1 / 27

Language-based Implementation of Multi-Vendor Support in an AdvancedTCA Shelf Manager

Language-based Implementation of Multi-Vendor Support in an AdvancedTCA Shelf Manager. Sergey Zhukov. Introduction. Auriga/Pigeon Point Systems (PPS) collaboration Dedicated engineering team for more than 10 years

zaina
Download Presentation

Language-based Implementation of Multi-Vendor Support in an AdvancedTCA Shelf Manager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language-based Implementation of Multi-Vendor Support in an AdvancedTCA Shelf Manager Sergey Zhukov

  2. Introduction • Auriga/Pigeon Point Systems (PPS) collaboration • Dedicated engineering team for more than 10 years • Specialized in management for telecommunications systems based on open standards • Current project: management for AdvancedTCA systems • AdvancedTCA (ATCA) – an open standard for multi-board systems (shelves) used in telecommunications, developed by PICMG standards body in 2003 • AdvancedTCA boards can be single-board computers or specialized boards (DSPs, storage boards) • Shelf can host boards from different vendors • Management based on IPMI management specification from Intel • MicroTCA – a smaller form-factor variant of AdvancedTCA for use in other areas (industry, medical)

  3. Management Architecture in AdvancedTCA

  4. Pigeon Point Shelf Manager • Hardware and software solution for management in AdvancedTCA shelves • Implemented on a small mezzanine single-board computer (ShMM) • Runs embedded Linux • Shelf Management software runs as a user-mode application • Needs vendor-specific carrier board to plug into the shelf • Interface between a carrier board and a shelf is vendor-specific • Device population of a carrier board is vendor-specific • Shelf Manager operates with carrier boards and shelves from different vendors

  5. An AdvancedTCA Shelf with Shelf Manager

  6. Shelf Manager Software Adaptation Problem • To provide multi-vendor support, Shelf Manager software needs adaptation to a specific carrier and/or shelf • Previously: carrier- and shelf-specific pieces of code in the Shelf Manager software • Does not scale well when number of supported vendors grows, which happened over time • However the most practical solution for not very powerful original ShMMs • But in newer ShMM models processing power increased • A language-based solution to this problem has been introduced

  7. Language-Based Solution • Define a language for describing carrier and shelves • Hardware Platform Definition Language - HPDL • Each language unit (module) describes a carrier or a shelf • Created by PPS engineers or by shelf/carrier vendors • Modules compiled into binary format by a special compiler • Binary format loaded and interpreted by the Shelf Manager software

  8. Storing Binary HPDL modules • Preferred location – Carrier or Shelf FRU Information storage • AdvancedTCA/IPMI standard storage • Collocated with the respective carrier or shelf • Coexists with other (standard) records that describe carrier and shelf • Carrier and shelf become self-describing • Stored together with sensor data records (SDRs) • SDRs are standardized descriptions of IPMI sensors • Shelf Manager uses HPDL descriptions and SDRs together

  9. HPDL Features • Describes following objects: • Shelf Manager carrier board • Other modules on the carrier board (mezzanines, RTMs) • Non-intelligent modules in the shelf under direct control of the Shelf Manager (power supplies, fan trays, alarm panels) • I/O devices on the carrier board and in the shelf, controlled by the Shelf Manager (mostly I2C devices) • For each device, accessible signals and expressions over these signals are defined • IPMI sensors on the carrier board and in the shelf, bound to I/O devices, signals and expressions

  10. HPDL Object Hierarchy

  11. Describing FRUs • FRU as an object is defined in the AdvancedTCA specification • Hot swappable: can be replaced dynamically • Power Management: dynamically powered on and off • Supports other AdvancedTCA features – payload reset, etc. • Carrier board, non-intelligent modules, mezzanines are represented as FRUs • In HPDL, described via “FRU” statement with subordinate clauses and sub-statements • Unique name • Presence expression: indicates physical presence of the FRU • Hot Swap latch expression and LED signal

