1 / 26

Kevin A. Powell P.E. Florida Area Engineer Mobile Engineering District

Military and Civil Works Construction Programs “ Transformation and a look to the future” Construction Management Association of America. Kevin A. Powell P.E. Florida Area Engineer Mobile Engineering District US Army Corps of Engineers 04 May 2010.

zagiri
Download Presentation

Kevin A. Powell P.E. Florida Area Engineer Mobile Engineering District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Military and Civil Works Construction Programs “Transformation and a look to the future”Construction Management Association of America Kevin A. Powell P.E. Florida Area Engineer Mobile Engineering District US Army Corps of Engineers 04 May 2010

  2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Mission Statement The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) serves the Armed Forces and the Nation by providing vital engineering services and capabilities, as a public service, across the full spectrum of operations-- from peace to war--in support of national interests. Corps missions include five broad areas: -Water Resources - Environment - Infrastructure - Homeland Security - Warfighting These capabilities are complementary and reinforcing. For example, employees working on water resources projects on our Nation's waterways have deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan and applied their technical skills to support the warfighter.

  3. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers HQ FY10 Military Program  $ 24.8 BIL  11,700 personnel  Military Construction  Contingency Operations Installation Support  International and Interagency Support FY10 Civil Works Program  $ 7.9 BIL  24,900 personnel  Navigation  Hydropower  Flood Damage Reduction  Shore Protection  Water Supply  Regulatory  Recreation 9 Divisions ( Direct Funded ) 46 Districts ( Project Funded ) Homeland Security  Environmental  Real Estate Private Industry Partners Engineer Commands Engineer Research and Development Center $ 1 BIL @ Seven ( 7 ) diverse research laboratories

  4. USACE Divisions and Districts Seattle Europe Walla-Walla Portland St. Paul Northwestern Division Great Lakes and Ohio River Division North Atlantic Division New England Buffalo Mississippi Valley Division New York Omaha Detroit Philadelphia Sacramento Pittsburgh Chicago Rock Island Baltimore Kansas City San Francisco South Pacific Division Norfolk St. Louis Huntington Louisville Little Rock Tulsa Nashville Los Angeles Wilmington Memphis Albuquerque Southwestern Division Charleston South Atlantic Division Savannah Vicksburg Jacksonville Far East Fort Worth Mobile New Orleans Alaska Galveston Japan Honolulu Gulf Region Division ( GRD ) Afghanistan Engineer District ( AED ) Pacific Ocean Division

  5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military ProgramsProviding infrastructure solutions to the Armed Forces and the Nation Deliver innovative, resilient and sustainable infrastructure solutions in support of military readiness and strategic national interests. Community Hospital, FT Belvoir, VA Army Strategic Command HQ, Peterson AFB, CO Military Construction Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Installation Support Border Fence, Imperial Sand Dunes, CA BRAC 133 Mark Center, Arlington, VA Environmental/ Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Interagency & International Services (IIS) Real Estate HAAN Bridge, FT Bliss, TX BAF to Kabul Road, Afghanistan

  6. Army Imperatives IMPERATIVES FACILITIES SUPPORT • Family Housing • Barracks • Quality of Life • Warrior Care and Transition Program (WCTP) • Soldier Family Action Plan (SFAP) Sustain the Army’s Soldiers, Families, and Civilians SUSTAIN PREPARE Sustain the Army’s Soldiers, Families, and Civilians • Mission and Training • Training Barracks • Grow the Army RESET Sustain the Army’s Soldiers, Families, and Civilians Increase dwell time after deployments to Revitalize Soldiers and Families TRANSFORM Sustain the Army’s Soldiers, Families, and Civilians • GTA/BRAC/GDPR • Army Modular Force

  7. $84.7B MILCON/BRAC Requirements FY04 - 13 March 2010 7

  8. FY10 MILCON OVERVIEW • $15.7B FY10 program to execute for Army, AF and DOD (including FY09 Carryover & FY10 Supplemental) MILCON: • FY10 Army MILCON – 275 projects/$5.1B • FY10 AF MILCON – 131 projects/$2.0B • FY10 DOD MILCON – 58 projects/$2.3B • Potential MILCON Plus-up in FY10 Supplemental – 13 projects/$0.2B • FY09 and prior program carryover – 134 projects/$3.5B BRAC • FY10 BRAC (Army, AF, DOD) – 92 projects/$2.8B Remaining American Restoration and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA) projects • Ft Hood, Hospital Phase 1($621M) – scheduled award 30 Sep 10 • Army projects (3) – Warrior in Transition at Ft Eustis ($9.7M), Child Development Center at Ft Polk ($9.0M), and Family Housing at Ft McCoy ($4M) • Air Force projects (2) – Child Development Center at Tinker AB ($$11.2M) and Dormitory at Minot AB ($22M) • FSMR - 46 projects @ $73.8M

