1 / 42

Core Team: John Adams ConocoPhillips Alan Doniger POSC Kristine Gibbons Shell

Global Unique Well Identifier (GUWI) Initiative GUWI Steering Team Meeting 30 October 2006 POSC Special Interest Group Meeting 7 November 2006. Core Team: John Adams ConocoPhillips Alan Doniger POSC Kristine Gibbons Shell Mark Stehm ExxonMobil. Agenda. 1. Welcome and Introductions

zanthe
Download Presentation

Core Team: John Adams ConocoPhillips Alan Doniger POSC Kristine Gibbons Shell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global Unique Well Identifier (GUWI) InitiativeGUWI Steering Team Meeting30 October 2006POSC Special Interest Group Meeting7 November 2006 Core Team: John Adams ConocoPhillips Alan Doniger POSC Kristine Gibbons Shell Mark Stehm ExxonMobil POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  2. Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Review Meeting Objectives 3. Update on progress 4. Well Identity Service Agreement (POSC-IHS) 5. Well Identity Service Work Group 6. Review and Agree on Next Steps 7. Questions and Open Discussion POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  3. A2D Rob Gibson BP Savannah Arnold ChevronYaw Adu ConocoPhillips John Adams DeloitteGraham Sadler ExxonMobilMark Stehm Fugro-Robertson Simon Kendall IHS Energy Nick Duncan Steve Cooper Marathon Damon Simmons NexenPat Ryan POSCAlan Doniger Shell Kris Gibbons TobinMartin Schardt MMSChris Gaudry Wood MackenzieCharles Mitchell Continuing Steering Team POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  4. Oct. 30 Team Call: Meeting Objectives • Communicate progress on the GUWI initiative • Formally launch the Well Identity Service Work Group (WIS WG) • Call for participation and sponsorship of WIS WG • Identify issues and concerns to be addressed POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  5. Steering Team Meeting DecisionsOperator Sub Group 8 May 2006 • The GUWI steering group endorse the Unique Well Identifier established by IHS Energy as the Global Unique Well Identifier for the E&P industry (for wells outside USA and Canada) • That the proposed RFP process be suspended and that negotiations progress with IHS regarding operation of the GUWI service • That POSC (on behalf of the GUWI Steering Team) sign a Letter of Intent with IHS documenting the key aspects of the GUWI service and the intent to establish a contractual agreement for IHS to operate the service POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  6. IHS – POSC Letter of Intent15 August 2006 POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  7. Key Agreements • Documents the intention of IHS to contribute the IHS “international” identifier to the Public Domain • Recognizes IHS as provider of the GUWI service for an initial period of three years • Recognizes POSC as the body responsible for managing the public well data on behalf of the E&P industry • Recognises the role of a Well Identity Services Work Group to oversee the service • States that future well data will be released as public unless the registering organisation specifies otherwise • Commits the parties to work with the Steering Team to establish detailed terms and conditions POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  8. Current IHS ServicePOSC SIG June 2006 Master Well Index • We will initially populate the MWI with all of the IHS Energy wells in the Canadian, US, and International databases; these will be flagged as proprietary. • Over time, we will add to this data on new and unique wells provided to us by customers; these will be flagged as public. • New and unique wells added through IHS Energy research and accumulation processes will continue to be flagged as proprietary. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  9. Current IHS ServicePOSC SIG June 2006 For our customers: • We will deliver the full MWI for the regions that they subscribe to. • We will deliver records flagged as public for the areas that they don’t subscribe to. • The proprietary content of the MWI will remain the property of IHS Energy covered by existing data contracts. For non-customers: • We will make the records flagged as public available POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  10. Current IHS Service POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  11. Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Review Meeting Objectives 3. Update on progress 4. Well Identity Service Agreement (POSC-IHS) 5. Well Identity Service Work Group 6. Review and Agree on Next Steps 7. Questions and Open Discussion POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  12. Well Identity Service Agreement • The Well Identity Service will be provided by IHS under contractual agreement with POSC (on behalf of the E&P industry) • The agreement will include the definition of services, service levels, terms and fees • Registration of new wells and issue of GUWI • Matching of existing well and assignment of GUWI • Provision of public well data set • ... Details of services and service levels to be defined by the WIS Work Group POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  13. Well Identity Service Roles POSC Data Mgt. SIG Alignment with other E&P standards WIS Work Group Service definition, Industry alignment, Adoption, Funding POSC Organization Contract Holder Public data custodian IHS Service Provider QueryRequest RegistrationRequest POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  14. WIS Work Group • Role • Advocate, define requirements, initially review, and promote industry standards that support the GUWI initiative • Advise POSC on services to contract to support the GUWI initiative • Membership • Open to all organisations • Sponsoring member • Provide funding through membership fees (based on company revenue) • Voting rights on budget and major service changes • Participating member • Participation in Work Group meetings • Contribute resources and expertise to activities POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  15. SIG and Initial Work Group Fees * POSC members who have the “SIG Package” pay no additional Data Mgt SIG fee. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  16. WIS Work Group Agreements • Work Group membership agreement with POSC is required • Both POSC members and non-POSC members can join • Sponsoring members must be participants in the Data Mgt. SIG Full documentation at: http://www.posc.org/sig/dss/oct06_wiswg.html POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  17. Business Case Template for Support of Global Unique Well Identifier Use by Operators Work-in-ProgressbyMark Stehm, ExxonMobilKris Gibbons, Shell

