640 likes | 777 Views
Better, Cheaper, Faster Board-CEO Partnership for Change. Ellen Chaffee, AGB Fellow and President Emerita , Valley City State University (slides 1-38) Rick Staisloff, Vice President for Finance And Administration, College of Notre Dame of Maryland (slides 39-60)
E N D
Better, Cheaper, FasterBoard-CEO Partnership for Change Ellen Chaffee, AGB Fellow and President Emerita, Valley City State University (slides 1-38) Rick Staisloff, Vice President for Finance And Administration, College of Notre Dame of Maryland (slides 39-60) ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNING BOARDS NATIONAL CONFERENCE, ORLANDO, 2010
Goals for the Workshop • Understand strategic finance as a context for achieving long-term institutional sustainability • Learn new strategies and tools for dealing with current challenges
Agenda Changing Landscape in Higher Education A Strategic Finance Approach Reducing Cost and Increasing Productivity Break Strategic Finance: CFO Perspective New Tools for New Decisions Wrap Up
The Changing Landscape of Higher Education We CANNOT do What we MUST do If we KEEP doing What we USUALLY do
What we MUST do “By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduatesin the world” - President Obama, 2/24/09
And there’s consensus on that To increase the percentage of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025 Currently: 39% Lumina Foundation for Education
Knowledge-Economy Work Force College Degree
Recent Revenue/Expense Trends • Expenditure per student : 1-2% above CPI • State funding: 3% • Tuition: 3% above CPI • Student aid: 4%
Our Business Model is Not Sustainable Tuition Expend/FTE State Approp CPI
State Financials: Gaps could approach 7% of spending - “The Lost Decade” of state funding * Source: Don Boyd (Rockefeller Institute of Government), 2009
We cannot go on this way HITTING HOME: Quality, Cost, and Access Challenges Confronting Higher Education Today, Travis Reindl, www.makingopportunityaffordable.org
Board-President Relations in Times of Change • Find common ground on how much/what kind of change. Trust AND verify, both ways. Early and often. • Keep roles clear and support each other. • Define the North Star and navigate by it.
Brainstorm • Is your university feeling these pressures? • What are some of the barriers to dealing with them?
What is Strategic Finance? Strategic finance is aligning financial decisions —regarding revenues, creating and maintaining institutional assets, and using those assets— with the institution's mission and strategic plan.
In graphic terms… Mission Strategic Plan Financial Decisions
The New Bottom Lines What’s the cost/benefit of improvement in this? YES What’s the cost/benefit of improvement in this? What’s the cost/benefit of improvement in this?
Strategic Goals (Mission, Market) Importance of ALIGNMENT and Tracking Progress Communication Information Analysis Course Correction
Strategic Indicators (North Star Proxies)(examples) • More students • Enrollment growth by in/out of state • Affordability • Net tuition/median household income • Total financial aid/Total tuition revenue • Accessibility • Enrollment growth by race, income, transfer status • Efficiency • Cost per SCH by program, by site, by delivery • Effectiveness • Retention and graduation rates
Removing the brick wall College Degree More graduates Accessible Affordable Efficient Effective
Current Institutional Responses • Increase efficiency • Increase administrative productivity • Leverage stimulus money • APLU survey just out: “The survey results indicate that "universities are striving to protect the core education mission of their institutions.” What’s missing from this picture?
Missing in Action? • Progress to strategic goals • Growth • Quality improvement • Academic productivity • Innovation • Development of a sustainable business model David Wiley, BYU, http://davidwiley.org/
What do institutions need? • Growth by substitution • Greater cost containment • Greater productivity • Clear expectations • Innovation • LEADERSHIP $
Roaring Out of Recession Companies that recovered well from past recessions: • Used multi-faceted strategies that were highly customized to their own circumstances • Focused on operating efficiency, market development, and asset development • Reduced employee numbers as little as possible • Continued to invest in asset development, marketing, and new product/ market development RanjayGulati, NitinNoharia, and Franz Wohlgezogin, “Roaring out of Recession,” Harvard Business Review, March 2010.
