Administrative capability §668.16(e) • Student eligibility §668.32(f) • Satisfactory progress §668.34 • Now all requirements are in §668.34 with cross references in §§668.16(e) and 668.32(f)

  28. SAP: New Regulations New regulations provide— • Continued flexibility for institutions to establish their SAP policies • Additional flexibility for institutions that monitor SAP more often than annually • Definitions for “warning” and “probation” • In general, a student who is not making SAP is no longer eligible for Title IV aid

  29. SAP: Policy Requirements Specified in §668.34 and include— • Measurement of student’s progress at each evaluation— • Can take place each payment period, annually, or less often than each payment period • Must occur at the end of a payment period

  30. SAP: Policy Requirements • GPA that a student must achieve at each evaluation (qualitative standard) • Pace of progression at each evaluation (quantitative standard)

  31. SAP: Details on Standards • Qualitative standard: required GPA • For programs more than 2 academic years: at the end of 2 years, at least a 2.0 or academic standing consistent with requirements for graduation • Quantitative standard: pace at which a student must progress to complete within the maximum timeframe • Calculate by dividing cumulative successfully completed hours by cumulative hours attempted

  32. SAP: Policy Requirements • How student’s GPA and pace are affected by incompletes, withdrawals, repetitions, or transfers of credits • Must count transfer hours accepted toward completion of the student’s program as both hours attempted and hours completed

  33. SAP: Defined Terms • Must incorporate the terminology used in these regulations • Must explain terms and use consistently with these regulations • Must make sure conditions of each term are clear to students

  34. SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Financial Aid Warning • Status assigned to a student who fails to make SAP at an institution that evaluates SAP at the end of each payment period • Student may continue to receive Title IV aid for one payment period • No appeal necessary

  35. SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Financial Aid Probation • Status assigned by an institution to a student who fails to make SAP, who has appealed, and has had eligibility for Title IV aid reinstated • May impose conditions for student’s continued eligibility to receive Title IV aid

  36. SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Maximum timeframe • For an undergraduate program—basically 150% of the published length of the program • For a graduate program—a period defined by the institution that is based on the length of the educational program

  37. SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Appeal • Process by which a student who is not meeting an institution’s SAP policy petitions the institution for reconsideration of the student’s eligibility for Title IV aid

  38. SAP: Defined Terms Defined Term: Appeal (more) • Must specify the conditions under which a student may appeal including— • Why the student failed to make SAP; and • What has changed that will allow the student to make SAP at the next evaluation

  39. SAP: Frequency of Review • Regulations are organized by frequency of SAP evaluation— • At the end of each payment period, or • Less frequently

  40. SAP: Payment Period Review Evaluating at each payment period: If student fails to make SAP, student— • Loses eligibility for Title IV aid • May be placed on Financial Aid Warning for one payment period • Must make SAP or may be placed on Financial Aid Probation after a successful appeal

  41. SAP: Payment Period Review Evaluating SAP each payment period (more) • After Financial Aid Probation, student— • Must be making SAP, or • Must be successfully following an academic plan

  42. SAP: Academic Plans About academic plans— • Not regulated • General or specific • Flexibility to address student situation • Appeal needed to implement or change

  43. SAP: Annual Review Evaluating less frequently: If student fails to make SAP, student— • Loses eligibility for Title IV aid • May be placed on Financial Aid Probation after an appeal • After Financial Aid Probation, must be making SAP or successfully following an academic plan

  44. SAP: Notifications Notifications • Results of SAP review that impact the student’s eligibility for Title IV aid • Specific elements required to appeal SAP, if appeal process is used • Process for reestablishing eligibility for Title IV aid, if no appeal process is used

  45. SAP: Questions People asked about… • Using different rates of assessment for different classes of students • Evaluating one factor at end of each payment period and another annually • Implementing SAP for the 2011 summer crossover payment period

  46. SAP Dear Colleague Letter • Expected in summer 2011 • Will include questions and answers clarifying the SAP provisions in the 10/29/10 regulations

  47. Contact Information • We welcome your feedback. You may contact us at: • Phone: 312-730-1528 • Email: Jamie.Malone@ed.gov • Fax: 312-730-1520 • Phone: 202-219-7031 • Email: Marty.Guthrie@ed.gov • Fax: 202-502-7874

More Related