260 likes | 420 Views
Uses and abuses of science journalism: introducing psychology students to empiricism . Ian Wells University of East London School of Psychology LONDON, E15 4LZ i.r.wells @uel.ac.uk Twitter: @PY1105. What influences students’ problems with the transition to HE ?.
E N D
Uses and abuses of science journalism: introducing psychology students to empiricism Ian Wells University of East LondonSchool of PsychologyLONDON, E15 4LZ i.r.wells@uel.ac.uk Twitter: @PY1105
What influences students’ problems with the transition to HE ?
(Harvey, Drew & Smith, 2006; Gorard, Smith, May, Thomas, Adnett & Slack, 2006) • social and academic integration • The mismatch between student expectations and their experiences • A lack of appropriate academic study skills
‘A lack of appropriate academic study skills’ • The ‘official’ approach • A ‘Study Skills’ Module • A prescribed ‘Skills’ Curriculum BUT
Study Skills that have already served students well may have to be ‘unlearnt’ (Chew, 2008) • Was the ‘Skills’ module delivering everything we wanted ? • Higher order Cognitive skills • ‘Critical Thinking’ • Empiricism or ‘Scientific Thinking’
The Problem of Transfer • Does training transfer from one domain to another ? (Barnett & Ceci, 2002) • Some evidence for particular teaching methods being successful (Nisbett, Fong, Lehmann & Cheng, 1987)
A new Level 1, 1st Semester Module • ‘Thinking Like a Psychologist’ • Separate from ‘Research Methods/Stats’ • Separate from the ‘official’ Skills module • Using examples of Science reporting from the popular press to illustrate the cognitive skills we want students to develop
Reading original sources • Just because it’s in a journal doesn’t mean it’s right • Need to constantly engage critical faculties
More complex Ideas • Experimental Control • The case of ‘Clever Hans’ • The story of Rom Houben
Results • The problem of assessment • Anecdotal • In-class assessment – Do they recognise similar issues ? • http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/Maggie-the-Dog-Does-Math
Performance on Cognitive Reflection Test (Frederick,2005) • Those taking the module v control group • t(86)=2.95, p=.01, alpha =.43
Performance on other modules • Those taking the module v control group • t(86)=2.25, p=01, alpha=.37
Summary • It appears to be working • This years 3rd year cohort will be the first to graduate having done the module • Developing an on-line database of examples • Twitter: @PY1105 • We need a measure of ‘scientific’ thinking