290 likes | 419 Views
Evaluating The Effectiveness of your Multi-Channel Service delivery Initiative. Ottawa, February 11, 2003. Service Quality Support. SNB Service Quality Model Evaluating and consulting on: Service expectations Service engineering Quality assurance activities
E N D
Evaluating The Effectiveness of your Multi-Channel Service delivery Initiative Ottawa, February 11, 2003 Service Quality Support
SNB Service Quality Model Evaluating and consulting on: Service expectations Service engineering Quality assurance activities Customer satisfaction Questions Content
Customers want / SNB wants: • Clear path through the maze • No “wrong door” for service • Timeliness, fairness, competence and courtesy
SNB Service Centres 36 offices 35 communities Wide range in scale SNB Online(www.snb.ca) WWW Applications (vehicle renewal, e-forms, service packaging etc.) PLANET Driver Abstract Service (ACOL) Business Registry Corporate Affairs online Our Service Network • SNB Teleservices • Dalhousie • (opened June 1997) • 24 Agent stations • 75 Hours a week
Goal - most services over all channels Same fulfillment regime Inter-connected service support Same web application Channel Integration
SNB Service Quality Model Identify customer service needs and expectations Benchmark & standards are defined with customers, business partners & staff Projects, training and process improvement prioritized and managed Results of analysis fed to organization Results & benchmarks measured
Customer Service Model Define benchmark/ standards with customers, business partners & staff Identify customer service needs and expectations Projects, training and process improvement prioritized and managed Measure results & benchmark Feed organization with analysis of results
Service Expectations– Canada vs New Brunswick – Email Telephone In-Person
Internet In-Person / Phone Timeliness Knowledge /Competence Extra Mile / Extra Smile Fairness Outcome Easy to Find Service Outcome Visual Appeal Complete Information Drivers of Satisfaction We have a better understanding of what drives satisfaction
Developing customer service standards Service engineering Quality assurance activities Customer satisfaction Consultation & Evaluation Subjects
Establishing Service Standards • Nine focus groups reviewing customer service standards with staff and customers(Web, Teleservices and OTC) • E-mail survey for ESD customers (twice a year) • Driver Examiner service standards consultations currently underway.
Customer input: Before implementation of new products or services Changes to a current product or service for all three channels. For example: Review of the web portal page (look and feel). customers on electronic audio revision. Service Engineering
Press 1, Registrations, Licences and Permits Press 2, Inquiries and Application Forms Press 1, English Press 3, Payments and Change of Address Press *, To repeat this information Example of EA Revision
Customers want / SNB wants: • Clear path through the maze • No “wrong door” for service • Timeliness, fairness, competence and courtesy
Support for Better Integration/One-Stop Shop for Government Services % of respondents n=1,448 (unweighted), national average citizens only n=1,871 (weighted)
Importance of First Contact? First contact appears to have a significant impact on satisfaction... Source: IPAC-2001
Service Outcome - First Contact n=1,448 (unweighted), national average citizens n=1,871 (weighted), national average total n=3,792 (weighted)
Overall, the most important output is Customer Satisfaction Results
Overall Satisfaction with Service Received n=1,448 (unweighted), national average citizens n=1,871(weighted), national average total n=3,792 (weighted)
Mean of Satisfaction -Quality of service-
Customer Opinion About Future Directions - Selected Issues n=1,448 (unweighted), national average citizens only n=1,871 (weighted)
SNB Service Quality Model Identify customer service needs and expectations Benchmark & standards are defined with customers, business partners & staff Projects, training and process improvement prioritized and managed Results of analysis fed to organization Results & benchmarks measured