160 likes | 187 Views
Unravel the profound impact of Charles Guiteau's trial for President Garfield's assassination, with insights on his motives and the legal proceedings.
E N D
U.S. v. Guiteau From Complete History of the Trial of Guiteau (1882) Federal Trials and Great Debates in United States History
President Garfield • President James Garfield was elected in 1880. • He had been a general during the Civil War and had represented Ohio in Congress. • He became President when the Republican party was divided between two factions. President James Garfield
Stalwarts and Half-Breeds • “Stalwarts” wanted to continue existing policies and supported former President Ulysses Grant in 1880. • “Half-breeds” favored reform of the civil service and reconciliation with the South. They supported former House Speaker James Blaine. • Garfield was seen as a “compromise” candidate. • However, he angered many Stalwarts by refusing to appoint their preferred candidates. James Blaine
Charles Guiteau • Charles Guiteau was a failed lawyer and preacher from Illinois. • Many people who knew him believed he was “cranked,” or insane. • Guiteau tried to break into Republican politics in the 1880 election. • He delivered a minor speech supporting Garfield, but made little other impact. Charles Guiteau, ca. 1881
Charles Guiteau • Despite his lack of success, Guiteau believed he was responsible for Garfield’s victory. • He demanded important jobs from Garfield and Blaine (whom Garfield appointed Secretary of State). • Guiteau became obsessed with the divide in the party and believed Blaine had manipulated Garfield to betray the Stalwarts. Guiteau as a “model office seeker”
The Shooting • Guiteau claimed that God “pressured” him to “remove” Garfield. • On July 2, 1881, he shot Garfield twice in a Washington, D.C. train station. • The second shot entered Garfield’s back and lodged near his pancreas. Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper (1881)
Garfield’s Sickness • Garfield did not die immediately, but he was bedridden for the next few months. • Garfield’s doctors gave him questionable medical care. • The nation followed news of the President’s health closely, but much of this news was false. Doctors attending to Garfield
Garfield’s Sickness • In an attempt to allow Garfield to recover away from the heat in Washington, Garfield’s doctors moved him to the New Jersey shore. • He died there on Sept. 19 1881. Doctors attending to Garfield
Indictment and Lawyers • A Washington, D.C. grand jury indicted Guiteau on October 8, 1881. • Guiteau’s trial was held in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, which heard both federal and local cases. • He was represented by his brother-in-law, Illinois attorney George Scoville. • The case was prosecuted by leading attorneys from Washington and New York City. George Scoville
The Judge • Associate Justice Walter Cox presided over the trial. • Cox was concerned that Guiteau receive a fair trial. • He did not want the court to “rush” Guiteau“to the gallows.” • Many observers were initially critical of Cox, believing he should be firmer with Guiteau. Justice Walter Cox
The Prosecution Case • The prosecution called several eye witnesses who described the shooting. • The prosecution also introduced the testimony of several doctors and Guiteau’sacquaintences to rebut claims that he was insane. • At times, the prosecution was very aggressive. • One prosecutor called Guiteau “the most cold-blooded and selfish murderer of the last sixty centuries.” Prosecution attorney John Porter Courtesy: New York Court of Appeals
Guiteau’s Insanity Defense • Guiteau’s main argument was that he was pressured by God to kill Garfield. • He frequently interrupted court with wild outbursts. • Scoville argued that Guiteau was insane. • Although one leading doctor testified strongly on Guiteau’s behalf, this claim was strongly contested by the prosecution’s experts. Caricature of Guiteau’s defense
Justice Cox’s Insanity Ruling • Justice Cox applied a standard borrowed from English law to determine whether Guiteau was sane. • Under this standard, the jury had to determine whether Guiteau understood his actions and knew that what he doing was wrong. • Since Guiteau planned the attack and admitted he had some doubts about whether it was justified, he likely failed this test. Guiteau often behaved irrationally in court
Verdict and Sentence • After months of testimony and argument, the jury returned a “guilty” verdict in approximately an hour. • Justice Cox sentenced Guiteau to death. • Guiteau cursed the jury, the prosecution and Scoville. • He declared he would be President himself one day. Guiteau was hanged at the district jail in Washington, D.C.
Appeal and Execution • Both an appeal to three other judges and a habeas corpus petition to the Supreme Court failed. • Guiteau believed President Chester Arthur would pardon him because the assassination had “made” Arthur. • Arthur refused to pardon Guiteau, and he was hanged on June 30, 1882. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Bradley denied Guiteau’s writ for habeas corpus
Aftermath and Legacy • Many observers at the time celebrated the verdict in Guiteau and lauded Justice Cox’s fairness. • Nevertheless, some modern medical experts believe that Guiteau was insane. • A postmortem suggested that Guiteau may have suffered from syphilis, a disease that can affect the brain. • Some point to the trial as an example of the difficulty of dealing fairly with unpopular or controversial defendants.