1 / 77

Chapter 10: Middle Childhood: Social and Personality Development

Chapter 10: Middle Childhood: Social and Personality Development. Development Across the Lifespan. Social & Personality Development: Understanding Oneself in Middle Childhood.

yoland
Download Presentation

Chapter 10: Middle Childhood: Social and Personality Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 10: Middle Childhood: Social and Personality Development Development Across the Lifespan

  2. Social & Personality Development: Understanding Oneself in Middle Childhood • Children in middle childhood are struggling to understand who they are, and continue to explore answers to the question “Who am I?”

  3. The Developing Self ~ During middle childhood, children begin to view themselves less in terms of external physical attributes and more in terms of psychological traits. • Children realize they are good at some things and not so good at others. • Their self-concepts become divided into personal and academic spheres…

  4. As children get older, their views of self become more differentiated.

  5. (The Developing Self, continued) • Children use SOCIAL COMPARISON, comparing themselves to the abilities, expertise, and opinions of others. • Festinger proposed that when objective measures are absent, people rely on social reality to evaluate themselves (understanding that comes from studying how others act, think, feel, and view the world). • Children look to others who are similar to themselves.

  6. (Social comparison, continued) • Sometimes children make downward social comparisons with others who are obviously less competent or successful to raise or protect their self-esteem. • This explains why some students in elementary school have very high self esteem in spite of the fact that are in special education classes • Big fish in a small pond

  7. Psychosocial Development: Industry versus Inferiority According to Erik Erikson, middle childhood encompasses the INDUSTRY-VERSUS-INFERIORITY STAGE, the period from ages 6 to 12 characterized by a focus on efforts to attain competence in meeting the challenges presented by parents, peers, school, and the other complexities of the modern world.

  8. (Psychosocial Development: Industry versus Inferiority, continued) • Success in this stage is evidenced by feelings of mastery, proficiency, and confidence. • Difficulties lead to feelings of failure and inadequacy, and to withdrawal from academics and socialization with peers • Attaining a sense of industry during middle childhood has lasting consequences! • High levels of childhood industry associated with adult success (more so than intelligence and family background!)

  9. Self esteem: Evaluating the self • Children evaluate themselves in terms of physical and psychological characteristics, but they also think of themselves as being good or bad (involves emotions) • SELF-ESTEEM, an individual's overall and specific positive and negative self-evaluation, develops in important ways during middle childhood.

  10. Self esteem develops in important ways during middle childhood… • Children increasingly compare themselves to others. • Children are developing their own internal standards. • Self-esteem, for most children, increases during middle childhood. • Children with low self-esteem may become enmeshed in a cycle of failure that is difficult to break.

  11. A cycle of Low Self-Esteem If a child has low self-esteem and expects to do poorly on a test, she may experience anxiety and not do as well, which confirms the negative self view. Parents can break this cycle a warm and supportive style.

  12. Self esteem, continued… • Early research showed that the self-esteem of minority groups was lower than majority groups' due to prejudice and discrimination. • Tajfel (French psychologist) showed that if minority groups do not accept the views of their group by the majority group, their self-esteem will not suffer. • Societal attitudes favoring group pride, ethnic awareness, and sensitivity have resulted in more similar levels of self esteem in members of different ethnic groups

  13. Self efficacy: Building expectations of the self • “Will I do well in the spelling bee?” • “I wonder if I would be good at playing the flute?” • “Do I have a chance at winning the award for best science project?” ~ These type of questions resemble those that children commonly ask themselves during the elementary school years. The way children answer is based on their levels of self efficacy.

  14. (Self efficacy, continued) • SELF-EFFICACY refers to the learned expectations that one is capable of carrying out a behavior or producing a desired outcome in a particular situation. • Self-efficacy is crucial to children's success because it motivates greater effort and persistence in the face of a challenging task. • High self-efficacy is related to success in academics and athletics. • Observing others' success, failure, praise, and encouragementare other sources of self-efficacy.