Cost Effective: Cost Reductions + Productivity From paying $1 for X To paying $0.75 for X From paying $1 for X To paying $1 for X + 2 X *
Examples of Cost Reductions • Reduce high cost/low demand programs • Address retirement eligibility • Reduce growth in health care cost • Consolidate administrative functions • Reduce spending on non-revenue producing athletics • Restructure debt • Restructure faculty compensation and rewards (use turnover to substitute teaching faculty for research faculty) Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
Examples of Productivity Improvements • Increase in student retention and graduation • Reduce excess credits for the degree • Increase credit-by-exam • Increase distance-based learning programs • Increase proportion of graduates who meet goals for critical learning • Increase proportion of students who remain – and are employed – in state Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
Building Cost-Effective Institutions • Reduce administrative costs • Tackle ‘automatic’ cost increases • Reengineer curricula • Reengineer course delivery • Eliminate, innovate, or consolidate high cost/low demand programs Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
Learning Productivity • Students come to college fully prepared (no remediation) • Accelerated learning • Minimize “rework” and reduce credits to degree • Improve rates of course completion • Encourage use of assessment/”test out” options • Learning in the workplace/credit for experience Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
Improving Affordability & Choices • Commit to average undergraduate tuition growth no more than CPI, with increased need-based aid • Allow differential tuitions for high cost/demand programs • Experiment with low priced options • Greater on-campus employment opportunities for students • Reduce time to degree Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
Implications for Leaders • Re-imagine your business model to create long-term sustainability • Support change in approach to budget building • Examine old habits and conventional wisdom about costs • Focus on big picture, and progress on achieving strategic goals • Commit to institutional innovation • Examine long-term implications of current decisions Strategies for Tough Times, Dennis Jones and Jane Wellman, November 19, 2009
From Steve Jobs to YOUR Job • 20th Century was one of technological innovation • 21st Century must be one of institutional innovation David Wiley, BYU, http://davidwiley.org/
Speed Dating – Strategic Finance Around the table, 1 minute each: Give an example of an effective change (at your institution or another) that represents a strategic finance perspective
Magic Formula Mission + Market + Margin = Success
“Tried and True” Reporting • Budget to Actual • Quarterly • Year over Year Comparison • Projections • Multi Year Rolling Budgets • Financial Statements • Quarterly • Audit • Annual • Focus must be on what the numbers mean, more than on the numbers themselves
Financial Ratios • Build off of the audit • What are the numbers telling us? • Debt Rating • Central Question – Are we financially healthier this year than last?
Strategic Indicators Strategic Indicators - Measures institutional performance in key areas How do you know if you have the right ones? Focus on important issues Impact decision making Understandable Come from available data Must have trend, benchmark, and target Few in number Peer Group vs. Competitors Importance of Telling the Story
Dashboard Indicators – Notre Dame Enrollment by Program – HC and FTE Matriculation Graduation Rate Diversity Tuition Discount Student Faculty/Student Staff Ratio Rev. and Exp. by Source Cost per FTE Age of Facility/Deferred Main. Participation in Annual Fund Endowment per FTE
Is This a Strategic Finance View? • Importance of the “Reality Check” – Where are we right now? • However, these tools are backward looking • New tools are needed for us to look forward and to act strategically • Shift from input focus to output focus
Activity Drivers Other 9 Programs = 11% Top 12 programs account for89% of credit hours CHM Each 2%or < HIS CST PHY PED ART MUS POL HSV Math 667 3% Core 8 Programs = 32% Psychology 786 4% 798 4% Philosophy 799 4% Modern Foreign Language 813 4% CommunicationArts 861 4% English 873 4% ReligiousStudies Anchor 4 Programs= 57% 4% 904 Biology 1,227 6% Nursing 1,330 7% Pharmacy 1,903 9% Business 35% 6,991 Education 47
Demand – What Do People Want? 90% of prospects originate from the top 12 majors Median 1,169 Total prospects by major 48
Yield Median 33% 49
# of Prospects vs. Yield (accepted to enrolled) High # Prospects/Low Yield High # Prospects/High Yield High 10,681 Bio Maximize Bus ElevateYield Chem Nursing Psych EDU Pol Sci Comm Art High 55% Median # Prospects 1,169 English Crimin Low # Prospects/Low Yield Low # Prospects/High Yield Engin Low 0% Comp Sci Internat History Math Mod For Lang Rel Study Philos Radiol Physics Econ Median Yield 33% Low 162 50