280 likes | 448 Views
Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs. Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek Doelman TNO Science and Industry Raluca Marinica and Michel Verhaegen Delft Center for Systems and Control. Outline.
E N D
Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory NiekDoelman TNO Science and Industry RalucaMarinica and Michel Verhaegen Delft Center for Systems and Control
Outline • Scope: real-time WF sensing for XAO at ELTs • Why to investigate new wavefront sensing methods? • Issues with roof sensor • Fast & Furious • A new focal plane wavefront sensing algorithm • Brief introduction & current status
Issues with roof sensor • Requirements for EPICS XAO WFS driven by the need for very high contrast • A possible option is a roof-sensor Detailed simulations: see (Korkiakoski et al 2010)
Issues with roof sensor • Fulfills the requirements, but has some challenges: • Nonlinearity • Fast WF reconstruction still to be solved • Should we fix the nonlinearity by modulation? NO! Residual WF (6 λ/D mod) RS measurement (modulation 6 λ/D)
Issues with roof sensor • The performance does not scale as you expect • Spiders & windshake at E-ELT + nonlinear sensor can cause unexpected results Residual WF (6 λ/D mod) RS measurement (modulation 6 λ/D)
Issues with roof sensor • Traditional WF reconstruction requires a command matrix having a size of 55000 x 30000 • Fast reconstruction requires approximations • So far, no detailed performance comparisons have been shown Zonal interaction matrix: 3% non-zero elements Command matrix: 0% non-zero elements
Fast & Furious • We have been studying an alternative wavefront sensing option: no WFS at all AO residual < 1 rad rms Corrected WF DM Focal plane Science camera DM commands Images WF estimates Control & DM fitting Fast & Furious algorithm
Fast & Furious • How does F&F differ from other focal plane methods? • Linear approximation • Cut down the complexity • Use of pupil symmetries & phase diversity • Extremely fast + smaller role for the diversity • Iterative WF correction • Applicable to systems with a deformable mirror
Fast & Furious • All the needed pieces have been around, we combine earlier results • Small-phase solution (Gonsalves 2002) • Approximate complex amplitudes linear function of WF • Use the symmetry properties of pupil • Much of the WF information can be obtained from a single PSF measurement, use diversity for the rest • Iterative phase-diversity • Use the adaptive optics DM change as a diversity(Gonsalves 2010)
Fast & Furious: principle An example: consider a sinusoidal wavefront Wavefront (rad) See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle An example: consider a sinusoidal wavefront Wavefront (rad) Measured PSF See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle An example: consider a sinusoidal wavefront Wavefront (rad) Measured PSF ?? See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle The main lobe and 1st side lobes are accurately modeled by a linear approximation Measured PSF See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Measured PSF The lobes further have a negligible contribution to the PSF
Fast & Furious: principle The main lobe and 1st side lobes are accurately modeled by a linear approximation Measured PSF Pay attention to the conservation of the energy! The lobes further have a negligible contribution to the PSF See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle The next idea: use symmetry The pupil function is symmetric. Can use make use of that? Measured PSF See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle The next idea: use symmetry Even PSF component Measured PSF Odd PSF component See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle Even PSF component Also the wavefront can be broken to odd and even parts: Odd PSF component How do the odd/even PSF parts relate to odd/even WF parts?
Fast & Furious: principle The odd WF part can be reconstructed by a single FFT using the odd PSF Odd PSF component 1 FFT See the math at (Keller et al 2012), (Korkiakoski et al 2012)
Fast & Furious: principle Even WF is more tricky: using even PSF, we get only absolute values of the even WF in Fourier space. For the sign, use phase diversity. 2 FFTs Even PSF, Previous Applied DM correction New odd PSF New even PSF
Fast & Furious: principle The real FFTs can be combined. In total, we need 2 complex FFTs. The other can be replaced by a small-kernel convolution. 2 FFTs Even PSF, Previous Applied DM correction New odd PSF New even PSF
Fast & Furious: computation • Conventional reconstruction: O(N2), depends on the actuator & subaperturecount • Fast & Furious: O(N log N), depends on valid detector area • Can be implemented at an EPICS scale with current technology
Fast & Furious: results • The algorithm has been experimentally verified • Low order correction (DM 37 actuators) • Static phase: correct only non-common path aberrations • See (Korkiakoski et al 2012), (Keller et al 2012) The recorded PSF with F&F SR: 0.79 SR: 0.36 SR: 0.3 SR: 0.66 SR: 0.80
Fast & Furious: results • The performance exactly matches the simulations Required convergence time as a function of noise SR: 0.79 SR: 0.36 SR: 0.3 SR: 0.66 SR: 0.80
Fast & Furious: summary • Challenges • Cannot deal with WF errors > 1 rad rms • Atmospheric evolution can cause problems • Works only with monochromatic light • Future developments • Dealing with coronagraphs / camera saturation • Experimental validation with high-order modes (SLM tests at Leiden Observatory, HOT at ESO, FFREE at IPAG)
Issues with roof sensor • Are there simple ways for fast WF reconstruction for non-modulated roof sensor? Signal measured when an actuator pushed