1 / 9

Services Providers Conjoint

Hotel A $$$ *** Friendly Customized Value___. Hotel B $$$ *** Friendly Standardized Value ___. Hotel C $$$ *** Not Friendly Customized Value ___. Hotel D $$$ *** Not Friendly Standardized Value ___. Hotel E $$$ ** Friendly Customized Value ___. Hotel F $$$ **

yepa
Download Presentation

Services Providers Conjoint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hotel A $$$ *** Friendly Customized Value___ Hotel B $$$ *** Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel C $$$ *** Not Friendly Customized Value ___ Hotel D $$$ *** Not Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel E $$$ ** Friendly Customized Value ___ Hotel F $$$ ** Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel G $$$ ** NotFriendly Customized Value ___ Hotel H $$$ ** NotFriendly Standardized Value ___ Services Providers Conjoint

  2. Hotel L $$ *** Not Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel I $$ *** Friendly Customized Value ___ Hotel J $$ *** Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel K $$ *** Not Friendly Customized Value ___ Hotel M $$ ** Friendly Customized Value ___ Hotel N $$ ** Friendly Standardized Value ___ Hotel O $$ ** NotFriendly Customized Value ___ Hotel P $$ ** NotFriendly Standardized Value ___ Services Providers Conjoint

  3. Data for 1 Consumer Scenario Cost Quality Friendly Customized Rating* A 1 1 1 1 2 B 1 1 1 0 4 C 1 1 0 1 6 D 1 1 0 0 8 E 1 0 1 1 9 F 1 0 1 0 13 G 1 0 0 1 11 H 1 0 0 0 16 I 0 1 1 1 1 J 0 1 1 0 3 K 0 1 0 1 5 L 0 1 0 0 7 M 0 0 1 1 10 N 0 0 1 0 14 O 0 0 0 1 12 P 0 0 0 0 15 *1=most preferred

  4. This Conjoint in SAS—Input data reg; input stim $ cost quality friend custom judg; costqual=cost*quality; costfrie=cost*friend; *etc.; cqfc=cost*quality*friend*custom; cards; A 1 1 1 1 2 B 1 1 1 0 4 C 1 1 0 1 6 D 1 1 0 0 8 E 1 0 1 1 9 F 1 0 1 0 13 G 1 0 0 1 11 H 1 0 0 0 16 I 0 1 1 1 1 J 0 1 1 0 3 K 0 1 0 1 5 L 0 1 0 0 7 M 0 0 1 1 10 N 0 0 1 0 14 O 0 0 0 1 12 P 0 0 0 0 15 proc reg; model judg = cost quality friend custom / stb; proc reg; model judg = cost quality friend custom costqual costfrie / stb;run;

  5. This Conjoint in SAS—Output Model: MODEL1 Dep Variable: JUDG Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Prob>F Model 4 328.25000 82.06250 76.824 0.0001 Error 11 11.75000 1.06818 C Total 15 340.00000 Root MSE 1.03353 R-Square 0.9654 Dep Mean 8.50000 Adj R-Sq 0.9529 C.V. 12.15916 Parameter Estimates Parameter Standard T for H0: Variable DF Estimate Error Parameter=0 Prob>|T| INTERCEP 1 15.375000 0.57776017 26.611 0.0001 COST 1 0.250000 0.51676441 0.484 0.6380 QUALITY 1 -8.000000 0.51676441 -15.481 0.0001 FRIEND 1 -3.000000 0.51676441 -5.805 0.0001 CUSTOM 1 -3.000000 0.51676441 -5.805 0.0001 Variable DF Standardized Estimate INTERCEP 1 0.00000000 COST 1 0.02711631 QUALITY 1 -0.86772183 FRIEND 1 -0.32539569 CUSTOM 1 -0.32539569

  6. Regression for 1 Consumer Regression Results for n Consumers: Utilities Consumer b1(cost) b2(qual) b3(friend) b4(custom) 1 -.027 .868 .325 .325 2 3 ... n

  7. Sectors Studied Experience: Hotels, Fast Food Outlets, Hair Salon, Checking Account Credence: Tax Consultant, Psychotherapist, Physician, Financial Investments

  8. Criticality of Service Need Low: e.g., Imagine that you need to make an appointment to have your hair trimmed in the next couple of days. High: Imagine that you need to make an appointment to have your hair cut and styled for a very important social occasion scheduled for tomorrow.

  9. Price Price Low Criticality Price High Criticality Experience Credence Low High Criticality Experience Credence Selection of Results

More Related