1 / 10

Approaches to Security and Reality of the North Caucasus or How Theories of Security can explain Caucasian conflicts?

Approaches to Security and Reality of the North Caucasus or How Theories of Security can explain Caucasian conflicts? . Main approaches …. The realist perspective The liberalist perspective Peace studies Critical security studies Human security Securitization ???.

yvon
Download Presentation

Approaches to Security and Reality of the North Caucasus or How Theories of Security can explain Caucasian conflicts?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Approaches to Security and Reality of the North CaucasusorHow Theories of Securitycan explain Caucasian conflicts?

  2. Main approaches … • The realist perspective • The liberalist perspective • Peace studies • Critical security studies • Human security • Securitization • ???

  3. The Realist approach(analysts from Ancient times to Hobbes, Machiavelli, Rousseau) • States preoccupied with physical safety. • State preoccupation with autonomy. • National development mainly as a means, helping sustain and strengthen state autonomy and safety. • Rule is primary important instrumentally (foreign challenges meet to the state’s autonomy and safety).

  4. The liberalist perspective(since Enlightenment) • States are not unitary actors. • Cooperation and interdependence between states and societies. • The behaviour oа sates in international politics is shaped by the character of states, their political system, and their society. • More optimistic about security than the realists

  5. Peace studies(after the Second World War) • Provide a non-state centric and more global view of major issues of conflict. • Idea of underlying causes of conflict. • Interest in conflict prevention, conflict resolution and peacekeeping. • Multi-level analysis from the individual to the international.

  6. Critical security studies(since the end of 20th century) • Idea of referent object of security (human beings are both secured and rendered insecure in different ways). • Five sectors of Security: military, environmental, economic, societal, and political (Barry Buzan, 1980s) • Security is more than military security (how security to be archived , both for the state and for any other referent objects). • Constructivist approach (society and security as social constructs)

  7. Human security • Human-centric tradition that emphasize on wide variety of threats to people’s security. • Ignores external military threats (argues that 95% deaths are caused by internal conflicts). • Human insecurity as political violence and as underdevelopment (poor governance, poor state capacity, corruption, social cleavages).

  8. Securitization(Copenhagen School) • ‘Is the move that takes politics beyond the established rules of the game and frames the issue either as a special kindofpolitics or as above politics’ (Buzan). • ‘SPEECH ACT’ - Usage of a language of security (from language to meaning)

  9. Thanks for discussion

More Related