  9. FY11 MILCON Overview • FY11 Budget Overview Document can be found at: • http://comptroller.defense.gov/Budget2011.html • Links to Budget Materials: US Army Budget Documentation, US Air Force Budget Documentation, and Defense Wide Budget Documentation • http://asafm.army.mil/Documents/OfficeDocuments/Budget/BudgetMaterials/FY11/milcon//mca-afh-hoa.pdf • http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudget/fy2011/budget_justification/pdfs/07_Military_Construction/11-TMA.pdf • Potential USACE FY11 MILCON $7.5B • Divisions with the largest program • North Atlantic Division – 61 projects / $1,844M (includes Europe) • South Atlantic Division – 53 projects / $1,421M • Transatlantic Division – 49 projects / $986 M • South West Division – 37 projects / $817M

  10. FY11 MILCON Funding Overview • BRAC • FY10 fully funds BRAC construction • FY11 completes final non-Construction activities – Personnel and Unit movement • MILCON • Army • Completes all Warrior in Transition Complexes; only 1 in FY11 remaining, Ft Eustis • Army Family Housing • The originally planned Army Housing Privatization Program will be complete at 44 installations in FY10 • Air Force • 39 Projects / $808.3M • DOD • Medical: 15 projects / $795M • Others: $839M

  11. FY11 MILCON Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) • Support to our Soldiers conducting contingency operations in Afghanistan • Army • 48 projects ($762.0M) in support of Operation Enduring Freedom: Troop Housing, Dining Facilities, Logistics and Environmental Management facilities, Airfield Facilities, Command and Control Facilities, and Force Protection • Air Force: 6 projects / $173.8M • Unspecified Minor Military Construction, Army: $78.3M

  12. FY10-11 PROJECTED INTERNATIONAL WORKLOAD $MILLION 746 100 86 802 2,307 3,451 3,283 3,867 FY10 FY11 $7.0B $7.6B

  13. Lock and Dam 15 ( Mississippi River ) Dredge ESSAYONS ( Coos Bay, OR ) Hydropower Navigation Flood Risk Management Ecosystem Restoration Flood Wall ( Williamson, KY ) Water Supply Regulatory Agency for Wetlands and US Waters Natural Resources Management Disaster Preparedness and Response Everglades Bonneville II Powerhouse ( Washington ) USACE Civil Works ProgramsFY10 = $ 5.445 BIL Civil Works Mission Deliver enduring, comprehensive, sustainable, and integrated solutions to the Nation’s water resources and related challenges through collaboration with our stakeholders ( Regions, States, localities, Tribes, other Federal agencies ) Lake Seminole ( Mobile District )

  14. Civil Works Program Overview Support for Others ( Reimbursable ) ARRA Funds Flood Control Miss. R. & Tribs. Non-Federal Cost Sharing FUSRAP Investigations Expenses Flood & Coastal Emergencies & Regulatory Operation & Maintenance Construction 14

  15. Budgets and Appropriations FY09 FY10 FY10 FY 11 Approp. Budget Approp. Budget Investigations 168 100 160 104 Operation & Maint. 2,202 2,504 2,400 2,361 Construction 2,142 1,718 2,031 1,690 Mississippi River & Tribs. 384 248 340 240 Regulatory Program 183 190 190 193 Flood Cont. & Coastal Emerg. 0 41 0 30 F.U.S.R.A.P. 140 134 134 130 Expenses 179 184 185 185 ASA(CW) 4 6 5 6 Total Regular 5,361 5,125 5,445 4,939 Supplemental Approps. 6,558 Stimulus Bill 4,600 Total 16,520 *

  16. FY11 Budget by Business Line $34 M $195 M $280 M $193 M $1,549 M $824 M $207 M $1,653 M

  17. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Navigation Major Construction Projects( $10 M or More in FY11 Budget ) 137 Columbia R. Fish Mitigation Garrison Dam 11 Missouri R. Fish & Wildlife Recovery 78 Upper Mississippi River Restoration 21 Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration Emsworth Lock & Dam 57 NY / NJ Harbor 40 78 McCook & Thornton Reservior 12 Dover Dam 12 Folsom Dam 10 36 Little Calumet River 20 Hamilton Airfield Wetlands Restoration 10 Sacramento River Bank Protection Olmsted Lock & Dam 136 134 15 Bluestone Lake Clearwater Lake 40 Wolf Creek Dam 78 Santa Ana River Mainstem 25 Center Hill Dam Rio Grande Floodway 24 10 Canton Lake Mississippi River Levees 29 Mississippi River Channel Improvement 47 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR 40 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR 12 17 Lower Colorado River Basin Flood Risk Management 105 10 Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration Herbert Hoover Dike Dade County 180 11 South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Hydropower

