1 / 10

Federal Trade Commission ftc

Learn about the CAN-Spam Act of 2003 enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. Details new civil and criminal violations, enforcement by federal and state entities, rules for email compliance, and penalties for violations.

yorkr
Download Presentation

Federal Trade Commission ftc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Trade Commissionwww.ftc.gov FTC & Spam

  2. CAN-SPAM Act of 2003(“Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act”) • Effective date of January 1, 2004 • Creates civil and criminal violations • May be enforced by federal and state law enforcement and ISPs • Directs the FTC to establish rules, conduct studies, write reports Federal Trade Commission

  3. CAN-Spam Act: New Civil Violations • False or misleading header information • Deceptive subject lines • Failure to provide an opt-out method and honor opt-out requests • Failure to include: • Identification that the message is an advertisement • Sender’s valid physical postal address • For “sexually oriented” messages: • Failure to include warning label • Failure to require additional steps to view material after opening message Federal Trade Commission

  4. CAN-Spam Act: New Civil Violations • Aggravated violations for spam plus: • Harvesting • Dictionary attack • Using someone else’s computer without their authorization • Automated creation of multiple email accounts • FTC may specify other aggravated violations to cover practices contributing to the spam problem Federal Trade Commission

  5. CAN-Spam Act: Civil EnforcementFederal • FTC Enforcement: • Similar to FTC Act enforcement: Cease & desist orders and injunctive relief without proving knowledge • Plus, civil penalties up to $11,000 per violation: must show actual knowledge or knowledge fairly implied • Other federal regulators can enforce the Act against entities outside FTC jurisdiction • FCC will oversee regulation of wireless spam Federal Trade Commission

  6. CAN-Spam Act: Civil EnforcementState and Private • State Enforcement: • Injunctive relief • Damages: Actual loss or up to $250 per violation ($2 million cap, but not for false or misleading headers) • May receive treble damages for willful, knowing or aggravated violations • State spam laws are preempted unless they prohibit falsity or deception or are not spam-specific • ISP Enforcement: • Injunctive relief • Damages: Actual loss or up to $25 per violation ($1 million cap) • For false or misleading headers, up to $100 per violation and no cap • May receive treble damages for willful, knowing or aggravated violations • No private claim for spam recipient Federal Trade Commission

  7. CAN-Spam Act: New Criminal Violations • New criminal violations for spam-related unauthorized access and spoofing, and false header and email account information • Criminal penalties include imprisonment and forfeiture of assets Federal Trade Commission

  8. CAN-Spam Act: New Rules, Studies & Reports • Additional rules interpreting certain CAN-Spam provisions • Studies on the feasibility of: • Do-Not-Email Registry • Bounty system to promote enforcement • ADV Labeling • Report to Congress due in 1 year Federal Trade Commission

  9. Questions? Contact Elena Gasol Ramos Legal Advisor for international Consumer Protection US Federal Trade Commission Tel: 202 326 3102 egasolramos@ftc.gov Federal Trade Commission

  10. Federal Trade Commissionwww.ftc.gov FTC & Spam FTC Staff presentation. Does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or any individual Commissioner.

More Related