130 likes | 217 Views
Interdisciplinary Implementation of Quality Instruments for the Care of Residents with Dementia in Nursing Homes (InDemA). M. Halek, MScN; Prof. Dr. S. Bartholomeyczik 1 Researchteam: Institute of Nursing Science: D. Hardenacke, MScN; C. Krüger, MScN; Dr. H. Mayer
E N D
Interdisciplinary Implementation of Quality Instruments for the Care of Residents with Dementia in Nursing Homes (InDemA) M. Halek, MScN; Prof. Dr. S. Bartholomeyczik1 Researchteam: Institute of Nursing Science: D. Hardenacke, MScN; C. Krüger, MScN; Dr. H. Mayer Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine: Dr. S. Wilm1 , Dr. G. Bureick 1principal investigators
Initial situation • 60% to 90% of residents with dementia show some kind of challenging behaviour • Medical care of residents are provided by GP • Every resident has the right to choose “his” GP – the nurses have to deal with that • About half of carers in NH are registered nurses • Lack: • of knowledge ofdementia and dealing with challenging behaviour (nurses and GPs) • of collaboration and communication between nurses and physicians
Approaches on solution • For GPs: Dementia Guideline of the German Society for General and Family Medicine (DEGAM) (2008) • For nurses: „General recommendations for dealing with challenging behaviour in people with dementia in nursing homes“ (BMG 2007) • “Understanding diagnostics”: • Identification, description, measurement of challenging behaviour • Searching for triggers for behaviour: Need driven dementia compromised behaviour model (NDB-model) • Case conferences
Aims and research question Research question: Is it possible to improve nursing and medical care of residents in nursing homes by a parallel implementation of nursing and medical guidelines? Aims: • Improvement at the interface between nursing care and medical care of residents with dementia in nursing homes • Improvement of the care and living situation of people with dementia in nursing homes
Study Process • intervention study, pre-post-test design • May 2008 - February 2010 (22 month) • Goverment-Funded by The German Ministry of Health T0 T1 Training of key persons (nurses) (one day/ 8h) In-housetraining (nurses) one-time per unit/ 2 h Seven Case conferences per unit IdA as a guidance nurses +GPs Training of GPs, one-time/ 90 min. Peer outreach visits (one-time/45 min.) Information via mail Intervention (9 Month)
Main Outcomes and measurements • Residents: • improvement of quality of life: QUALIDEM • improvement of challenging behaviour: NPI-NH • Changes in neuroleptica (DDD), hospital admissions: Checklist for Resident’s records • Nurses and GPs: • improvement of the communication between nurses and general practitioners: Questionnaire • reduction of nurses‘ stress/burden: Questionnaire
Recruitment and sample 15 nursing homes, 24 units Residents contacted n=337 Nurses contacted n= 374 GP contacted n= 116 Participation in trainings n= 40 Exclusion criteria:Schizophrenia MMSE > 24 Living in Nursing Home min. 2 Month Participation in trainings n= 171 Inclusion criteria fulfilled n=166 Response rate (data collection) n= 151 Response rate (data collection) n= 40 Estimated sample size for 1st data collection N=183 Estimated sample size N=70 Estimated sample size N= 90
Cognition (MMSE): 64% of residents have a MMSE-Score < 10 Challenging behaviour (NPI-NH): Overall rate of challengingbehaviour: 90% (median 3 behaviours) Prevalence: Aggression/Agitation (50%), Irritability (42%), Apathy (41%), Depression (39%), Anxiety (39%) Frequency: frequently/very frequently: Aberrant motor behaviour (96%), Apathy (73%), Anxiety (66%) Severity: severe to moderate: Delusion (81%), Hallucination (72%), Aggression/Agitation (69%) Residents´ outcomes
Nurses´ Burden • Most stressing behaviour for nurses: • physical aggressive (40%) • Most stressful aspects: • “I haven't enough time for caring for these residents” 67% • “Because, I had to sedate they” 49% • Least stressful aspects (less than 20%): • “Feeling, to be threatened” • “That I don't understand, why the resident behave in this way” • “To be verbally insulted” • 40 % of nurses are not satisfied with the care of residents with dementia
Experiences with Case-Conferences • Up to date 50 Case Conferences took place • Participation: nurses, nurse assistants, sometimes resident’s family members, occupational therapists, rarely a neurologist • So far GPs did not participate
Residents status not as expected: Residents highly cognitive impaired High prevalence of challenging behaviour Collaboration between GPs and nurses: Differences between nurses reports and study data Nurses less dissatisfied as expected Missing participation of GPs: No problems with collaboration? Inappropriate time for case conferences? Discussion
Thank you very much for your attention! Margareta.Halek@uni-wh.de