330 likes | 411 Views
Brain compatible teaching & learning How can we encourage Japanese students to speak in English language class?. Kaori Nonoguchi. Japanese students tend to. Not speak in class Have a lower listening skill (Shimizu)
E N D
Brain compatible teaching & learningHow can we encourage Japanese students to speak in English language class? Kaori Nonoguchi
Japanese students tend to • Not speak in class • Have a lower listening skill (Shimizu) • “Be better writers than fluent speakers because they trust the eyes more than the mouth or ears” (Shimizu) • Like group works (Leestma & Walberg) • Control their emotions very well (Nonoguchi) • Like humor (Nonoguchi) • Display a lack of creativity (Leestma & Walberg)
Contents • Characteristics of “brain-compatible” teaching and learning. • General guidelines for my own teaching • How to stimulate brain-compatible learning through questioning and graphic aids emphasizing essential questions and inquiry process incorporating Web Quests and the Internet
Characteristics • Facilitate pleasure • Facilitate learning • Facilitate improved health Facilitate pleasure Facilitate learning Facilitate improved health
PLEASURE • Emotions are the gate keeper to learning Memory • Emotional intelligence by Daniel Goleman Self awareness, managing emotions, motivation, empathy, and social art • Enriched environment Safe and secure environment challenging experiences Lighting and temperature “Creating a respectful, caring and intentionally inviting learning environment is the surest way to encourage student achievement.” (Puckey & Aspy)
LEARNING • Multiple Intelligences • Learning styles • Whole brain teaching • Knowledge about how we learn • Thinking curriculum
Multiple Intelligence by Howard GardnerIn everyday life, people can display intelligent originality in any of eight intelligences • Communication intelligences 1. Verbal/Linguistic 2. Musical/rhythmic • Intelligences relate to objects in our world 3. Visual/spatial 4. Bodily/kinesthetic 5. Logical/mathematical 6. Naturalist • Intelligences relateto the self 7. Interpersonal 8. Intrapersonal
Learning styles Visual learners Auditory learners Kinesthetic learners
Whole brain teaching • Each person has a thinking preference • Ways of thinking often change as a result of significant emotional experiences, life transitions and other important insights.
Knowledge about how we learn 1In the world of the future, the new illiterate will be the person who has not learned how to learn - Alvin Toffler
Thinking curriculum • In-depth Learning • Learning tasks stimulate complex thinking • Students are engaged in whole tasks • Connects content and process to learners’ background
Successful intelligence by Robert Sternberg The ability to solve problems and make choices and judge critically. Analytical Intelligence Creative Intelligence Practical Intelligence The ability to read and adapt to the contexts of everyday life The ability to think “outside the box”
Traditional Vs. Thinking curriculum • Students acquire content as they plan, evaluate, solve problems, make decisions, critique arguments and compose essays • Student masters knowledge • Students use knowledge after graduation
IMPROVED HEALTH • Movement (physical activities)- Oxygenate the brain function • Water – maximized brain • Music – Inspiring, motivating, or calming • Challenge • Choice • Humor • Feedback • Novelty • Color
Every brain is unique “When music is playing, students may be more apt to speak in their small groups” (Allen,2002) Develop and nurture the intelligence of every learner Get along with students Sensitivity to students’ emotional intelligence Use music Use many visual aids “Students trust their eyes more than the mouth or ears” (Shimizu) Develop students’ thinking skills
How to stimulate brain-compatible learning through questioning and graphic aids
Why questioning? • Diagnose students’ level of understanding • Involve students • Test students’ knowledge • Review key points • Stimulate creativity • Modify students’ perception of the subject • Develop higher order thinking skills
Questioning Technique • Scaffolding • Graphic organizers • Wait time – “The brain can access information stored in the unconscious long-term memory.” (Gregory, 2005) Quality thinking Next
Scaffolding for Japanese students • Provide visual aids • Write key words on the white board • Provide a hint or a cue for answering • Body language Back
Graphic organizers • Graphic organizer (included in nonlinguistic representations) increase students achievement with the possibility of 37 percentile gains. (Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock, 2001) • Help students thinking visible (support or develop visual learners). • Integrating visual and verbal activities enhances understanding of concepts. (Sousa, 2006)
How to stimulate brain-compatible learning emphasizing essential questions & inquiry process
Essential questions • Heart of the curriculum Essence of what students should examine and know • Help students structure a unit or lesson • Provocative and arguable • May not have a right answer • Initiators of creative and critical thinking Bloom’s Taxonomy Encourage a good doubt Curiosity, Wonder and Wander • Spark meaningful connection with prior knowledge • Allow transferring to other subjects
How to stimulate brain-compatible learning incorporating Web Quests and the Internet
Web quests • Short term designed to be completed in one to three class periods knowledge acquisition and integration deal with a great amount of new information and make sense of it • Longer term designed to take between one week and one month extending and refining knowledge analyze a body of knowledge, transform it, and demonstrate understanding
Web Quests & Internet • Motivate students • Require authentic materials • Develop thinking skills • Broaden students’ imagination • Scaffolding • Cooperative learning • Use time well • Use information rather than looking for
Web quest & internet meet Japanese students’ needs Cooperative Learning
References • http://knono.tripod.com/~ozpk/higher • http://www.utoronto.ca/tatp/questioning_edited.pdf • http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc4think.htm • Gregory, G. (2005) Differentiating instruction with style. • Leestma, R. & Walberg, H. (1992) Japanese educational productivity. • Nonoguchi, K. (2008). “A survey of Japanese students who study English language at Kumamoto University.” • Shimizu, J. (n.d) Why are Japanese students reluctant to express their opinions in the classroom? • Sousa, D. (2006) How the brain learns. • Sprenger, M. (2008) Differentiation through learning styles and memory.