170 likes | 201 Views
This chapter explores the role of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in persuasion and compliance-gaining. It discusses the causes and effects of aggression, the different levels of argumentativeness, and the factors that influence persuasive communication. Additionally, it examines the impact of aggressive communication in personal relationships and organizational settings.
E N D
Chapter 7 Argumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness, and Persuasion
Compliance-gaining involving argumentative behavior • When attempting to persuade others, we: • Argue to support advocated position • Argue to refute others’ positions • The manner by which comm occurs affects
Verbally aggressive comm • If force is applied symbolically to dominate, damage, defeat, or destroy the “locus of attack” • Bad versus good aggression
4 aspects of Aggression • Assertiveness • Direct, defend rights/interests • Argumentativeness • Tend to approach/avoid argument • Hostility • Irritability, negativity, resentment, suspicion • Verbal aggressiveness • Transference, disdain, social learning, skill deficiency
Causes • Psychopathology • Disdain • Social learning/Parental reinforcement • Self-esteem • Inherited trait/Genetics • Excessive activation • Inadequate skills
High Aggressives • Desensitized to hurt they cause • Do not view VA messages same as others • Reasons: • Disdain for target • Desire to be mean • Eagerness to appear tough • Involvement in disc that turn into verbal fights
Situational Factors rather than trait position • Can be joint product • Motivation to argue is determined by trait argumentativeness and perception of likeliness to succeed and how important that is to the person
TRA versus interactionist • Neither better at predicting argumentative intentions • Actually TRA worse at predicting motiv to argue
Beliefs about arguing • Hostility • Activity/process • interaction • Control/dominance • Self-image • Learning • Skill
H/M/L argumentatives • Different pcpns of 2 functions of arguing • Cultivation • Antagonism
Transactional Approach • Ind’s personality affects own & others behavior • Mutual influence emphasized • Both levels of argumentativeness may affect # of arguments and extent of one yielding to the other’s position
Processing Persuasion • Hample & Dalliner – 4 categories of cognitive editing (why we reject arguments) • Effectiveness • Principled objections • Person-centered issues • Discourse competence
Need for cognition (Mongeau, 1989) • Enjoyment derived from engaging in effortful info processing
Kinney and Segrin (1998) • Ability to process info • Sensitivity to feedback • Beliefs about selves
Aggressive Comm & Resistance • H argumentatives more likely to develop counterarguments • Willing and may enjoy it
Displaying Aggression in Pers • 2 communicator styles • Affirming • Nonaffirming
Persuasion in Organizations • Supervisors should be: • Highly argumentative • Low VA with affirming comm style • Encourage expression over controversial views • Leads to higher credibility and as more constructive persuasion styles