210 likes | 448 Views
From Static to Dynamic:. Choosing and Implementing a CMS. Ruth Kneale, rkneale@nso.edu National Solar Observatory, Advanced Technology Solar Telescope. What’s a CMS anyway?. CMS = Content Management System
E N D
From Static to Dynamic: Choosing and Implementing a CMS Ruth Kneale, rkneale@nso.edu National Solar Observatory, Advanced Technology Solar Telescope
What’s a CMS anyway? • CMS = Content Management System • Used to collaboratively and interactively create, manage, control, and publish information • Known by many other terms • PDM or EDMS, like DocuShare • Web CMS, like Drupal • Wiki • We need a web CMS
Why do we want one? • To avoid any more of the “single point syndrome” • To enable: • Ease of administration • Increased team collaboration • Increased functionality • Improved presentation for the web site
Our Basic Starting Point • Open Source = $0 cost • LAMP Setup
Must Haves • Audit trail • Content approval • WYSIWYG editor • Granular privileges • Friendly URLs • Versioning • Content reuse • CGI support
Should Haves • Sandbox/staging area • Online administration • Inline administration • Mass uploading • Site map/index
Nice to Have • Contact management • Drag-n-drop • Photo gallery • Events calendar • Web statistics
To CMS or to Wiki? • That is the question • Both are strong possibilities • How to determine? • Experience of others (listservs, etc) • Cmsmatrix.org and wikimatrix.org • Opensourcecms.com • Experts-Exchange.com • Local evaluation
WebCMS’s: Lenya Drupal e107 eTouch ExpressionEngine Joomla! Plone WebGUI Xoops Wiki’s: Giki KeheiWiki MediaWiki MoniWiki PHPwiki PmWiki PukiWiki SnipSnap TWiki Initial Search Results
The Weeding Begins • Exclusions based on: • Too many missing functionalities • Hidden fees • Currency of support • Required database underpinnings • Reports of others on ease of installation • Reports of others on ease of use • Short evaluation on opensourcecms
The Final Four Drupal TWiki WebGUI MediaWiki These were installed and tested locally.
Local Testing • Small group of local users made up of staff who would also be final users of the product • Created, edited content • Provided feedback
General Thoughts • Wanted familiar look-and-feel • Wanted terminology changed • Liked the CMSs • “More like Word” • Disliked the wikis • “Too much work”
Next Steps • Expanding functionality • Ingesting existing site • Training staff on use • Going live on new server by 2008
Thanks for Listening! http://atst.nso.edu (after January 1st)