1 / 22

MSDII Managerial Review

MSDII Managerial Review. P10011 Rochester Institute of Technology 05/19/2010. Project Status. Flex Sensor Update Conceptually not fit for elbow Ergonomic issues. Infeasible implementation Pursue other uses of Flex. Project Status - Dan. Budget Risk Assessment Update Project Plan

yule
Download Presentation

MSDII Managerial Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MSDII Managerial Review P10011 Rochester Institute of Technology 05/19/2010

  2. Project Status • Flex Sensor Update • Conceptually not fit for elbow • Ergonomic issues • Infeasible implementation • Pursue other uses of Flex

  3. Project Status - Dan • Budget • Risk Assessment Update • Project Plan • Engineering Specs • Customer Satisfaction

  4. Risk Assessment • Risk: Patient cannot move naturally while using system • Would adulterate reported data • Reviewed results with Customer and Advisor • Mitigated during design phase by making people’s movements a design concern • Risk: Testing phase does not occur under realistic circumstances • Enclosures would not survive ‘real’ conditions • Exposed enclosures to expected usage • Mitigated by testing beyond overloading test conditions upon completion to find approximate factor of safety.

  5. Risk Assessment • Major Risk: Interfaces do not stay on patient • Sensor package reports useless data • Solution • Careful attention paid to making the system viable for patients with many body types • Mitigated by delivering multiple attachment styles

  6. Risk Assessment • Risk: Lack of communication between P10010 and P10011 • Incomplete Design • Failure to explore possibilities completely • Mitigated by ensuring regular between groups and/or bi-weekly meetings

  7. Success Evaluation • Areas of success: • Designed functional prototype • Tested several attachment techniques • Documented all results for future team • Areas of lack of success • Flex sensor implementation

  8. Joe Piehler • Punctual • Attended all relevant meetings, on time • Prepared to work on arrival • Thorough and Accurate • Test plan results recording • Majority of paper writing and proofreading • Communicative • Always available by text or e-mail • Professional and Ethical • Dedicated • Never asked more of the team than I was willing to do myself

  9. Joe Piehler • Test Plan • Designed majority of tests • Carried out many tests individually • Designed and updated results of testing • Project Plan • Updated as needed • Wrote majority of final paper

  10. Dan Shields • Punctual • Always attended meetings • Attended associated presentations when possible • Thorough and Accurate • Communicative • Hard to reach by email • Professional and Ethical • Dedicated • Underestimated project complexity • Overestimated my own productivity • I hate the flu • Stubbornness and Vindication Trap

  11. Dan Shields • Acquired materials • Pursued Informed suggestions for attachments • Performed concept testing • Lead attachment • Testing of enclosures

  12. Alex Frechette • Punctual • Always made necessary meetings • Not always present for Fridays, my work was complete for what the testing team needed on Fridays when testing was completed • Thorough and Accurate • Comprehensive manufacturing plan • Manufactured quality hard enclosures • Communicative • Easily assessable through email and phone • Professional and Ethical • Dedicated

  13. Alex Frechette • Hard Enclosure Manufacturing Lead • Learn Manufacturing techniques • Switching Materials • Modifications to design on fly • Delivering 6 enclosures Small Hard Enclosure

  14. Alex Frechette • Wearing units testing • Apply Knowledge to appropriate sections of paper • Loading Documents on Edge

  15. Deliverables Checklist • Manufacturing Plan • Updated Project Plan • Final BOM • Test Results • Updated Edge • Functional Prototypes • Paper • Poster • Foundation for Future Teams

  16. Alex – MSD I Lessons Learned • UniGraphics NX Software • Pushed to order materials at end of MSD I • Paid more attention to Material Selection • Polyethylene was chosen during BOM stage based on price and availability • Learned importance of the design process and documents • Project plan, selection process, • Ask questions during design process • Easier to ask questions early then make changes later • How to work as a team to complete deliverables

  17. Alex – MSD II Lessons Learned • Plan accordingly to meet deadlines for team • Parallel Manufacturing and testing • Value of finding the right tools • Polyethylene poor machining properties • Delrin is a much better choice • Communication with P10010 • Overall, learned how valuable the design process can be

  18. Dan - Lessons Learned • Overextended • 80% confidence • 20% whispering doubt, saying do more testing • Communication • Give honest critique • Speak Up • Reinforce Others • Limits • Organized Planning

  19. Joe – MSD I Lessons Learned • Communication • Recording information • Risk Assessment and Project Plan • More expertise needed earlier • Tradeoffs between academic and practical goals • Effectiveness of Design Process

  20. Joe – MSD II Lessons Learned • Communication! • Sliding scope of project • Facility Contingency • Earlier Flex testing

  21. Rubric Review

More Related