250 likes | 496 Views
Interface roughness scattering in ultra-thin GaN channels in N-polar enhancement-mode GaN MISFETs. Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Jim Speck, and Umesh Mishra ECE and Materials Departments University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 2011 International Symposium on Compound Semiconductors
E N D
Interface roughness scattering in ultra-thin GaN channels in N-polar enhancement-mode GaN MISFETs Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Jim Speck, and Umesh Mishra ECE and Materials Departments University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 2011 International Symposium on Compound Semiconductors Berlin, Germany *uttam@ece.ucsb.edu
Outline • N-polar E-mode GaN HEMTs • Mobility in the scaled channels • Low-T mobility and roughness scattering • Conclusion
E-mode ultra-scaled N-polar GaN devices No electron barrier N-polar inverted HEMT N-polar GaN • No barrier to electron on top of 2-DEG grading to narrowgap InN low resistance contacts (0.027 W-mm)1 • AlGaN back confinement of 2-DEG, control short channel effects2 • E-mode devices 1. S.Dasgupta, APL 2010 2. S. Rajan, IEEE TED 2011
8, 10, 12 nm GaN channel Top AlN depletes 2-DEG under gate Under gate Under S/D contacts* Under sidewall AlN removed under sidewall * S.Dasgupta, APL 2010 E-mode device structure and design Under gate
Short channel effect, channel scaling 8 nm GaN channel 20 nm GaN Vt roll-off with gate length • Vth roll off with gate length • Vertical scaling needed to maintain E-mode at sub-50 nm gate lengths • Vertical scaling for high Rds at sub-50-nm gate lengths
Mobility in thin channel • Need 5 nm thick GaN channel for sub-50 nm devices • Mobility drops with decreasing GaN channel thickness
Mobility in ultra-scaled devices Mobility under the sidewall access regions low source access resistance Mobility under the gate Quasi-ballistic operation
Device test structure Et __ • Design target ~ 8×1012 to 10×1012 cm-2 • Modulation doping layer: GaN or AlGaN grade • Si doping to keep Ef away from the trap level Et • UV-Ozone, BHF treatment for process simulation
Mobility dependence on Si doping Si : 5 e18 cm-3 Si : 2 e 19 cm-3 • High 3D Si doping to keep hole trap away from the Fermi level • Similar 2-D Si density in the samples • High Si density may lead to rougher interface
Mobility dependence on AlN etch SiNx cap 8 nm channel graded back-barrier mobility AlN wet etch treated • Selective AlN wet etching leads to reduction in mobility • GaN etching negligible, surface roughening feasible
Low-temperature mobility graded back-barrier 5e18 cm-3 Si • Low temperature mobility remove phonon contribution • Coulombic scattering dominant
Mobility model with no roughness scattering • Calculated mobility deviates significantly at low temperature • Local Coulombic scattering
Roughness scattering (I) : Local field effect • Roughness induced scattering depends on the local field * Ferry and Goodnick
Roughness scattering (II) : Sub-band energy • Ground state energy calculated from perturbation theory * Sakaki, APL 1987
Mobility model with roughness scattering L ∆ Roughness parameter ∆ = 0.82 nm, L = 1.4 nm
N-face growth surface 5 nm GaN channel 8 nm GaN channel • N-face surface rms roughness ~ 1 nm
Quantum well scattering in SOI Riddet, IEEE TED 2010 • SOI body thickness variation due to roughness leads to drop in mobility
Conclusionsand future work • Study mobility drop in thin channels • Effect of doping and process • Low temperature mobility • Roughness scattering included • Remote surface roughness scattering This work was supported by DARPA NEXT program