1 / 19

Week 1: An Overview of Welfare & Industrial Economics

Week 1: An Overview of Welfare & Industrial Economics. Francis O'Toole (fotoole@tcd.ie) Department of Economics Trinity College Dublin 30 th September 2011. Economics: Fundamentals. Economics: Scarcity and Choice Scarcity: Wants > Resources (Needs < Resources?)

yale
Download Presentation

Week 1: An Overview of Welfare & Industrial Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 1: An Overview of Welfare & Industrial Economics Francis O'Toole (fotoole@tcd.ie) Department of Economics Trinity College Dublin 30th September 2011

  2. Economics: Fundamentals • Economics: Scarcity and Choice • Scarcity: Wants > Resources (Needs < Resources?) • Choice: Optimising Behaviour, Cost-Benefit Analysis • Incentives and Institutions • Neo-Classical Perspective (self-interested individuals, rational or at least rationally irrational) • Broad (political economy) • Narrow (consumers and producers + some government)

  3. Economic Agents & Models • Consumers (Individuals or Households?) • Firms (Suppliers/Producers) • Government(s) (Ireland, EU?, USA, … ) • Agencies (e.g. Competition Authority, ComReg, CER, Department, … ) • Consumers maximise happiness (utility, satisfaction) subject to income constraint • Firms maximise profit (subject to cost environment) • Government(s) maximise ? • Agencies maximise ? • Economics, Political Economy, Public Choice ≠ Public Finance

  4. Economics: Demand & Consumer Surplus • Individual Consumer Demand • Quantity Demanded = F(P, Psub, Pcom, Y, Taste, …) • Market Demand = Individual Demands • Consumer Surplus = Willingness to Pay – Price • Consumer Surplus = “Value” – Price

  5. Economics: Supply • Individual Firm Supply • Quantity Supplied = F(P, Pother, w, r, …) • Market Supply = Individual Supplies • Economic Profits = Revenue – (Economic) Costs • Economic Profits ≠ Accounting Profits • Producer Surplus = Revenue – Total Variable Costs • Long Run: Economic Profits = Producer Surplus

  6. Economics: Societal Welfare • Consumer Surplus + • Producer Surplus = • Societal Welfare • Income Distribution (in “background” at least)

  7. Price Determination & Elasticity • Quantity Demanded = Quantity Supplied • Own-Price Elasticity of Demand (e.g. market power?) • Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand (e.g. substitutes and market definition) • Income Elasticity of Demand • (Own-Price) Elasticity of Supply

  8. Firm’s Costs: Short Run • Short Run: At least one input is fixed • Diminishing Marginal Product/Returns • Total Costs (TC), Average Costs (AC) • Fixed Costs (FC), Average Fixed Costs (AFC) • Variable Costs (VC), Average Variable Costs (AVC) (e.g. predatory pricing) • Marginal Costs (MC): Link to Supply Curve (e.g. predatory pricing)

  9. Firm’s Costs: Long run • Long Run: All inputs are variable (TC = VC) • Shape of Average Cost Curve? Increasing Returns to Scale Decreasing Returns to Scale Constant Returns to Scale

  10. Market Structure • Perfect Competition • Monopoly • Oligopoly, Monopolistic Competition, Imperfect Competition • Contestable Markets • Effective/Workable Competition • Structure  Conduct  Performance (SCP)? • Game Theory • Empirical Industrial Organisation

  11. Perfect Competition: Assumptions • Large number of sellers and buyers • Homogeneous product • Free entry and exit • Full information about demand and supply • Profit Maximisation (MR = MC)

  12. Perfect Competition: Characteristics • Short Run: Profits/Losses possible • Long Run: Entry or Exit until Zero Economic (Excess, Supernormal, Abnormal) Profits • Allocative Efficiency: P (SMB) = MC (SMC) • Productive Efficiency: P = Min AC

  13. Monopoly: Assumptions • One seller, large number of buyers • Homogeneous product (by definition) • Barriers to resource transfers • Full information about demand and supply • Profit Maximisation (MR = MC)

  14. Monopoly: Characteristics • Short Run: Profits/Losses possible • Long Run: Economic Profits (subsidised losses) possible • Allocative Inefficiency: P (SMB) > MC (SMC) • Productive Inefficiency: P > Min AC (generally) • X-Inefficiency? (minimise costs?) • Natural Monopoly (can’t compare with competition) → regulation (narrow sense) • Deadweight Loss: Harberger Triangle • R & D, Profit Motivation

  15. Oligopoly: Assumptions • Few sellers, large number of buyers • Homogeneous or heterogeneous product • Free entry or barriers to entry • Full information about demand and supply (usually) • Aside: Monopolistic Competition = Oligopoly with Heterogeneous + Free Entry

  16. Oligopoly: Characteristics? • Cournot (1838): Quantity Competition • Bertrand (1883): Price Competition • Game Theory • Cournot: Assumptions? Results • Bertrand: Assumptions Results? • Repeated Games  ???

  17. Contestable Markets: Assumptions & Outcome • Free entry and exit: No sunk costs • Some price rigidity (e.g. menu costs) or lags relative to entry lag • Perfectly competitive outcome: potential use of hit-and-run strategy (even when n = 1) • Policy Relevance?

  18. Effective/Workable Competition: Assumptions/Characteristics • No “harmful” inhibitions on entry and exit • No “harmful” product differentiation • No “harmful” coordination (e.g. price collusion) • No “harmful” price discrimination • Intrabrand competition, Interbrand competition, potential competition • No Excess (Economic) Profits

  19. Effective/Workable Competition: Assumptions/Characteristics • “To determine whether any industry is workably competitive, therefore, simply have a good graduate student write his dissertation on the industry and render a verdict. It is crucial, of course, that no second graduate be allowed to study the industry.” (Stigler 1956) • Round & Siegfried (1994) Update?

More Related