  12. Describing FRUs (2) • More clauses for “FRU” statement • FRU Information location (normally an EEPROM) • Signals for other standard and custom LEDs (besides Hot Swap) • Initial and periodic actions (local FRU management policies) • List of device descriptions for devices that belong to the FRU • List of IPMI sensor descriptions for sensors that belong to the FRU • Amount of power consumed by the FRU (used in power budget calculation and management) • Some other spec-defined FRU properties

  13. Describing Fan Trays • Fan tray is a specific case of FRU • Includes one or more fans that are used for shelf cooling • In HPDL, defined by “FAN TRAY” statement • Includes all clauses of the “FRU” statement, plus: • Fan speed properties: minimum, maximum and recommended speed level • A signal or set of signals to set fans to a certain speed level • A signal to cause emergency shutdown (in case of fire in the shelf) • List of fan speed (tachometer) sensors, associated with each fan

  14. Describing Devices • I/O devices on the Carrier board and in the shelf • Directly controlled by the Shelf Manager (without IPMI) • Mostly I2C devices, with some exceptions (direct ShMM GPIOs) • Each device is associated with some FRU • In HPDL, defined by “DEVICE” sub-statement • In the scope of the corresponding “FRU” statement • Includes the following clauses: • Device type • Device bus number and address • List of used signals

  15. Describing Signals • Set of signals represents the device interface • A signal can represent • An integer register • A single bit in a register • A data storage (e.g. an EEPROM) • Signal can be read-write, read-only or write-only • Internal signals a for device are defined by device type • HPDL maps internal signals to externally visible signals • Directly or using expressions • Defined by “SIGNALS” clause • In the scope of the corresponding “DEVICE” statement

  16. Handling Devices in the Shelf Manager • Some devices need an HPDL driver • A piece of code in the Shelf Manager software • Defines internal signals that can be exposed • Provides access to the actual device via the signals • Some I2C devices do not need a special driver • Use generic I2C driver in the Shelf Manager software • Exposes 256 byte-sized signals (mapped to registers) and 256*8 one-bit signals • Access via Read Byte/Write Byte SMB commands

  17. Describing Sensors • AdvancedTCA uses IPMI sensor model • Sensor properties described in Sensor Data Records (SDRs) • Analog sensors • Expose 1-byte raw value • Translated to actual value using formulas in SDR • Support thresholds and hysteresis • Discrete sensors • Up to 15 states, can be set simultaneously • Settable sensors: value/states can be set via IPMI commands • HPDL: mapping device signals to IPMI sensors • To make signals accessible via standard IPMI mechanisms

  18. Describing Sensors (2) • Described by “SENSORS” clause in a “FRU” statement • For each sensor, following attributes are specified • Sensor number and LUN (IPMI addressing information) • Sensor value as expression or expressions over signals • Initial state for discrete sensors • Polling interval in milliseconds • For settable sensors, signals to set when the value is set externally • SDRs are compiled separately and stored in a parallel data storage • SDR binary format defined by the IPMI specification • Compiled by already existing (reused) compiler • When implementing sensors, Shelf Manager software uses both HPDL and SDRs • SDRs provide sensor properties, HPDL provides binding to hardware

  19. FRU Carrier_FRU { SITE 3, 1; ... POWER_LEVELS { 10000; }; FRU_INFORMATION MasterADM1026.EEPROM; DEVICES { DEVICE Multiplexer { PCA9545: 0: 0x70; SIGNALS { Channels: Channels, "1", "2", "3", "4"; }; }; DEVICE MasterADM1026 { ADM1026: 0: 0x2e; SIGNALS { Temp1: IntTemp; Temp2: ExtTemp1; Temp3: ExtTemp2; St_3_3V: Stdby_3_3V; Main_3_3V: Main_3_3V; Plus_5V: Plus_5V; Minus_12V: Minus_12V; Vbat: Vbat; # Tachometer signals 0 to 7 Tachometer0: Tachometer0, "8"; ... Tachometer7: Tachometer7, "8"; # GPIOs: input, active low PwrGoodBus: GPIO12, in, low; PwrGoodAcb: GPIO13, in, low; FanControl: PWM; FanLocalControl: PWM_AFC; EEPROM: EEPROM; }; }; }; # End of DEVICES statement HPDL Example