  18. Sample Template  Business Case • Some companies, maybe all, will want a business case documented for the use of the industry standard GUWIs in their database(s) and business transactions • The purpose of this template is to help get started on that business case document • You can use as much or as little of it as you need • The final document will be available at www.posc.org POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  19. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  20. Introduction • POSC ~ IHS ~ GUWI ~ Services • Purpose of “Identifier” • Single source for a unique code that can be used by all operators, service companies and data providers to tag information for delivery to a customer. • This will facilitate matching data from multiple sources • This will reduce the likelihood of errors  improved performance and data quality POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  21. Table of Contents • Background • Process • Investment • Risks • Benefits • Appendix: Data Elements POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  22. Background • Problem • ~ 4 million oil and gas wells, world-wide. • Status: from very old P&A through active producers / injectors to currently drilling wells. • Regulatory agencies assign well id/names. • Id/names change due to • Sales • Unitization • Life cycle changes • Etc. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  23. Background • Problem (continued) • Difficult to merge well data • Difficult to merge or compare data from multiple sources • DM staff and geoscientists & engineers must perform matching process to make use of data • Matching can occur multiple times over the life of a well • The challenge of matching may prevent the most current data from being loaded and made available • Manual matching wastes time and money POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  24. Background • Solution • Single identifier • Assigned in a consistent manner • By one service • For every well in existence • Condition of Success • Use of the GUWI must become wide-spread to achieve automated matching of well data from multiple sources. • Result • More efficient and consistent transfers within the operator’s organization, with partners, with service companies, with regulators. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  25. Process • Current Wells • Operator is responsible for the well data • Knows the quality of the data • Operator provides mandatory data element values to the Registration Service • Registration Service assigns GUWI and provides GUWI to Operator. Data stored in Public Well Index file, available to industry • TIGHT WELL PROVISION. Operator may declare well as ‘tight’ up to a designated date. • NON-PUBLIC PROVISION. Operator need not declare well data “public.” Any data element values given to Service Provided kept as proprietary. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  26. Process • Legacy Data • For older wells, any industry company may send data element values to Matching Service. • Match OK. Existing GUWI returned. • Match Not-OK. Operator may use Registration Service … • If Operator sends data for matching, data element values may be added to Public Well Index. • NON PUBLIC PROVISION. Operator need not declare well data “public.” Any data element values given to Service Provided kept as proprietary. • TRANSPARENCY. Matching Service Provider will not retain data element values used only for matching purposes. POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  27. Investment • Cash Costs • Retail use of Services • No fees if within usage limits (to be defined) • May be fees if bundled with value-added competitive services, e.g. subscription services • Payments to Service Provider to offset cost of delivering industry Standards-related Services • Managing Public Well Index • Registration Service • Matching Service • Funding • From WIS Work Group Sponsor Members • Separate from POSC dues and SIG fees POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  28. Investment • Manpower • Cost of initial implementation • Software to retrieve Operator data to be sent to Service Provider for Registration &/or Matching • Initial format is a spreadsheet • Task time: few days including exception handling • Ongoing cost to interact with Service Provider • Summary • Few days programming and data management (once) • Monitoring on an ongoing basis POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  29. Risks • Release of Information • Must avoid pre-mature release of information. • Options: • Do not register • Do not provide data element values to Service Provider (as Public Data or otherwise) • Declare well to be ‘TIGHT’ for a period of time • Government Data Release Rules • Restricted countries • Automatic release after “x” time countries POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  30. Benefits • Overview • Operators use data from many sources for prospecting and surveillance. • Manual involvement in matching data is time consuming and costly, regardless of which type of employee does the work • Time delays in matching processes can have negative impact of performance POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  31. Benefits • Actual Savings • Example. • Consider 200 project data stores containing 100,000 wells. • One data vendor provides updates weekly. • 5% matches need manual reconciliation • 5 minutes each • Intervention cost = 400+ man-hours per week or 10+ full-time employees. • Example. • [Look for other examples that impact positive results rather than cost savings.] POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  32. Appendix: Data Elements • WELLBORE ATTRIBUTES • Mandatory • ID • Name • Parent Id (if not “root” wellbore) • Local or regulatory ID/Names • Country • Surface and bottom-hole LAT/LONG (WGS84, original) POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  33. Appendix: Data Elements • Optional • Status • Content • Spud Date/Kick-off Date • TD • Indicator: Onshore/Offshore • Offshore Block • Field POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  34. Appendix: Data Elements • Registration Data • Company • Contact (Name, Address, etc.) • Access Restrictions • Made Public (…) • Made Tight (…) • Date Registered • Status (active, superseded by …) • Modification (by, date) POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  35. Final business case document will be posted on POSC website: www.posc.org Comments or questions, contact: Mark Stehm 281-654-4157 mark.r.stehm@exxonmobil.com Kris Gibbons Kristine.Gibbons@shell.com POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  36. Next Steps • Core team to engage prospective members • Formal establishment of the Work Group • Continue drafting of WIS service agreement, especially: • POSC-IHS agree WIS service agreement • Continue routine WIS WG / Service Provider Conference Calls POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  37. Next Steps • Core team to engage prospective members • POSC to promote activity (website + Data Mgt. SIG Nov 7) • Template business case to be available in by middle of November POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  38. Next Steps • Formal establishment of the Work Group • Requires agreements from at least four sponsoring members • Election of WIS Work Group Chair for 2007 POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  39. Next Steps • Continue drafting of WIS service agreement, especially: • Detailed service definitions, including data elements • Service performance criteria • Service reimbursement policies and procedures POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  40. Next Steps • POSC-IHS agree on the WIS service agreement for the primary service provider • Target: year-end • Can be followed by agreements with secondary service providers • Act as agents for their own customers with IHS POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  41. Next Steps • Continue routine WIS WG / Service Provider Conference Calls • October 30 • November 15 POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

  42. Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Review Meeting Objectives 3. Update on progress 4. