260 likes | 396 Views
Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center. GoalInfluence stakeholders to implement substantive health care reform before 2011 that will enhance quality and availability of health care for all patientsConvener1,000 thought leaders1,400 patients1,000 surveyed400 on 9-city tour. Patients and Families. Sco
E N D
1. Prospects for Health Care Reform Nora O’Sullivan
Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center
2. Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center Goal
Influence stakeholders to implementsubstantive health care reform before 2011that will enhance quality and availabilityof health care for all patients
Convener
1,000 thought leaders
1,400 patients
1,000 surveyed
400 on 9-city tour
3. Scope of Participation 10 sectors
Providers
Patients/families
Employers
Insurers
Government
Media
Academia
Medical device and pharmaceutical companies
Special interest advocates (i.e. unions and patient advocates)
Medical and health care education
10 sectors
Providers
Patients/families
Employers
Insurers
Government
Media
Academia
Medical device and pharmaceutical companies
Special interest advocates (i.e. unions and patient advocates)
Medical and health care education
4. Patient Engagement InitiativeYour Voice, New Vision Listening Tour Nine city tour to collect letters and film/record “woman/man on the street” views
Focus groups
Survey
Focus Groups:
Six sessions in Atlanta, Cincinnati, and Los Angeles with chronic disease patients
Reviewed MCHPC recommendations without identifying them with Mayo Clinic
Cornerstones endorsed when explained– they were not self evident
When changing delivery system, concerned about major shifts; recommended a phased approach
People fear that change could make things worse
Survey Methodology
1,018 online surveys
U.S. residents, ages 25-75
All health care decision makers
Frustrated with health care
Happy with personal provider
Want tools and information to get more involved in their own care
Distressed with the high cost of health care
Opposed to new taxes and more government involvement
Believe quality, coordination and access can be improved
Are pessimistic about prospects for health care reform within the next 10 years
Focus Groups:
Six sessions in Atlanta, Cincinnati, and Los Angeles with chronic disease patients
Reviewed MCHPC recommendations without identifying them with Mayo Clinic
Cornerstones endorsed when explained– they were not self evident
When changing delivery system, concerned about major shifts; recommended a phased approach
People fear that change could make things worse
Survey Methodology
1,018 online surveys
U.S. residents, ages 25-75
All health care decision makers
Frustrated with health care
Happy with personal provider
Want tools and information to get more involved in their own care
Distressed with the high cost of health care
Opposed to new taxes and more government involvement
Believe quality, coordination and access can be improved
Are pessimistic about prospects for health care reform within the next 10 years
5. MCHPC Cornerstones Created over a three-year period.
Includes two symposia and numerous forums and discussion groups…
Note the alignment with Mayo’s strategic plan
Quality– part of creating value
Integration – coordinating care
Insuring everyone and reforming the payment system require government leadership.Created over a three-year period.
Includes two symposia and numerous forums and discussion groups…
Note the alignment with Mayo’s strategic plan
Quality– part of creating value
Integration – coordinating care
Insuring everyone and reforming the payment system require government leadership.
6. Create Value Improve outcomes and satisfaction with U.S. health care. Decrease medical errors and waste.
Develop a common definition of value:
Outcomes + Safety + Service
Cost of care over time
Publicly display outcomes and aggregate prices
Support health care delivery science
Synthesize medical information
7. Coordinate Care Coordinate patient services across people, functions, locations and time to increase value.
Form coordinated systems
Center care around the needs of patients and families
Identify and pay for a local care coordinator
Use a common, interoperable medical record
Pay for delivering the desired outcome
End-of-life issues: Build public awareness; Use shared decision-making tools to guide discussions
8. Coordinate Care Provide complete, accurate information to patients
Leverage health information technology (HIT)
Provide information access to stakeholders with appropriate privacy safeguards for patients
Build/support interoperable, standards-based HIT networks
Establish a voluntary patient identifier
Construct critical data elements (identity, medications, etc.)
Demonstrate the business case for interoperable HIT
Align incentives for widespread adoption
Make implementation simpler
9. Reform the Payment System Change the way providers are paid in order to improve health and minimize waste.
Pay providers based on value
Create and test payment systems that provide incentives for providers to:
Coordinate care
Improve care
Support informed patient decision-making
10. Provide Health Insurance for All Provide guaranteed, portable health insurance for all citizens.
Require adults to purchase private insurance
No pre-existing condition exclusions
Provide sliding-scale government subsidies
Employers can continue to participate
Allow individuals to purchase more services or insurance
Appoint an independent body (U.S. Health Board) to provide a simple coordinating mechanism for individuals to select a private insurance option
11. The President’s Vision for Health Care Reform Reduce costs for families, businesses and government
Premiums doubled from 2000-2008
Health care is an economic issue
People voted based on health care issues
Ensure affordable, quality health care for all Americans
57M Americans having problems paying for health care
50% of people in foreclosure cite health care as issue
Highest cost of any nation by any measure
Infant mortality 29th; outcomes, errors not good
Provide choice of doctors, plans and hospitals
12. Is Reform Possible in 2009? President and Congressional leadership have made it a top priority
A filibuster-proof majority
Specter, Franken
“Reconciliation” – after Sept. 30
Numerous coalitions still standing (but some are getting shakier)
Everyone wants to stay at the table to ensure they are not on the menu
No one admits that the status quo is a viable option (yet)
The “Public Plan” – a potential deal breaker From WSJ blog
Sen. Arlen Specter said his switch to the Democratic Party doesn’t mean he will automatically vote for legislation to overhaul health care. He’ll take the proposals piece by piece.
