210 likes | 218 Views
This paper discusses the characteristics of blazars, microvariability, and the observation results and analysis of BL Lac object S5.0716+714. It explores the multi-waveband correlations and different variability timescales, as well as the importance of studying microvariability in estimating the size of the emission region and understanding different radiation mechanisms.
E N D
The Optical Microvariability of the BL Lacertae Object S5 0716+714 and Its Multi-waveband Correlations Poon Helen Beijing Normal University
Outline • Characteristics of Blazars • Introduction to Microvariability • Observation Details • Observation Results and Analysis • Multi-Waveband Correlations
Characteristics of Blazars • Highly Variable and polarized • Jet <10°(unified model of AGN) • Different Variability Timescales • Subclasses - BL Lac Objects: weak/no emission lines in spectrum -Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars:clear emission lines in spectrum
Introduction to Microvariability • microvariability/intranight optical variability,INOV • first discovered in the 60s(Matthews & Sandage (1963)) • Coverage of microvariability of BL Lac objects ~ 80%(Heidt & Wagner (1996)) • Spectral changes - bluer-when-brighter(BWB) - redder-when-brigher (RWB) - no spectral change
Reasons for Microvariability • external reasons: • interstellar scintillation • microlensing • geometric effect (lighthouse effect) • no spectral change • internal reasons: • shock-in-jet model • perturbations of accretion disk spectral changes
Importance of Studying Microvariability • shortest timescalesestimation of the size of the emission region R ≤ cΔt • spectral changes and shape of lightcurves different radiation and light variation mechanisms
S5 0716+714 • BL Lac object • ra:07:21:53.447 dec:+71:20:36.35 (2000) • highly active(duty cycle~ 1) • magnitude: R ~ 12-15 mag • spectral changes - bluer-when-brighter - no spectral change - redder-when-brighter
Observation Details • Telescope used:Xinglong 85 cm reflector Camera:PI 1024 BFT,1024 x 1024 pixels FOV:16’.5 x 16’.5 • Observation Period:25-30 Oct, 2008 23-29 Dec, 2008 3-10 Feb, 2009 • Valid data: 14 days • Filters used: BVRI
Data Reduction • Bias, dark, flat correction • IRAF apphot package • comp:star 5 (Villata et al.(1998)) check:star 6 • flux calibration • photometric error ~ 0.003 – 0.015
Amplitude ~ 0.4mag(1st) ~ 0.5mag(2nd) ~ 0.8mag(3rd) outburst 1st:JD 2454766 R ∼ 13. 01 mag 2nd:JD 2454825 R ∼ 13.16 mag 3rd: JD 2454825 R ∼ 13.16 mag 4th:JD 2454867 R ∼ 12. 95 mag Lightcurves(R band)
- microvariability: 13/14 days (C > 2.576) - Amplitude (R band) ~0.004 – 0.28 mag - R ~ 12.95 – 13.64 mag
2008-12-24 VRI amplitude~ 0.14mag Color-magnitude diagram r(Pearson correlation coefficient) = 0.618 Bluer when brighter Variation mechanism internal reason? shock-in-jet model? microvariability-2008-12-24
2008-12-25 BVRI amplitude~ 0.09 mag CMD r = 0.150 Variation mechanism external reason ? geometric effect? microvariability-2008-12-25
Summary • Very active during observation, 4 outbursts observed • Microvariability observed:13 out of 14 days • Microvariability amplitude~ 0.004 – 0.28 mag • BWB shock-in-jet model; no spectral change geometric effect
Multi-waveband Correlations • Importance: spectral energy distributions(SEDs), multiwavelength correlations blazar physics emission models • Method: simultaneous multiwavelength observations
Blazar Models • Synchrotron Self Compton(SSC) model: - Gamma rays are produced by relativistic electrons via inverse Compton scattering of the synchrotron photons in the jet • External Compton(EC) model: - IC scattering of photons originating outside the jet (e.g.accretion disk , broad line region , CMB)
SED of S5 0716+714 • Red (2008 April data) • Gray (historical data) • Solid line (one-zone SSC model) • Dashed line (spine-layer model) • From Anderhub et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 129 • Source state: high flux both in the optical and gamma ray band - Better fit? SSC or spine-layer model?
From Tagliaferri et al., 2003, A&A, 400, 477 • All data taken when the source was in a bright state • Better fit? SSC only or SSC + EC model?
From Vittorini et al., 2009, ApJ, 7106, 1433 • Modelling of SED of two flares • One-component SSC model: simplest SSC model • Two-component SSC model: one component for slowly variable raido and hard X-ray bands and the other for faster variable optical, soft X- and γ-ray bands
Summary • Different models at different times and states • Simultaneous observation necessary to understand the physics and constrain models.