1 / 16

Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcel in City of Petaluma, Sonoma County

Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcel in City of Petaluma, Sonoma County. Dan McElhinney Chief Deputy District Director Caltrans District 4. 1. LOCATION MAP. N. Project Location. To Santa Rosa. ROUTE 101. To San Francisco. Old Redwood Highway Interchange. OLD REDWOOD Hwy. 2.

yukio
Download Presentation

Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcel in City of Petaluma, Sonoma County

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcelin City of Petaluma, Sonoma County Dan McElhinney Chief Deputy District Director Caltrans District 4 1

  2. LOCATIONMAP N Project Location To Santa Rosa ROUTE 101 To San Francisco Old Redwood Highway Interchange OLD REDWOOD Hwy 2

  3. Project Location Petaluma Blvd North N Teuma Property Pepper Rd Stony Point Rd ROUTE 101 To San Francisco To Santa Rosa Petaluma Old Redwood Hwy 3

  4. Proposed Project Existing R/W To San Francisco Route 101 To Santa Rosa NB Loop On-Ramp NB On-Ramp Existing R/W R/W Proposed Teuma Property Old Redwood Highway ExistingDriveway N NB Off-Ramp Existing Right-of-Way Proposed Northbound On-Ramp Proposed Right-of-Way 4

  5. Proposed Project NB On-Ramp Proposed State R/W Teuma Property 101 Casino Showcase of Motorcars Old Redwood Highway N Quality Inn Proposed Fee Acquisition - 0.49 Acres Proposed TCE - 0.04 acres 5

  6. Existing State R/W Proposed Project Proposed State R/W NB On-Ramp Concrete Barrier Proposed Retaining Wall Teuma Property 101 Casino Showcase of Motorcars Old Redwood Highway N Quality Inn Width Within State R/W Available for Proposed Drainage Systems/Ditches Proposed Unpaved Slopes 6

  7. Aerial view of Teuma Property Route 101 To San Francisco To Santa Rosa Teuma Property Old Redwood Highway 7 7

  8. View From Southbound Route 101 Towards Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcel Teuma Property View from Southbound Route 101 towards Teuma Property 8

  9. View from Northbound Off-Ramp Towards Teuma Property N Teuma Property Old Redwood Highway NB Off-Ramp 9

  10. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • The Department’s project should be designedto avoid loss of visibility to this parcel 10

  11. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • The Department’s project should be designedto avoid loss of visibility to this parcel • The Department’s design minimizes impacts to the property. • Abutter’s rights were acquired in 1955. • Assertions on loss of visibility are compensation issues and would be addressed in court proceedings. 11

  12. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • Owner would like an on-premise sign to mitigate the loss of visibility. 12

  13. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • Owner would like an on-premise sign to mitigate the loss of visibility. • City of Petaluma sign ordinance, Section 20.150 prohibits installation of new signs. • A variance to the sign ordinance would need to be requested by the property owner and approved by City Council. 13

  14. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • Insufficient area for parking and emergency vehicle access on remainder. 14

  15. Related to the findings of the Commission: That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS: • Insufficient area for parking and emergency vehicle access on remainder. • Parking loss was included in the offer of just compensation. • The City of Petaluma Fire Marshall reviewed and approved the proposed right of way adjacent to the existing building. • The issues raised by the property owner relate only to compensation, and would be addressed in eminent domain proceedings. 15

  16. Summary • The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. • This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. • The property sought to be condemned is necessary for the proposed project. • An offer of just compensation has been made in accordance with G.C. 7267.2. 16

More Related