270 likes | 420 Views
Title. 1 kHz Glitches in S4. Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut). GEO‘s sensitivity for last 20 days of S4. Peak sensitivity ‚drifted‘ during S4 (much more than at other frequencies). BLRMS of H(t) vs glitch rate. Glitchrate 700-2000 Hz.
E N D
Title 1 kHz Glitches in S4 Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik(Albert-Einstein-Institut)
GEO‘s sensitivity for last 20 days of S4 Peak sensitivity ‚drifted‘ during S4 (much more than at other frequencies)
BLRMS of H(t) vs glitch rate Glitchrate 700-2000 Hz H(t) BLRMS 990-1000 Hz Found relation between glitchrate and peak sensitivity.
Spectra for good and bad time Glitches cause additional noise between 400 Hz and 1.3 kHz • Example times: • high glitch rate • 2005-03-22 06:10:00 • low glitch rate • 2005-03-22 13:00:00
Spectrograms of differential EP-P High glitchrate Low glitchrate Glitches present in MI_diff_EP not an artifact from calibration process
Timeseries of 1kHz Glitches Filtered with bandpass, 950 to 1050 Hz, 6th Order
Noise projections 1 kHz glitches can‘t be explained by our current set of noiseprojections
Bandwidth of burst Probably maximal bandwidth is limited to 400 Hz (strong lines 822 and 1266 Hz)
Periodicity of the glitches Periodicity of 1.45 mHz Sometimes one can see a periodicity (5-10 times per hour) of the glitchrate
1.45 mHz in autoalignment signals 1.45 mHz 2*1.45 mHz
1.45 mHz in MC_AA rotation 2*1.45 mHz 1.45 mHz
Temperatures in the central building 1.45 mHz 2*1.45 mHz 2.3 mHz
2.3 mHz from air conditioning system AC system usually dominates vertical seismic rms at the central building 2.3 mHz is produced by the outdoor unit of central building‘s airconditioning system
Temperatures in the central building 1.45 mHz 2*1.45 mHz 2.3 mHz from AC 1.45 and 2.9 mHz appear strongly in temperature of the laser bench
Periodicity of the glitches Periodicity of 2.5 mHz Sometimes one can see a periodicity (5-10 times per hour) of the glitchrate
2.5 mHz in MPR alignment 2*2.5 mHz 2.5 mHz 3*2.5 mHz 1.45 mHz 2.9 mHz
2.5 mHz in MC2-AA 2*2.5 mHz 2.5 mHz 3*2.5 mHz
2.5 mHz in central building‘s temperatures 2.5 mHz 2.3 mHz
How to go on ?? Analysis of GEO S4 data • Is there any possibility to get vetoes for the 1 kHz Glitches ? • Do we have to make vetoes for the 1 kHz Glitches ? Instrumental viewpoint Some further effort is needed to investigate the Glitches and find their origin. Future issues • How can we avoid such a problem in future? • More time in front of a data run (???)
How to attack the problem „Thinking“: Which hardware of GEO600 could cause glitches with these properties ? Coupling ? What experiments do we need to check a potential hypothesis? • Data analysis: • Try to find a correlation between glitchrate during S4 and ??? • Compare detector status for good (low glitch rate) and bad time (high glitch rate). Anything different ? • Maybe the periodicity leads us to origin of the glitches ?
HACR: Burst and glitch analysis Take in 32 seconds of data Subdevide this into subsegments of 32 ms (Overlab of 28 ms) Windowing and FFT Index i = subsegment Index k = frequency bin Spectrogram (2-dim set of numbers / pixels) = mean Clustering = standard deviation = high threshold = 25 = low threshold = 5 Triggers