  18. Where our CM Contract support is Seattle COL Tony Wright Europe COL John Kem Walla-Walla LTC Mike Farrell Portland COL Steve Miles 56 St. Paul COL Jon Christensen Northwestern Division BG Bill Rapp Great Lakes and Ohio River Division BG John Peabody North Atlantic Division BG Todd Semonite New England COL Tom Feir Buffalo LTC Dan Snead Mississippi Valley Division BG Mike Walsh 165 New York COL Nello Tortora Detroit LTC James Davis Omaha COL Dave Press Philadelphia LTC Tom Tickner Sacramento COL Tom Chapman Pittsburgh COL Mike Crall Chicago COL Vince Quarles 50 Rock Island COL Bob Sinkler Baltimore COL Pete Mueller San Francisco LTC Laurence Farrell Kansas City COL Roger Wilson 100 South Pacific Division COL Janice Dombi Norfolk COL Dan Anninos Huntington COL Dana Hurst St. Louis COL Tom O’Hara Louisville COL Keith Landry Little Rock COL Ed Jackson Tulsa COL Tony Funkhouser Nashville LTC Bernard Lindstrom Los Angeles COL Tom Magness Wilmington COL Jeff Ryscavage Memphis COL Tom Smith Albuquerque LTC Kim Colloton Southwestern Division BG Ken Cox Charleston LTC Trey Jordan South Atlantic Division MG Todd Semonite 60 Savannah COL Ed Kertis Vicksburg COL Mike Wehr 343 73 Jacksonville COL Paul Groskruger Far East COL Dave Turner Fort Worth COL Chris Martin Mobile COL Byron Jorns New Orleans COL Al Lee Alaska COL Kevin Wilson 17 Galveston COL Dave Weston Japan COL Barrett Holmes Honolulu LTC Jon Chytka Pacific Ocean Division BG Mark Yenter

  19. Future Outlook “Focus on Technology” • Design and Construction - continual improvement • Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) • Adapt Build • BIM • High Performance Buildings • Green Buildings - LEED – silver or better • Air tightness – setting the industry standard • Net Zero Energy Buildings - EO 13514 - “Built/Leased after 2020 achieve net zero energy by 2030” • Life Cycle Cost Analysis • Energy Conservation/Independence/Renewable Energy • Executive Orders, EPACT05, EISA 2007

  20. Mandatory Energy Technologies Waterless urinals East-West Building Orientation to extent practical Infiltration tighter than .25 cfm/sqft at 75 PA Added wall and roof insulation Windows with better U value/ E coating Lighting- lower power density & occupancy sensors Electrical usage metering Premium efficiency motors Energy Star or FEMP rated equipment High Efficiency mechanical equipment Thermostat setback/setforward Optimize HVAC zones (schedule/occupancy) Low flow plumbing fixtures Future Outlook (continued)“Focus on Technology”

  21. Future Outlook (continued)“Focus on Technology” Energy Technologies for Enhanced Performance Cool Roof Day lighting Windows- South overhang Doors- better U value Higher efficiency ductwork HVAC or ventilation heat recovery systems Demand controlled ventilation Radiant heating in maintenance bays Induction & LED exterior lighting Energy Technologies requiring Life Cycle Cost Analysis Solar domestic hot water Ground coupled heat pumps Central heating and/or chiller plant Photo voltaic panels Wind power Gray water systems Drain water heat recovery systems Thermal storage systems Radiant cooling

  22. Military Net Zero Energy Building ExampleAmmunition Storage - Ft. Irwin, CA Key Features: • 6,250 ft2 prefabricated steel building • Roof mounted 2.3 kW solar photovoltaic (PV) system • Solar panels are connected to a battery bank for power storage Performance: • Total installed electrical building costs are $62,000 whereas traditional building would have cost $74,000 • Net Zero saves about $1000/year in electric utility costs.

  23. Renewable Installation Technology Transition Program (ITTP) Demos Building Integrated Photovoltaic Roof (BIPV) Ft Huachuca Integrate photovoltaic material with conventional membrane roofing Deployable-Renewable Energy Power Station (DREPS), Ft Irwin Provide remote off-grid facilities with sustainable renewable energy,

  24. Future Outlook - Acquisition • Increased (public) transparency on use of funds/ detailed information for the public via government websites. • Intensive (electronic) reporting on all expended funds/Government and Private Sector “recipients” reports. • Increased focus on competition in acquisitions/spotlight on non-competitive acquisitions. • Even greater preference for firm-fixed price contracts/contract vehicles which minimize schedule, cost and performance risk to government, over cost type contracts. • Continued and enhanced efforts to increase small business participation in DoD acquisitions. • Potential for increased oversight by Government auditors (AAA, DoD IG, Engineer IG, etc.)

  25. Doing business with us - Directorate of Contracting website: http://www.usace.army.mil/CECT/Pages/Home.aspx Contractors must be in Central Contractor Registration www.ccr.gov All solicitations posted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) www.fedbizopps.gov Make sure certifications are up-to-date and in correct data bases HUBZone, SBD, 8(a), etc. see http://sba.gov/ Make sure bonding is in place (for construction projects) Do your homework: Know how your capabilities fit our requirements Consider subcontracting opportunities as well as prime contracts Doing Business With USACE

  26. Discussion

More Related