  15. Social & Personality Development: Morals in Middle Childhood • Different theories of moral development exist • Moral development is often used as a measure of social & personality development in middle childhood, albeit in different ways…

  16. An Overview

  17. Morals in Middle Childhood • Moral Dilemmas • Cancer drug question in text • Should you steal the drug? Developmental psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg asserts that the way that children answer this question reveals central aspects about their morality and sense of justice. • Information about stage or moral development • Information about cognitive developmental level

  18. Lawrence Kohlberg Born: 1927, Bronxville, NY Died: 1987, Boston, MA Education: PhD, U. of Chicago Accomplishments: Major contributor to the field of moral development and reasoning; Published major work in 1981, Essays on Moral Development.

  19. Kohlberg’s stages of moral reasoning  Lawrence Kohlberg suggests that people pass through a series of stages in the development of moral reasoning. (summary in text table) • Preconventional Morality (stages 1 & 2) is where people follow unvarying rules based on rewards and punishments (children in MIDDLE CHILDHOOD are at this level!)

  20. (Kohlberg’s stages of moral reasoning, continued) • Conventional Morality (stages 3 & 4) is where people approach problems in terms of their own position as good, responsible members of society. • Postconventional Morality (stages 5 & 6) is where universal moral principles are invoked and considered broader than a particular society.

  21. Some key points related to Kohlberg’s theory • Kohlberg assessed people's moral reasoning using moral dilemmas. • According to Kohlberg, people move through these stages in a fixed order. • Middle childhood is at stage 1 & 2, the preconventional stage, because of the limits of children's cognitive abilities.

  22. (key points related to Kohlberg’s theory, continued) • Kohlberg's theory is a good account of moral judgment but not adequate at predicting moral behavior. • Another problem: the theory is based on data from males, and is inadequate in describing the moral development of females!

  23. Moral Development in Girls Carol Gilligan’s theory of moral development • Carol Gilligan suggests that the way boys and girls are raised in our own society leads to differences in moral reasoning. • Kohlberg's theory is inadequate and places girls' moral reasoning at a lower level than boys'. • Boys view morality primarily in terms of justice and fairness. • Girls see morality in terms of responsibility and compassion toward individuals and a willingness to sacrifice for relationships.

  24. Born: 1937- New York Current: Professor of GenderStudies, Harvard University Education Ph.D., Harvard University Achieve ments: Challenged Lawrence Kohlberg's theories of moral development on the basis of gender bias; Pioneer in the research on moral development of women; One of Time Magazine's 25 most influential people of 1996. Carol Gilligan

  25.  Gilligan sees morality in girls developing in 3 stages. • Orientation toward individual survival - where females concentrate on what is practical and best for them. • Goodness as self-sacrifice - where females think they must sacrifice their own wishes to what others want. • Morality of nonviolence - women come to see hurting anyone as immoral, including themselves. ~The highest levels of morality are represented by compassionate concern for the welfare of others

  26. Relationships in Middle Childhood: Building Friendships • Children’s development is seriously effected by the formation of friendships in middle childhood ~~ Friendships influence children's development in several ways.

  27. The influence of friendships on children’s development, continued • Friends provide information about the world and other people. • Friends provide emotional support and help kids to handle stress. • Friends teach children how to manage and control their emotions.

  28. The influence of friendships on children’s development, continued • Friends teach about communication with others. • Friends foster intellectual growth. • Friends allow children to practice relationship skills

  29. Status among school age children • Children's friendships show clear hierarchies in terms of STATUS, the evaluation of a role or person by other relevant members of a group. • High status children have greater access to resources such as games, toys, books, and information. • High status children tend to form friendships with high status children and low status children form friendships with other lower status children

  30. Status among school age children, continued • Lower status children tend to follow the lead of higher status children. • Popularity is a reflection of a child's status. • High status children are more likely to form exclusive and desirable cliques and tend to play with a greater number of children than lower status children. • Lower status children are more likely to play with younger or less popular children.

  31. During the middle childhood period, children’s ideas about friendship undergo changes…  According to developmental psychologist William Damon, children's friendships go through three stages. • Stage 1 - ages 4-7. • Children see friends as like themselves. • Children see friends as people to share toys and activities with. • Children do not take into account personal traits.

  32. Damon’s 3 stages of friendship, continued • Stage 2 - ages 8-10. • Children now begin to take other's personal qualities and traits into consideration. • Friends are viewed in terms of the kinds of rewards they provide. • Friendships are based on mutual trust.

