1 / 38

Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI

Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI. Ismail Al-Hadhrami AE – Structural Option. Presentation Outline. (1) Existing Building Background (2) Structural Systems - Gravity System - Lateral System (3) Proposed Thesis (4) Structural Design (5) Construction Management

yanka
Download Presentation

Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Agricultural Hall and AnnexEasting Lansing, MI Ismail Al-Hadhrami AE – Structural Option

  2. Presentation Outline (1) Existing Building Background (2) Structural Systems - Gravity System - Lateral System (3) Proposed Thesis (4) Structural Design (5) Construction Management (6) Conclusion Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  3. Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option Project Team (1) Owner - Michigan State University (2) Architect - SmithGroup (3) Structural Engineer - SmithGroup (6) Project Manager - SmithGroup (5) MEP Engineer - SmithGroup

  4. Building Location • Michigan State University Campus Existing Building Agricultural Hall and Annex North Kedzie Hall www.msu.edu Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  5. Building Information • Designed to be five-story with penthouse • Three floors have been built • 1000 SQ FT/Floor • Use – office building Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  6. Structural Systems • Gravity System - Cast-in-place one-way joist - 30” and 20” clear spans - Joist depth = 16” deep + 4.5” slab - Girders depth = 27.5” + 4.5” slab • Columns - 24” x 24” Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  7. Structural System • Lateral System - Seismic Loads govern - Concrete Moment Frames Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  8. Proposal • Building Design Codes Comparison • US Standards vs. British Standards • Focus - Gravity Loads - Loads Combinations - Wind Design Procedures • Gravity Systems (US Standards) - Wide-Module One-way Joist System - Flat Slab - Composite Steel with Composite Deck - East Lansing, MI • Gravity Systems (British Systems) - Flat Slab - Two-way Slab with Interior Beams - Muscat, Oman • Lateral System - Concrete moment frames for concrete structures - Moment frames and braced frames for steel structure • Cost and Time Comparison Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  9. Design Codes • US - ACI 318-02 - IBC 2003 -ASCE 7-02 • British -BS 8110 -Reinforced Concrete Building Examples based on BS 8110 Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  10. US Codes vs. British Codes • Gravity Loads Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  11. US Codes vs. British Codes (cont.) • Loads Combinations Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  12. US Codes vs. British Codes (cont.) • Wind Design Procedure Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  13. US Codes vs. British Codes (cont.) • Wind Design Procedure (cont.) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  14. Design of Gravity Systems • Wide Module One-way Skip Joist -US • CRSI 2002 • Design Criteria - Girders depth = joists depth - T-Beams requirements apply - Minimum cover = 1 ½ in - Design shear strength = 2Φ √f’c bw d - Minimum shear reinforcement =50 (bws)/ fy Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  15. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Wide Module One-way Skip Joist US (cont.) • Design Result - 66” Forms + 6” Ribs @ 72 c-c - depth = 24.5 in (20” Deep Rib + 4.5” Top Slab) - Concrete quantity = 83 psf Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  16. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Wide Module One-way Skip Joist US (cont.) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  17. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Design Criteria • Equivalent Frame Method • ADOSS Software Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  18. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Flat Slab with Drop Panels –US • Design Results Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  19. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Flat Slab with Drop Panels –British Stand. • Design Results Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  20. Design of Gravity Systems (cont.) • Two-way Slab with Beams – British Stand. • Design Results Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  21. Lateral System • Seismic controls • Concrete Moment Frames • SAP 2000 Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  22. Lateral System (cont.) • Frame Design Considerations: • 1 – Same Size Columns • 2- Constant dimensions • 3- 4% Concrete/Steel reinforcement ratio • 4- Drift was set to not to exceed L/400 • 8- 5% percent of building width was included to account for torsional • effect Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  23. Lateral System (cont.) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  24. Lateral System (cont.) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  25. Lateral System (cont.) • Design Result Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  26. Steel Structure • Framing System - Composite steel with composite metal Deck - Beams are spaced 5’ O.C. • Lateral System - Braced Frames around stairwells (Chevron, ) - Braced Frames around Elevator shaft (X) - Moment Frames around the perimeter Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  27. Steel Structure (cont.) • Typical Floor Plan Added columns Braced frames Braced Frames Moment Frames Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  28. Steel Structure (cont.) • Braced and Moment Frames Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  29. Steel Structure (cont.) • Design Results Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  30. Steel Structure (cont.) • Design Results (cont) W14 x 82 W 14 x 43 W 8 x 10 Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  31. Steel Structure (cont.) • Stress Design Check (Interaction Eq.) 0.8 – 0.89 Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  32. Construction Management • RSMeans 2005 • ICE 2000 • MC2 • Modification Factor =0.96 Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  33. Construction Management (cont.) System Comparison ( Concrete Structures) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  34. Construction Management (cont.) System Comparison ( Concrete vs. Steel) Agricultural Hall and Annex Ismail Al-Hadhrami-Structural Option

  35. Conclusion • US Standards - Concrete vs. Concrete -Wide Module One-way Joist - Concrete vs. Steel - Composite Steel with Composite Metal Deck

  36. Conclusion (cont.) • British Standards - Concrete vs. Concrete -Two-way with interior Beams

  37. Acknowledgment • Professor K. Parfitt – Special Thanks • Dr. Ali Memari • Dr. L. Hanagan • Dr. T. Boothby • Mr. Masoud Al-Hashimi • Mr. Ammar Mohammed • Gary Strand • John McCarthy • Selim Ercan • Pat Hopple • Darren Howard • Joe Chan • John Hill

  38. Questions?

More Related