Specter also said he would be “very reluctant” to tax employer-based health insurance.
But he said he doesn’t accept a main Democratic proposal: a public health plan that would compete with private insurers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget conference committee negotiators reached an agreement on a $3.5 trillion fiscal year 2010 budget resolution that includes budget reconciliation as a means of passing health reform legislation.
Under the agreement, Congress would have until Oct. 15 to pass deficit-neutral health care reform legislation. If no measure is passed, deficit-neutral health care overhaul legislation could be attached to the budget reconciliation bill.
Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said that he "sincerely" believes Democrats will use reconciliation only as a last resort.
Reconciliation is a legislative process of the United States Senate intended to allow a contentious budget bill to be considered without being subject to filibuster.
From WSJ blog
Sen. Arlen Specter said his switch to the Democratic Party doesn’t mean he will automatically vote for legislation to overhaul health care. He’ll take the proposals piece by piece.
Specter also said he would be “very reluctant” to tax employer-based health insurance.
But he said he doesn’t accept a main Democratic proposal: a public health plan that would compete with private insurers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget conference committee negotiators reached an agreement on a $3.5 trillion fiscal year 2010 budget resolution that includes budget reconciliation as a means of passing health reform legislation.
Under the agreement, Congress would have until Oct. 15 to pass deficit-neutral health care reform legislation. If no measure is passed, deficit-neutral health care overhaul legislation could be attached to the budget reconciliation bill.
Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said that he "sincerely" believes Democrats will use reconciliation only as a last resort.
Reconciliation is a legislative process of the United States Senate intended to allow a contentious budget bill to be considered without being subject to filibuster.
13. Major Issue #1Insurance for All – Public Plan Option
Will it be government run with government price controls?
Will there be an unfair advantage over private plans?
14. Current Public Plan Options The Schumer Plan or the Modest Public Plan
A government plan subject to the same rules as private insurance
Medicare-like Plan
A variant was in the draft of the House Tri-Committee approach
The Co-op Public Plan
State/regional consumer health cooperatives would provide a non-profit, non-government, consumer-driven coverage option
The “Trigger” Plan
A public plan would be “triggered” into existence if the private insurance market didn’t provide enough options or cost control
Senate HELP Committee and Senate Finance Committee (?) The Schumer Plan or the Modest Public Plan: Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) proposed that any public health insurance option developed as part of comprehensive health care reform legislation be subject to the same rules and standards as private insurance. This is the plan that is often referred to as “leveling the playing field.”
Medicare-like Plan
Medicare for the rest of us. The Commonwealth Fund estimate that it would save the average consumer 20 percent to 30 percent. That would give it a massive competitive advantage over private insurers, and would probably result in tens of millions of Americans dropping their current coverage and entering the public plan to save money. A variant of this was in the draft of Ted Kennedy's HELP bill and the House Tri-Committee approach.
House Tri-Committee (House Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce and Education and Labor Committee )
A Medicare-like model would pay Medicare rates for 3 years (or Medicare + 5% for physicians who agree to participate in both Medicare and the new public plan). After 3 years, the new “Health Choices Commissioner” would set the rates.
The Schumer Plan or the Modest Public Plan: Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) proposed that any public health insurance option developed as part of comprehensive health care reform legislation be subject to the same rules and standards as private insurance. This is the plan that is often referred to as “leveling the playing field.”
Medicare-like Plan
Medicare for the rest of us. The Commonwealth Fund estimate that it would save the average consumer 20 percent to 30 percent. That would give it a massive competitive advantage over private insurers, and would probably result in tens of millions of Americans dropping their current coverage and entering the public plan to save money. A variant of this was in the draft of Ted Kennedy's HELP bill and the House Tri-Committee approach.
House Tri-Committee (House Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce and Education and Labor Committee )
A Medicare-like model would pay Medicare rates for 3 years (or Medicare + 5% for physicians who agree to participate in both Medicare and the new public plan). After 3 years, the new “Health Choices Commissioner” would set the rates.
