230 likes | 368 Views
An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola. George Inglis. Research Goals. Haiti. Dominican Republic. Species Observed. E. abbotti E. alcoae E. audanti E. flavescens E. furcyensis E. glaphycompus E. haitianus E. heminota E. inoptatus E. montanus
E N D
An Analysis of Eleutherodactylus Speciation in Hispaniola George Inglis
Research Goals Haiti Dominican Republic
Species Observed • E. abbotti • E. alcoae • E. audanti • E. flavescens • E. furcyensis • E. glaphycompus • E. haitianus • E. heminota • E. inoptatus • E. montanus • Neiba (E. floresi / E. raetaliaarum) • E. oxyrhynchus • E. parabates • E. patriciae • E. pictissimus • E. ruthae • E. schmidti
Methods of Study • Look for phylogenetic evidence • Find all available specimens • Map out locations • Compare the two (or more) species of frogs, try to find morphological differences • Measure to find growth ratio differences • Analyze frog calls (limited)
E. furcyensis • Located in the Furcy area of Haiti, and nearby parts of the Dominican Republic. • Separated into the North and South slopes of the mountain range.
South Slope North Slope
E. furcyensis North Slope: • Gradual curve in odontophores • Bigger palmar, thenar • Tubercles along lower sides of venter • “Flat” round digital pads South Slope: • Sharply, more noticeably curved odontophores • Smaller palmar, thenar • No tubercles along lower side of venter • Circular digital pads
E. furcyensis • Morne la Visite • Thin, circular digital pads • Unique “lesion”-like marks along sides • Has ratio differences between other slopes
E. inoptatus • Geographically distributed all throughout Hispaniola, divided between the North and South parts of the island
E. inoptatus South Island
E. inoptatus • Larger frog, but very difficult to distinguish between North and South • No ratio differences, defining feature is questionable • Lots of polymorphic variation in both, covers all ranges
E. inoptatus • Must turn to other determinant of speciation: frog calls • Use Raven to examine frog calls • Frequency • Duration • Have calls from one North inoptatus and six South • Some were release • Overall, 3 viable calls
E. inoptatus • North: • Higher average frequency call, ≈3091 Hz • Call duration: .304 - .341 seconds • South: • Lower average frequency call, ≈1730-1920 Hz • Call duration: .400 - .535 seconds • There is potential, need more calls from Northisland frogs before can be sure
Neiba Frogs • From Sierra de Neiba, Dominican Republic
Neiba Frogs • Two new species of frogs (unrelated) • E. floresi • E. parabates, E. haitianus • E. raetaliaarum • E. schmidti • Currently no schmidtiin lab, so examining parabates and haitianus for comparison
E. floresi • Distinct from both similar species • Vs. Haitianus • Head Length vs. Itnernareal • Head Width vs. Internareal • Internareal vs. S-V • Internareal vs. Radio-Ulna • Vs. Parabates • Internareal vs. S-V
E. floresi • vs. Haitianus • Significantly smaller • Black vocal sacs in males • Has interocular marking • vs. Parabates • Significantly smaller • Thinner digital pads • Concave loreal region • Less prominent supratympanic bar and canthal lines
Conclusion • Still a lot to do • Always need as large a sample size as possible • Look past simply the outward, physical differences