1 / 27

Nuclear Power in Korea & Romania-Korea Nuclear Cooperation

Nuclear Power in Korea & Romania-Korea Nuclear Cooperation. September 2006. PART I. STATUS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN KOREA. Electric Power Organizational Structure. President. Prime Minister. Ministry of Science & Technology. Ministry of Commerce, Industry & Energy. Ministry of Planning

yates
Download Presentation

Nuclear Power in Korea & Romania-Korea Nuclear Cooperation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nuclear Power in Korea & Romania-Korea Nuclear Cooperation September 2006

  2. PART I STATUS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN KOREA

  3. Electric Power Organizational Structure President Prime Minister Ministry of Science & Technology Ministry of Commerce, Industry & Energy Ministry of Planning & Budget Nuclear Safety, R&D, Licensing Policy Making, Supervision Budget, Accounting KEPCO The state owned electricity utility Hydro / Nuclear Fossil 5 Generation Companies KHNP Established in Apr. ’01 To be remained as a state owned To be privatized

  4. Installed Capacity Electricity Generation Nuclear Coal Gas Oil Hydro Status of Electric Power (As of the end of 2005) 1.4%(5,153) 6.2% (3,885) 4.8% (17,883) 28.5% (17,716) 40.3% (146,779) 7.4% (4,605) 16.0% (58,250) 26.6% (16,552) 28.9% (17,965) 36.6% (133,657) * Other: 1,537 MW(2.5%) * Other : 3,349 GWh(0.9%) Total : 62,260MW Total : 364,571GWh

  5. (Unit: MW) Site In Operation Under Const. Total Kori 4 (3,137) 2 (2,000) 6 (5,137) Wolsong 4 (2,779) 2 (2,000) 6 (4,779) Yonggwang 6 (5,900) - 6 (5,900) Ulchin 6 (5,900) - 6 (5,900) Total 20 (17,716) 4 (4,000) 24 (21,716) (As of the end of 2005) Seoul • Ulchin #1∼6 • Wolsong #1∼4 • Yonggwang #1∼6 • Shin Wolsong #1,2 • Kori #1∼4 • Shin Kori #1, 2 Status of Nuclear Power Plants

  6. Kori NPP Wolsong NPP Yonggwang NPP Ulchin NPP

  7. Under Construction/Planning Korean companies are taking the leading role in NPP Projects • 8 units 9,600 MW Capacity (MW) Commercial Operation Project Reactor Type Plant Model Remark #1 #2 PWR PWR 1000 1000 OPR1000 OPR1000 Dec. 2010 Dec. 2011 Construction Shin-Kori #3 #4 PWR PWR 1400 1400 APR1400 APR1400 Sep. 2013 Sep. 2014 Planning #1 #2 PWR PWR 1000 1000 OPR1000 OPR1000 Oct. 2011 Oct. 2012 Construction Shin-Wolsong #1 #2 PWR PWR 1400 1400 APR1400 APR1400 Dec. 2015 Dec. 2016 Planning Shin-Ulchin * OPR : Optimized Power Reactor, APR : Advanced Power Reactor

  8. Shin-Kori NPP RCB Unit 2 Unit 1

  9. Shin-Wolsong NPP

  10. 1980s 1990s 2000s 1970s History of Nuclear Power Introduction of Nuclear Power Promotion of Localization Technology Self-reliance Development of Advanced Reactor APR1400 Development (`01) OPR1000 Development (`95) Construction of Kori #1 (`71-`78) Establishment of Localization Plan (`84)

  11. KAERI KOREA ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INST. R & D DOOSAN DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO. EQUIPMENT SUPPLY KOPEC KOREA POWER ENGINEERING CO. A/E + NSSS DESIGN KPS KOREA PLANT SERVICE CO. PLANT MAINTENANCE Hyundai / Daewoo CONSTRUCTION Korean Nuclear Industry KHNP PROJECT MANAGEMENT & OPERATION KNFC KEPCO NUCLEAR FUEL CO. NUCLEAR FUEL SUPPLY

  12. Operational Performance Unplanned shut down / Unit Capacity Factor (%) 3 95.5 100 Capacity Factor (Korea) 80 2 79.3 Capacity Factor (World Average) 60 1 0.5 Unplanned shut down/ Unit 40 0 `05 `92 `93 `94 `95 `96 `97 `98 `99 `00 `01 `02 `03 `04 C.F.(%) 84.5 87.2 87.4 87.3 87.5 87.6 90.3 88.3 90.4 93.2 92.7 94.2 91.4 95.5 shutdown 1.7 1.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5

