1 / 25

Semi-implicit predictor-corrector methods for atmospheric models

Semi-implicit predictor-corrector methods for atmospheric models. Colm Clancy Janusz A. Pudykiewicz Atmospheric Numerical Weather Prediction Research, Environment Canada PDEs on the Sphere, 26 th of September 2012. Motivation.

yen-cantrell
Download Presentation

Semi-implicit predictor-corrector methods for atmospheric models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semi-implicit predictor-corrector methods for atmospheric models Colm Clancy Janusz A. Pudykiewicz Atmospheric Numerical Weather Prediction Research, Environment Canada PDEs on the Sphere, 26th of September 2012

  2. Motivation • Development of a finite-volume atmospheric model on an icosahedral grid (Pudykiewicz 2006, 2011) • Investigation of stable time integration schemes, beyond the traditional semi-implicit leapfrog • Some recent work: Williams (2011), Durran & Blossey (2012), Kar (2012)

  3. General ODE system

  4. General ODE system ‘Traditional’ semi-implicit, (SILF):

  5. Semi-implicit predictor-corrector approach Predictor stage, for : Corrector stage, for :

  6. Implicit linear terms: Trapezoidal AM2*

  7. Explicit nonlinear terms:

  8. Many possible combinations… Examples:

  9. Linear stability analysis

  10. Reference semi-implicit

  11. Shallow water tests • Shallow water model of Pudykiewicz (2011) • Iterative GCR(4) solver for Helmholtz equations (Smolarkiewicz and Margolin, 2000) • No explicit diffusion • Filter of Williams (2011) for the semi-implicit leapfrog • Spatial resolution: grid 6 (40,962 nodes, ~112km).Reference: grid 7 (163,842 nodes, ~56km) with RK4 at 90s time-step

  12. Sample results:Flow over isolated mountain

  13. Williamson et al. (1992) – Mountain case

  14. Williamson et al. (1992) – Mountain case

  15. Williamson et al. (1992) – Mountain case

  16. Sample results:Rossby-Haurwitz wave

  17. Williamson et al. (1992) – RH wave case

  18. Williamson et al. (1992) – RH wave case

  19. Williamson et al. (1992) – RH wave case

  20. Efficiency • Predictor-corrector schemes: two elliptic solver calls per time-step • Consider total number of iterations per step

  21. Efficiency

  22. Conclusions and further work • Semi-implicit predictor-corrector schemes offer an accurate alternative to the traditional leapfrog: • Stable • No time filter necessary • Efficiency not affected • Future tests with a three-dimensional baroclinic model • Comparison with other time integration methods

  23. References • Clancy & Pudykiewicz (2012); to appear in J. Comp. Phys. • Durran & Blossey (2012); Mon. Weather. Rev. 140, 1307-1325 • Kar (2012); Mon. Weather. Rev. 134, 2916-2926 • Pudykiewicz (2006); J. Comp. Phys. 213, 358-390 • Pudykiewicz (2011); J. Comp. Phys. 230, 1956-1991 • Smolarkiewicz & Margolin (2000). Proc. ECWMF Workshop, 5-7 June 2000, 137-159 • Williams (2011); Mon. Weather. Rev. 139, 1996-2007 • Williamson et al. (1992); J. Comp. Phys. 102, 211-224

  24. Many possible combinations…

More Related