15. Government-run (“Public”) Plan: Concerns Present Value of Unfunded Liability 75-Year Model
Social Security $ 6.6 trillion
Medicare $ 36.3 trillion
Source: 2008 Report of Social Security and Medicare Trustees, March 26, 2008
Present Value of Unfunded Liability 75-Year Model
Social Security $ 6.6 trillion
Medicare $ 36.3 trillion
Source: 2008 Report of Social Security and Medicare Trustees, March 26, 2008
16. Government-run (“Public”) Plan: Concerns
17. Making Private Insurance Work for AllInsurance Market Reforms
Require Americans to purchase health insurance
Provide sliding scale subsidies to those in need
Prohibit pre-existing condition exclusions
Define a minimum health benefit package or actuarial equivalent
Adjust risk-level among enrollees
18. Major Issue #2Pay for Value
Current payment models reward volume instead of value
Dartmouth Atlas data show huge regional variation in costs of treating the same types of patients
Low-value regions are paid more; high-value regions are penalized
19. MCHPC: Pay-for-Value Recommendations Value indexing using current Medicare payment system
Bundling payments for expensive acute care conditions
Demonstration/pilot projects to generate long-term recommendations
20. Pay-for-Value Provisions in Current Bills House Tri-Committee Bill
No value indexing yet (perhaps during mark-up)
Pilot projects that pay for care coordination, including Accountable Care Organizations and Medical Homes
Payment bonuses for physicians in the lowest cost areas of the country
HELP Committee Bill
None
Senate Finance Committee Bill (?)
21. Advocating for Payment Reform Leadership Perspectives
E-newsletter to Congress
Chicago Tribune op/ed
Statement on Tri-Committee bill
Wall Street Journal editorial
“Oh, and the Mayo Clinic – upheld by President Obama and other Democrats as a model for reform – also weighed in on the House bill Thursday, though without the AMA's fanfare. While noting "some positive provisions," it "misses the opportunity to help create higher-quality, more affordable health care for patients. In fact, it will do the opposite."
22. Advocating for Payment Reform Media coverage
Charlie Rose
Washington Post
Time Magazine
The New Yorker
Modern Healthcare
Open letter in Roll Call
Conversations with members of Congress and the Administration
Zeke Emanuel, Peter Orzsag, Nancy Ann DeParle
Senator Max Baucus
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
23. What’s Next? House markups in July
House vote on Tri-Committee bill
New Senate Finance Committee draft
Senate will need to merge two separate bills
Target for floor votes after the August recess
Conference committee in August
Bill to President in the Fall
Still reconciliation option after Sept. 30
BRUCE’S COMMENT: These proposals are a small step in the right direction – They begin to differentiate payment based upon how a provider performs.
In general, these proposals are aimed at saving Medicare money… giving incentives for poor performers to improve… NOT rewarding providers that are currently providing high-value care.
Most of the payment options presented base a portion of payment on a quality score, which overwhelmingly relies on process indicators (i.e. administering aspirin for potential heart attack patients)
Under value-based purchasing, Medicare would provide new payment incentives for care that contributes to positive patient outcomes.
Create short Medicare pilot programs to test patient-centered care coordination models for patients with chronic diseases
Establish a value-based purchasing program for hospitals starting in FY 2012
Strengthen and expand programs that extend value-based purchasing to doctors
Promote primary care
Provide primary care practitioners and targeted general surgeons with a Medicare bonus of at least five percent for five years
Provide payments to primary care providers that offer specific transitional care services for patients with chronic conditions.
Care coordination/collaboration/accountability
Medicare payment incentives to hospitals that reduce preventable hospital readmissions
Single bundled Medicare hospital payment for acute and post-acute episodes of care
Allow high-quality, collaborative providers to share up to 50 percent of the savings they achieve for Medicare
BRUCE’S COMMENT: These proposals are a small step in the right direction – They begin to differentiate payment based upon how a provider performs.
In general, these proposals are aimed at saving Medicare money… giving incentives for poor performers to improve… NOT rewarding providers that are currently providing high-value care.
Most of the payment options presented base a portion of payment on a quality score, which overwhelmingly relies on process indicators (i.e. administering aspirin for potential heart attack patients)
Under value-based purchasing, Medicare would provide new payment incentives for care that contributes to positive patient outcomes.
Create short Medicare pilot programs to test patient-centered care coordination models for patients with chronic diseases
Establish a value-based purchasing program for hospitals starting in FY 2012
Strengthen and expand programs that extend value-based purchasing to doctors
Promote primary care
Provide primary care practitioners and targeted general surgeons with a Medicare bonus of at least five percent for five years
Provide payments to primary care providers that offer specific transitional care services for patients with chronic conditions.
Care coordination/collaboration/accountability
Medicare payment incentives to hospitals that reduce preventable hospital readmissions
Single bundled Medicare hospital payment for acute and post-acute episodes of care
Allow high-quality, collaborative providers to share up to 50 percent of the savings they achieve for Medicare
24. How You Can Help Influence leaders during August Recess
Health Care Repair (www.healthcarerepair.org)
Contact elected officials
Host/attend events
Blog/write letters to the editor
25. Why do we needto make these changes?