1 / 34

Jo ão Ferreira Bento (PT) Yvette Masson-Zanussi (EFAP)

EFAP SURVEY ON EUROPEAN ARCHITECTURAL POLICIES PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. Jo ão Ferreira Bento (PT) Yvette Masson-Zanussi (EFAP). Introduction Methodology Results Preliminary Conclusions. 1. Introduction. 1. Introduction.

zalika
Download Presentation

Jo ão Ferreira Bento (PT) Yvette Masson-Zanussi (EFAP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EFAP SURVEY ON EUROPEAN ARCHITECTURAL POLICIES PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS João Ferreira Bento (PT) Yvette Masson-Zanussi (EFAP)

  2. Introduction • Methodology • Results • Preliminary Conclusions

  3. 1. Introduction

  4. 1. Introduction In 2005, the EFAP undertook a European survey to review and assess the impact of the Resolution on Architectural Quality in the Urban and Rural Environments (2001/C 73/04).

  5. 1. Introduction In 2005, the EFAP undertook a European survey to review and assess the impact of the Resolution on Architectural Quality in the Urban and Rural Environments (2001/C 73/04).

  6. Moreover, the current survey also tries to assess the impact of the CouncilConclusions on Architecture: Culture's Contribution to Sustainable Development (2008/C 319/05) 1. Introduction 5 years after the previous survey and 10 years after the Council Resolution, the EFAP is repeating the survey in order to measure the progress of the implementation of the architectural policies in the European Union.

  7. 2. Methodology

  8. 2. Survey A questionnaire was circulated by email to governmental departments responsible for architectural policy within each Member State. To optimize the reliability of the information collected the questionnaire was only distributed to governmental departments.

  9. 2. Survey Scope: - 27 Members States (33 Administrations) - 4 Candidates countries - 2 Reference countries TOTAL: 37

  10. 2. Timeline • Dissemination: 28 December 2010 • First deadline: 31 January 2011 • Second deadline: 28 February 2011 • Presentation of results: 5 May 2011

  11. 3. Results

  12. 3.1 Does a specific department exist in charge of architectural policy?

  13. 3.2 Name of specific department in charge of architectural policy.

  14. 3.3 Ministry responsible for architecture policy.

  15. 3.3 Existence of any official publication outlining Government Policy on Architecture?

  16. 3.3 Existence of any official publication outlining Government Policy on Architecture? Yes (19) No (18)

  17. Types of official publications on architecture policy In a fast analysis it is possible to identify three main types of documents : a) Legislation (France); b) Policies (Belgium / Flanders; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; Ireland; Latvia; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Netherlands; UK / Scotland; UK / Northern Ireland; Sweden; Croatia; Iceland; Norway); c) Sectoral official documents (Cyprus, UK / England and UK / Wales)

  18. Type 1 - Legislation In the European panorama France was a pioneer country defining a national Law on architecture in 1977, Loi 77-2 sur l'architecture. • The Law was the basis for the creation of: • Mission Interministérielle pour la Qualité des Construtions Publiques (MIQCP); • Conseils d´Architecture, d´Urbanisme et de l´Environnement (CAUE).

  19. Type 2 – Policy documents • The policy documents are develop by the Government and generally approved / adopted by the Parliament and usually include: • aims and principles to improve architectural quality; • objectives and means in the different governmental areas; • actors involved in the implementation process; and in some cases, • a policy budget.

  20. Type 2 – Policy documents

  21. Type 2 – Policy documents In 1991, the Netherlands approved the first national government memorandum on architectural policy, entitled Space for Architecture. Covering 1991-1996, the policy paper focused on the role of the government as a contracting party and on improving the architectural climate.

  22. Type 2 – Policy documents • Since then, every 4/5 years, the Dutch Parliament approves a new version of the policy: • The Architecture of Space (1997-2000); • Shaping the Netherlands (2001-2004); • Architecture and Belvedere Policy (2005-2008); • A Culture of Design (2008-2011)

  23. Chronological development of national architectural policies

  24. Type 3 – Sectoral policy documents Some countries have enriched policy concerns in specific / sectoral policy documents. For example, England does not have an national architectural policy per se, but the publications of CABE and Better Public Buildings initiative fulfill the same remit.

  25. Types of official documents on architecture policy Type 1: 1 Type 2: 14 Type 3: 3 No: 18

  26. 4.6 If there is no official publication, is there any plan to develop one?

  27. 4.6 If there is no official publication, is there any plan to develop one? Type 1: 1 Type 2: 15 Type 3: 3 Progress: 12 No plan: 4 Unknown: 2

  28. 4. Preliminary Conclusions

  29. Legal and administrative families in Europe

  30. Official national documents on architecture policy Existent:19 Progress: 12 No plan:4 Unknown: 2

  31. 4. Preliminary Conclusions • A process of Europeanization is occurring, where through bench-marking each country learn form the other and make possible a more convergence between the policies; • The Council Resolution and Conclusions documents are having a positive impact at European level in encouraging the Member States to promote architectural quality;

  32. 4. Preliminary Conclusions • Some questions can be made about the real impact extent of the Council Resolution and Conclusions in the governmental programmes and procurement processes; • Some countries have mentioned the need for more evidence and research at European level that support the benefits and effectiveness of national architectural policies.

  33. EFAP SURVEY ON EUROPEAN ARCHITECTURAL POLICIES PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS João Ferreira Bento (PT) Yvette Masson-Zanussi (EFAP)

More Related