1 / 26

Representing Cloud Processes in the Simulation of Climate

Representing Cloud Processes in the Simulation of Climate. Cristiana Stan Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, Calverton MD 20705. Common biases in current generation of CGCMs. Errors in the precipitation distribution with

yves
Download Presentation

Representing Cloud Processes in the Simulation of Climate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Representing Cloud Processes in the Simulation of Climate Cristiana Stan Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, Calverton MD 20705

  2. Common biases in current generation of CGCMs • Errors in the precipitation distribution with • Second spurious Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) south of the equator in the eastern Pacific • Deficit or excessive precipitation distribution over the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool • ENSO with • Unrealistic amplitude • Period that is too long or too short • Regular occurrence • Weak ENSO-monsoon teleconnection • Misrepresentation of the MJO • Underestimation of the strength and coherence of convection and wind variability • Life cycle

  3. Where to Go? • Increase horizontal resolution? • Toward cloud processes resolving, MMF?

  4. TOA N E What is MMF*? AGCM domain CRM domain 4 Km DXCRM ~300 Km DXAGCM, DYAGCM * M. Khairoutdinov and D. Randall

  5. Models Configuration 1 semi-Lagrangian dynamical core 3 M. Khairoutdinov and D. Randall 2 finite-volume dynamical core 4 Neale et al., 2008

  6. Precipitation Simulation Boreal Winter Climatology CMAP: 1979–1998 Ctl-CCSM: 0004–0023 SP-CCSM: 0004–0023 HR-CCSM: 0016–0020

  7. Precipitation Simulation Boreal Summer Climatology CMAP: 1979–1998 Ctl-CCSM: 0004–0023 SP-CCSM: 0004–0023 HR-CCSM: 0016–0020

  8. Precipitation Bias(models: 004–0023; CMAP:1979–1998) SP-CCSM–CMAP Ctl-CCSM–CMAP DJF JJA

  9. Precipitation Bias(models:0016–0020; CMAP:1979–1998) SP-CCSM–CMAP HR-CCSM–CMAP DJF JJA

  10. SST Bias(models:0004–0023; HadlSST:1982–2001) SP-CCSM–HadlSST Ctl-CCSM–HadlSST DJF JJA

  11. SST Bias(models: 0016–0020; HadlSST:1982–2001) SP-CCSM–HadlSST HR-CCSM–HadlSST DJF JJA

  12. 20-degree Isotherm, 5S-5N(models: 0004–0023, Levitus: WAO 1998) Pacific Atlantic CCSM3.0 SP-CCSM Levitus Depth (m) Depth (m) CCSM3.0 SP-CCSM Levitus CCSM3.0 SP-CCSM Levitus Depth (m) Depth (m) CCSM3.0 SP-CCSM Levitus

  13. Tropical Cyclone Activity(models: 0004–0023, Obs:1980-2005) SP-CCSM Ctl-CCSM courtesy of K. Emanuel

  14. mm day-1 Indian MonsoonSummer Climatology (Precipitation, 850-hPa Wind) Ctl-CCSM (0004–0023) GPCP/NCEP Rean (1979–2003) SP-CCSM (0004–0023)

  15. Indian MonsoonSummer Climatology (200-hPa Temperature, Wind) Ctl-CCSM (0004–0023) NCEP Rean (1979–2003) SP-CCSM (0004–0023) K

  16. ENSO SimulationNiño-3.4 (5S–5N,150W–90W) HadSST(1981–2003) SP-CCSM (0002–0023) Ctl-CCSM(0002–0023) year

  17. ENSO SimulationNiño-3.4 (5S–5N,150W–90W) 48 months 30 months 24 months

  18. SSTA Regression with Niño3.4 SP-CCSM (0002–0023) HadlSST (1948–1998) Ctl-CCSM (0002–0023)

  19. ENSO-Monsoon RelationshipIMR (JJA), SSTA(DJF+1) SP-CCSM (0002–0023) HadlSST/ GPCP (1951–2004) Ctl-CCSM (0002–0023)

  20. Intraseasonal VariabilityPrecipitation Ctl-CCSM GPCP SP-CCSM courtesy of C. DeMott, CSU

  21. MJO SimulationPhase composites of the OLR dominant MJO mode(models: 0004–0023; NOAA: 1979–2007) Ctl-CCSM NOAA SP-CCSM W/m2 6 4.5 3 1.5 0 -1.5 -3 -4.5 -6 courtesy of V. Krishnamurthy

  22. ENSO-MJO Relationship Ctl-CCSM OBS SP-CCSM MJO Index* TAUX Anom MJO Index* TAUX Anom MJO Index* TAUX Anom -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 N/m2 *CLIVAR definition

  23. Diurnal Variability of PrecipitationJJA Climatology % of days with precip Time of prec-freq. max Ctl-CCSM SP-CCSM Dai (2001) courtesy of C. DeMott, CSU

  24. Conclusions • Replacing the cloud process parameterizations with embedded CRMs improves some of the known shortcomings of the CCSM • Better simulation of precipitation distribution • Reduced SST biases • Small errors in the thermocline simulation • On interannual time-scales, the SP-CCSM produces an improved (ENSO) with irregular frequency of events and realistic symmetry between the warm and cold phases • On seasonal time-scales, the SP-CCSM simulates an improved mean monsoon with variability at ENSO time-scale

  25. Conclusions • On intra-seasonal time-scales, the SP-CCSM simulates a realistic MJO • In the control model, the parameterization of convection results in weak convective anomalies in the Indian Ocean that cannot propagate beyond the Maritime Continent and decay before reaching the central Pacific Ocean • A better representation of clouds yields to alternating “active” periods of enhanced convection and “break” periods of reduced convection over the Indian Ocean are in agreement with the observations, as are their eastward and meridional propagation • SP-CCSM simulates an improved diurnal cycle of precipitation especially over the land-surface. • Unparameterized convection leads to a better simulation of the high-frequency stochasting forcing acting at the air-sea interface • increased MJO activity –––> enhanced and frequent westerly wind bursts –––> improved ENSO • Resolution combined with explicit representation of cloud processes are both needed!

  26. Future Plans • Understand the improvements in the simulation of tropical variability • Evaluate the role of surface fluxes and small scale convective processes • Investigate the role of high-frequency SST variability on the simulation of the MJO • Simulate a CMIP 5 climate scenario with 1%/year CO2 increase • Analyze the response of the Earth’s climate to increase greenhouse levels • Evaluate how ENSO and Monsoons and other low frequency modes may change in a changing climate • New simulation with improved versions of the CCSM and CRM • Use the finite volume dynamical core in the atmospheric model • Use the ocean model with 1 deg horizontal resolution • A new version of the flux coupler which permits higher frequency of coupling • The latest version of the CRM with improved microphysics • Use SP-CCSM as a prediction tool • Collaboration with the YOTC program

More Related