150 likes | 319 Views
Pennsylvania’s Family Caregiver Support Program. Initiation of program as demonstration (1987) Passage of legislation Statewide implementation (1990) Addition of Federal Funding (2001) . PROGRAM HISTORY. Funding and Organization. Funded from state general fund & O.A.A.
E N D
Initiation of program as demonstration (1987) Passage of legislation Statewide implementation (1990) Addition of Federal Funding (2001) PROGRAM HISTORY
Funding and Organization • Funded from state general fund & O.A.A. • Current budget: $17.8 million/year • Administered at state level by PA Department of Aging (state unit on aging) • Administered locally by statewide network of 52 area agencies on aging
Program Eligibility • Care receiver must be 60+ years of age or have chronic dementia • Care receiver must have at least one ADL deficit
Core Program Benefits • Assessment and care management • Benefits counseling • Caregiver education and training (including caregiver support groups) • Core program benefits are available to all eligible participants as needed with no cost ceiling and no consumer cost sharing
Financial Reimbursement Benefits • Up to $500 per month for services and supplies (caseload average must not exceed $300/mo). • Up to $2,000 during the life of the case for home modifications and assistive devices • Relatives (including primary caregiver) may be reimbursed for expenses, but NOT paid for services rendered • Financial reimbursement benefits are subject to a sliding reimbursement scale
Sliding Reimbursement Scale • Families with incomes at or below 200% of poverty may receive full benefits (if needed) • Families with incomes between 200% and the eligibility ceiling of 380% of poverty receive declining reimbursements in 10% decrements as income increases in increments of 20% of poverty
Examples of Sliding Reimbursements • A family at income of 298% of poverty falls into the 50% reimbursement range. Maximum reimbursement is half of actual expenses, OR $250 per month for services and supplies and $1,000 for life of case for home modifications and/or assistive devices, whichever is less • A family with income of of 302% of poverty receives the lesser of 40% of actual expenses or $200/month and $800/case
Actual Utilization Patterns • Program serves about 4,500 families at any given time, and about 8000 unduplicated families per year • Program costs an average of about $3,000 per family for a full year of stay in the program • Average length of stay in the program is just above 8 months
Actual Utilization Patterns (Continued) • Most care receivers have multiple ADL deficits and some are nursing facility clinically eligible • Most caregivers are advanced in age and female, and some have IADL deficits • More than 80% of participating families have incomes below 200% of poverty and are therefore fully eligible for benefits
Program Strengths • Ideal for functional families and other strong, voluntary caregiving relationships • Allows the family autonomy to structure the caregiving environment with public $$$ merely supporting and filling gaps • Costs run about 10% of nursing home care, about 20% of our Medicaid waiver, and about 1/2 of the cost of standard aging in-home services for consumers with similar needs
ProgramLimitations • Low benefit ceilings unsuited to families unwilling or unable to provide the bulk of care informally • “Niche” program which can be an important part of the HCBS continuum, but not the entire answer
Program Impacts • Allows more efficient use of public resources for a sub-set of the service population, leaving more for consumers in less supportive living environments • Minimizes public interference into the affairs of functional families, while meeting consumer needs • Serves as a laboratory for consumerism which has been gradually incorporated into traditional aging home and community based services
Interface Issues • Many consumers have formal service needs that go beyond the FCSP benefit ceilings, yet live with very supportive caregivers • The availability of primary in-home care providers using traditional models is diminishing • Medicaid waiver standards tend toward traditional models which can restrict who provides care and when it is provided
The 21st Century Challenge • Demographic trends predict the financial necessity for maximizing the use of informal supports in community based long term care • Flexibility in program design which respects family autonomy will be crucial • Pennsylvania’s Family Caregiver Support Program is demonstrating concepts that may contribute to the design of the larger system