  13. Outstanding Performance in 2005 • World Generation in 2005 (Nucleonics, ’06.2.9) • KHNP takesall the top five spots on the list of 50 best capacity factors • World Generation Ranking : • No. 1 : Kori #4 (104.85%) • No. 2 : Yonggwang #3 (104.14%) • No. 3 : Ulchin #1, YGN #1 (103.80%) (* two units in third ) • No. 5 : Wolsong #3 (102.29%)

  14. Outline of Wolsong CANDU NPPs Unit Capacity (MWe) Manufacturer Contract Type Construction Period Reactor T/G Excavation COD Months NEI- Parsons AECL 1 679 Turnkey May ’77 Apr ’83 71 AECL / Doosan Doosan / GE Non- Turnkey 2 700 Oct ’91 Jun ’97 68 3 700 〃 〃 〃 Aug ’93 Jun ’98 58 4 700 〃 〃 〃 Aug ’93 Sep ’99 73

  15. PART II ROMANIA-KOREA COOPERATION STATUS

  16. History for Cooperation MOU was signed between MOIR-Romania and KHNP for cooperation in Nuclear Power Projects 2001. 3 Technical Cooperation Agreement was signed between SNN and KHNP 2002. 3 MOU was signed between MOIR-Romania and MOCIE-Korea for cooperation in Cernavoda Nuclear Projects 2003. 7 2004.2 Nuclear Cooperation Agreement signed by both governments Romanian President, H.E. Mr. Traian Basescu, visited Korea and met with President Rho and KHNP President to discuss mutual cooperation in Cernavoda project. 2005. 10 KHNP President visited Romania and met with key persons to enhance mutual cooperation in Cernavoda project, including Presidential Advisor Mr. Stolojan. 2006. 3

  17. Meeting with Romanian President

  18. Meeting with Key-persons

  19. Technical Assistance for Cernavoda #1,2 • Owner consulting services for schedule control for Unit 2 • 2 KHNP experts were dispatched to Cernavoda in May ’02 • Contributed to the reduction of construction schedule • PSA Services for Part 1 (Fuel Handling Systems) for Unit 2 • Contract award to KHNP in November ’05 • To expand technical cooperation areas • Enhancing economic benefits and safety of Unit 1 operation and Unit 2 construction is expected • PSR, design modifications, training, commissioning, etc. Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) for Units 1, 2 was signed between SNN & KHNP inMarch ’02

  20. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 • Joint Study Team • SNN (Leader), KHNP, AECL & Ansaldo • Financial Advisor (Phase 2 only) • Phase 1 Study from March to September 2003 • Technical, economic advantages of the Project proven • Inter-ministerial committee decide to proceed project according to the result of study • Phase 2 Study from October 2003 • To establish appropriate financing model and to draw project plan Phases 1 and 2 Joint Feasibility Study

  21. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 • Project Model Development by Romanian government • ’04. 3 PPP (Public-Private Partnership) Model • ’04. 12 JVPC (Joint Venture Project Company) Model • without State-Aid in accordance with EU Directives • ’06. 8 Another 3 Options being evaluated • Finnish Model • 100% investment from the State • SNN as a major shareholders of project company

  22. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 • FeasibilityReview of Project Models by SNN/D&T • Under PPP Model • Presentations to investors (September ’04, London/Bucharest) • 7 Potential investors selected; KHNP, AECL, Ansaldo, ENEL etc. (November ’04) • Under JVPC Model • 13 Potential investors selected; KHNP, AECL/Ansaldo, and the utilities from Europe and U.S.A (ENEL, RWE, AES, E-on, etc.) (May ’06) • Currently, the feasibility of another 3 options are being reviewed

  23. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 • KHNP’s Contributions to Project Model FeasibilityReview • Presented to SNN Letter of Interests (LOIs) under PPP and JVPC models several times since October ’04 • Provided SNN with appropriate opinions and recommendations in developing the financing models and project conditions • Presented to SNN with clarifications and comments on the conditions for the another 3 options

  24. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 • KHNP’s Plan for Participation in the Project • To decide project plan based on evaluation results of Romania’s final project model and conditions • Option 1 Capital investment as well as a major role of EPC and O&M • Option 2 Participation in EPC and O&M based on its own competitiveness without capital investment

  25. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 (Con’d) • Cooperation with Korea in Unit #3,4 Project • Korea’s involvement in Units 3,4 will certainly contribute to constructing the most successful plants with the highest economy and safety in the world • Korean nuclear Industry has strong intention to take part in Cernavoda Units #3,4 project.

  26. Joint Development of Cernavoda #3,4 (Con’d) • Korea as the most optimal partner for Romania for the Cernavoda Project - Benefiting from its world-top class technologies and experience gained through continuous implementation of 20 NPP projects, including 4 CANDU units, for more than 30 years - Korean Nuclear Industry with systematically established infrastructure is willing to share its technologies with Romania in every field of nuclear power project implementation

  27. Romania Korea

More Related