1 / 21

An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola

An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola. George Inglis. Research Goals. Haiti. Dominican Republic. Species Observed. E. abbotti E. alcoae E. audanti E. flavescens E. furcyensis E. glaphycompus E. haitianus E. heminota E. inoptatus E. montanus

yovela
Download Presentation

An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola George Inglis

  2. Research Goals Haiti Dominican Republic

  3. Species Observed • E. abbotti • E. alcoae • E. audanti • E. flavescens • E. furcyensis • E. glaphycompus • E. haitianus • E. heminota • E. inoptatus • E. montanus • Neiba (E. floresi / E. raetaliaarum) • E. oxyrhynchus • E. parabates • E. patriciae • E. pictissimus • E. ruthae • E. schmidti

  4. Methods of Study • Look for phylogenetic evidence • Find all available specimens • Map out locations • Compare the two (or more) species of frogs, try to find morphological differences • Measure to find growth ratio differences • Analyze frog calls (limited)

  5. E. furcyensis • Located in the Furcy area of Haiti, and nearby parts of the Dominican Republic. • Separated into the North and South slopes of the mountain range.

  6. South Slope North Slope

  7. E. furcyensis North Slope: • Gradual curve in odontophores • Bigger palmar, thenar • Tubercles along lower sides of venter • “Flat” round digital pads South Slope: • Sharply, more noticeably curved odontophores • Smaller palmar, thenar • No tubercles along lower side of venter • Circular digital pads

  8. E. furcyensis

  9. E. furcyensis • Morne la Visite • Thin, circular digital pads • Unique “lesion”-like marks along sides • Has ratio differences between other slopes

  10. E. furcyensis

  11. E. inoptatus • Geographically distributed all throughout Hispaniola, divided between the North and South parts of the island

  12. E. inoptatus South Island

  13. E. inoptatus • Larger frog, but very difficult to distinguish between North and South • No ratio differences, defining feature is questionable • Lots of polymorphic variation in both, covers all ranges

  14. E. inoptatus • Must turn to other determinant of speciation: frog calls • Use Raven to examine frog calls • Frequency • Duration • Have calls from one North inoptatus and six South • Some were release • Overall, 3 viable calls

  15. E. inoptatus • North: • Higher average frequency call, ≈3091 Hz • Call duration: .304 - .341 seconds • South: • Lower average frequency call, ≈1730-1920 Hz • Call duration: .400 - .535 seconds • There is potential, need more calls from Northisland frogs before can be sure

  16. Neiba Frogs • From Sierra de Neiba, Dominican Republic

  17. Neiba Frogs • Two new species of frogs (unrelated) • E. floresi • E. parabates, E. haitianus • E. raetaliaarum • E. schmidti • Currently no schmidtiin lab, so examining parabates and haitianus for comparison

  18. E. floresi • Distinct from both similar species • Vs. Haitianus • Head Length vs. Itnernareal • Head Width vs. Internareal • Internareal vs. S-V • Internareal vs. Radio-Ulna • Vs. Parabates • Internareal vs. S-V

  19. E. floresi • vs. Haitianus • Significantly smaller • Black vocal sacs in males • Has interocular marking • vs. Parabates • Significantly smaller • Thinner digital pads • Concave loreal region • Less prominent supratympanic bar and canthal lines

  20. Conclusion • Still a lot to do • Always need as large a sample size as possible • Look past simply the outward, physical differences

More Related