90 likes | 221 Views
draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01-txt “NAS-Traffic-Rule Attribute”. Bernard Aboba Farid Adrangi Paul Congdon Avi Lior Mauricio Sanchez. draft-ietf-radext-filter-05-txt “NAS-Filter-Rule Attribute”. Bernard Aboba Paul Congdon Mauricio Sanchez IETF 67 – San Diego, CA. Agenda.
E N D
draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01-txt “NAS-Traffic-Rule Attribute” Bernard Aboba Farid Adrangi Paul Congdon Avi Lior Mauricio Sanchez draft-ietf-radext-filter-05-txt“NAS-Filter-Rule Attribute” Bernard Aboba Paul Congdon Mauricio Sanchez IETF 67 – San Diego, CA
Agenda • Draft Comparison • draft-ietf-radext-filter-05-txt • Status • Next steps • draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01-txt • Status • Next steps
Draft Comparison draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01 • Two Attributes • NAS-Traffic-Rule • Acct-NAS-Traffic-Rule • Based on Diameter’s IPFilterRule format • Provides more functionality than IPFilterRule • More rule types • More actions draft-ietf-radext-filter-05 • One Attribute • NAS-Filter-Rule • Uses Diameter’s IPFilterRule format verbatim • Provides the same functionality as IPFilterRule and NAS-Filter-Rule AVP
“NAS-Filter-Rule” status • Five new draft versions since IETF66 • Resolved issues • I199: Attribute Length • I202: Diameter-RADIUS GW Behavior not Specified • Open issues, quickly reaching closure • I198: Attribute Concatenation/splitting
I198: Attribute Concatenation/Splitting • Base questions • How to split a long rule across multiple rules? • Allow multiple rules within one attribute? • Proposals • Over half dozen since IETF 65 • Usage of ‘tag’ field was favorite out of IETF 66 • Current: No ‘tag’ field; use only NULL between rules; Flexible rules on how rules can be placed into attributes
“NAS-Filter-Rule” Next Steps • Reach consensus of changes due to I198 in draft -05 • Take -05 to WG last call
“NAS-Traffic-Rule” Status • No new drafts since IETF 65… • Still waiting on comment response from issue submitters • Will follow up individually…again
draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01-txt Open Issues • I111 – Accounting (Greg W.) • Mostly closed; Awaiting for insight from 3GPP reps • I114 – NAS-Filter-Rule Accounting (Bernard A.) • Awaiting Bernard’s response to proposal from Jan/10/06 • Diameter Compatibility • I130 – Diameter Interoperability (Bernard A.) • I164 – Review (Jari A.) • Presented proposal at IETF 65; Consensus reached • I169 – Handling unparseable rules (Greg W.) • Awaiting Greg’s response to proposal from June/22/06 • I170 – Precedence and Order for NAS-Filter-Rule (Greg W.) • Discussion ongoing; Discussed proposal at IETF 65; Need group consensus of propsal • I192 – Comments (Jouni K.) • Editorial changes made in -01 draft; Awaiting Jouni’s response to proposal from June/24/06
“NAS-Traffic-Rule” Next Steps • Solution consensus of open issues over next couple of weeks • New version (-02) within month • Kickstart draft-ietf-radext-redirection-00 draft