150 likes | 290 Views
Economic systems. Ways that societies answer WHAT to produce, HOW to produce, and FOR WHOM to produce. Three key systems. Traditional economy Command economy Market economy
E N D
Economic systems Ways that societies answer WHAT to produce, HOW to produce, and FOR WHOM to produce.
Three key systems • Traditional economy • Command economy • Market economy • Each system provides the guidelines for answering the three basic economic questions considering availability of resources.
Traditional economy • Why is June a popular month for weddings? • Why are men wearing hats indoors considered to be impolite? • In a traditional economy, habit and custom dictate answers for production within a community. • The Inuit of Alaska and Northern Canada, or Amish communities in various areas still provide examples of traditional economies today.
Traditional economy • What is produced? • Continue to hunt, farm, and produce same products/services that have been produced for generations. Inuit hunt, Amish farm and produce furniture and other goods. • How is it produced? • Amish reject modern technologies. Children fall into same occupations as parents. • For whom is it produced? • Largely produced for community, but some goods produced for trade or sale with others to meet needs that may not be met on own.
Traditional economy • Advantages: • Everyone knows role • Little uncertainty of WHAT to produce • Little uncertainty of HOW to produce- no new technologies to learn (next year’s system) • Disadvantages: • New ideas discouraged • Strict roles effectively punish those who act differently or break rules • Lack of progress leads to lower standard of living
Command economy • Exists when a central authority makes most of the decisions of WHAT, HOW, and FOR WHOM to produce. (Stalin’s 5-year plans; Mao’s land reform policies) • The two most prominent examples of a command economy today is North Korea and Cuba. • Russian and China maintained command economies for most of the 20th century, but both have transitioned toward market economies.
Command economy • Advantages: • Direction of the economy can change drastically in a short amount of time. • Many health and public services are available to the populace for little or no cost. • Disadvantages: • Not designed to meet the wants and needs of consumers. • Does not give incentive to work (Academic tests) • Requires large decision making bureaucracy • Does not have the flexibility to handle minor day-to-day problems. • People with unique skills or ideas are often unused.
Market economy • Consumers essentially decide WHAT and FOR WHOM questions because their decisions act as votes. • Entreprenuers then will largely decide HOW items will be produced in as efficient manner as possible in order to increase profit margins. • Examples include the United States, Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Germany, France and Great Britain
Market economy • Advantages: • Can adjust to change over time (cars produced during gas crisis; vhs/dvd) • High degree of individual freedom (product/service; occupation) • Relatively small degree of government interference (laissez-faire) • Decision making is de-centralized, not in the hands of the few • Variety of goods and services available • High degree of consumer satisfaction (what if customers complaints are not remedied?)
Market economy • Disadvantages: • Does not provide the basic needs for entire population (unemployment numbers) • Does not provide enough of highly valued services (health, education), focused on items to be sold • High degree of uncertainty for workers and business in times of change • Markets can fail if three conditions not met: 1) reasonable competition; 2) resources must remain free to be moved from one activity to another; 3) consumers need access to adequate information for choices (when markets fail, businesses become too large, and some individuals receive incomes not reflective of productivity
Common uses Command Economy = Communism Mixed Economy = Socialism Market Economy = Capitalism