  20. ... SENSORS { 0x10,0,2: 3000: MasterADM1026.Temp1; 0x10,0,3: 3000: MasterADM1026.St_3_3V; 0x10,0,6: 3000: MasterADM1026.Vbat; 0x10,0,15: 3000: MasterADM1026.PwrGoodBus; 0x10,0,16: 3000: MasterADM1026.PwrGoodAcb; # Expression used for the next sensor 0x10,0,17: 3000: !MasterADM1026.PwrGoodBus || MasterADM1026.PwrGoodAcb; }; # End of SENSORS statement }; # End of FRU statement HPDL Example (2)

  21. ASN.1 as Binary HPDL Format • ASN.1 BER (optionally compressed) as format for binary data • Produced by HPDL compiler, parsed by the Shelf Manager software • Motivations • Backward compatibility (new Shelf Manager interprets old HPDL modules) • Forward compatibility (old Shelf Manager interprets new HPDL modules) • Both can be achieved using ASN.1 tagged encoding • Compactness of representation (EEPROMs are small) • Decoding can be done efficiently (limited resources on ShMM) • Availability of libraries that encode and decode BER

  22. HPDL Compiler Implementation • Command-line program in two versions: for Windows and for Linux • Implemented in C++ • HPDL defined by a context-free grammar • Bison used as a parser generator • Can be compiled by GCC for Linux, by MSVC for Windows • Special tools to convert output to IPMI FRU Information format

  23. HPDL Introduction: Case Study: Client A • Shelf and Carrier Board vendor, collaborates with PPS for a long time • Carrier-specific code has been used to support their carriers and shelves • Initialization parameters were used to specify actual carrier and shelf model • Gradual transition to HPDL for this client • HPDL now used to support all new shelf models and new generation Carrier boards • Shelves became self-describing, no initialization parameters needed • Carrier-specific code still exists to support legacy hardware but is not actively maintained recently • HPDL modules are developed by PPS engineers, Client engineers have a working knowledge of them and sometimes make changes (in coordination with PPS) • Many change requests from the client affect HPDL modules only and do not require a new release of the Shelf Manager

  24. HPDL Introduction: Case Study: Client B • Another shelf and Carrier board vendor, recently came to AdvancedTCA market • HPDL was already used in PPS • No carrier-specific code for this client, only HPDL • HPDL modules developed by engineers on the client side • Made accessible to PPS to review and store in the common repository of HPDL modules • Client is self-sufficient with respect to support of their hardware with PPS management solutions

  25. Conclusion. Advantages of Using HPDL • No need of special Shelf Manager release to support new carrier boards/shelves • Dramatically reduced effort to implement support for new carrier boards/shelves in PPS • Carrier and shelf vendors can themselves use HPDL for their products and take support activity in their own hands

  26. Resources • Auriga Inc. • http://www.auriga.com • Pigeon Point Systems • http://www.pigeonpoint.com • PICMG • http://www.picmg.org • IPMI • http://www.intel.com/design/servers/ipmi

  27. Q&A; Auriga At a Glance World leader in R&D outsourcing Global Services 100 and Global Outsourcing 100 company Top 10 Offshore Eastern and Central Europe In business since 1990—first in Russia Incorporated in the U.S. in 1993 5 engineering centers in Russia—Moscow (3), Nizhny Novgorod (1), Rostov-on-Don (1) Engineering center in EU (Vilnius, Lithuania) Close relationship with the leading Chinese vendors 250+FTEs with low attrition & rotation CMMI Level4 company SPICE (ISO 15504) assessed Life critical software compliant Focus on software R&D and product engineering for high-tech clients Leader in system-level & embedded development services Proficient in Web & enterprise applications Mobile technologies & Knowledge management solutions as outposts of further expertise development

More Related