  33. Damon’s 3 stages of friendship, continued • Stage 3 - ages 11-15. • Friendships become based on intimacy and loyalty. • Friendships involve mutual disclosure and exclusivity. Children also develop clear ideas about the behaviors they seek in friends…

  34. Most-liked Sense of humor Nice/friendly Helpful Complementary Sharing Loyalty Least-liked Verbal aggression Dishonesty Critical Greedy/bossy Teasing Physical aggression Behaviors favored in friends during middle childhood Table in text

  35. What makes a child popular during middle childhood? Popular children have SOCIAL COMPETENCE,the collection of individual social skills that permit individuals to perform successfully in social settings.

  36. More characteristics common to popular children • They are helpful and cooperative. • They have a good sense of humor. • They have good emotional understanding. • They ask for help when necessary. • They are not overly reliant on others. • They can adapt to social situations.

  37. Popularity issues in development, continued  Lack of popularity may take two forms. • NEGLECTED CHILDRENreceive relatively little attention from their peers in the form of either positive or negative interaction. • REJECTED CHILDRENare actively disliked and their peers may react to them in an obviously negative manner.

  38. Some characteristics of unpopular children… • Unpopular children lack social competence. • They may act immature or inappropriately silly. • They may be overly aggressive and overbearing. • They may be withdrawn or shy. • They may be unattractive, handicapped, obese, or slow academically.

  39. Popularity issues in development, continued • Another factor that relates to children's popularity is skill at SOCIAL PROBLEM SOLVING, the use of strategies for solving social conflicts in ways that are satisfactory both to oneself and to others. • Developmental psychologist Kenneth Dodge argues that successful social problem solving proceeds through steps that correspond to children's information-processing strategies:

  40. Dodge’s social problem solving steps • Find and identify relevant social cues. • Interpret and evaluate the social cues. • Determine possible problem-solving responses. • Evaluate responses and their possible consequences. • Choose a response. • Knowing these steps allows adults to intervene and target a child's specific deficits.

  41. Problem-solving Steps Children’s problem-solving steps proceed through several steps involving different information processing strategies (Dodge, 1985)

  42. Several programs have been developed to teach children social skills. • Skills in holding a conversation • Decoding facial expressions to increase sensitivity to others’ emotions and moods  These programs have led to more acceptance by peers and improved skill at making friends and getting along with teachers

  43. Gender & Friendships in Middle Childhood • Avoidance of the opposite sex becomes very pronounced during middle childhood. • Children's friendships are almost entirely sex-segregated.

  44. (Gender & Friendships in Middle Childhood, continued) • When the sexes interact it is called "border work", • often romantic • helps emphasize the clear boundaries between the sexes • Lays the groundwork for future interactions during adolescence • Girls threatening to kiss boys • Boys luring girls into chasing them

  45. The nature of boys' and girls' friendships are different. • Boys have larger networks of friends than girls do. • Boys have a strict DOMINANCE HIERARCHY,which is composed of rankings that represent the relative social power of those in a group hierarchy.

  46. (The differing nature of boys' and girls' friendships, continued) • Boys attempt to maintain and improve their status in the hierarchy, which makes for a style of play known as restrictive play where interactions are interrupted when status is challenged. • Girls focus on one or two "best friends" of relatively equal status.

  47. (The differing nature of boys' and girls' friendships, continued) • Conflicts among girls are solved by compromise, ignoring the situation, or giving in. • Girls, however, can be confrontational with other girls not their friends or with boys. • Girls' language is less confrontational and direct than boys'.

  48. Promoting Cross-race friendships • Children's closest friends tend largely to be with others of the same race. • Research supports the notion that contact between majority and minority group members can reduce prejudice and discrimination. • Contact must occur in equal status settings. • Contact is enhanced through cooperative activities that are important. • The contact must promote equality and disconfirm negative stereotypes.

  49. The Family and School: Shaping Children in Middle Childhood • The structure of the family has been changing dramatically over the past several decades with serious implication for the development of children! • Increase in the # of parents working outside the home • Rise in single parent families • Societal environment • Escalating divorce rate

More Related