220 likes | 423 Views
Performance Data Management: Opportunities and Challenges. Lilit Tovmasian Mame Polito California Department of Aging Data Team November 2010. Workshop Objectives. Increased Importance of Data Data Management Review Future of Data CARS Users Group Discussion.
E N D
Performance Data Management: Opportunities and Challenges Lilit Tovmasian Mame Polito California Department of Aging Data Team November 2010
Workshop Objectives • Increased Importance of Data • Data Management Review • Future of Data • CARS Users Group Discussion
Increased Importance of Data Section 1
Increased Importance of Data Data Information Knowledge
Increased Importance of Data Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), 1993 • Requires federal agencies and programs to develop long-term Strategic Plans • Requires the publication of an Annual Performance Plans to accompany the budget justification • Requires federal agencies and programs to document results • Requires federal agencies and programs to improve performance based on results Accountability = Funding
Data Management Review Section 2
Data Management Review • What have we done? NAPIS SPR Trend
Data Management Review NAPIS SPR Service Summary Highlights – What Questions Does it Raise?
Data Management Review Whom Do We Serve? *Demographic information is available for only Title III registered clients.
Data Management Review • Family Caregiver Support Program (Title IIIE) Impact on Caregivers Caring for Elderly
Data Management Review • Information Challenges • Systems are more complex • Common data issues • Missing Data • Underreporting • Questionable Fluctuations • Not Meeting Reporting Requirements
Information Challenges • Common Data Issue #1 – Missing Data Missing data in FY 2009 NAPIS SPR • Solutions… • Add differentiation between “missing” and “declined to state” fields • Ensure intake sheets contain all required data elements • Implement evaluation surveys with a component of demographic data collection
Information Challenges • Common Data Issue #2 – Underreporting • Solutions… • Encourage direct data entry as much as possible • Investigate the reason behind under-reporting • Use available resources to resolve ongoing under-reporting
Information Challenges • Common Data Issue #3 – Questionable Fluctuations • Solutions… • Ongoing monitoring of data • Ongoing communication with providers, other AAA staff, CDA • Understand changes in service levels
Information Challenges • Common Data Issue # 4 – Not Meeting Reporting Requirements • Not collecting all data elements as required by the CARS File Specifications • Not reporting performance data where expenditures have been reported (vice versa) • Solutions… • Review the quarterly “CARS Quarterly Error Report” and make necessary system corrections • Review the CARS File Specifications • Reference the CARS Overview and Guidance document • Review with the AAA Fiscal Officer and Planner which services the AAA provides
Future of Data Management Section 3
Future of Data Management • Finalizing CARS Guidance • Common Concerns • Service Unit Rounding • Reporting “Primary” Caregivers
Future of Data Management • Establishing a Data Champion Users Group • 10 AAA Champion Users • A Diverse Group of AAAs • Changing Membership
Future of Data Management • AoA NAPIS SPR changes (July 1, 2011) • Updates to Service Categories and Data Dictionary • CARS modifications
CARS Users Group Discussion Section 4
CARS User Group Discussion • How can we continue to improve performance data collection and reporting across the Aging Services Network? &
Thank You for Your Participation Please remember complete the evaluation form.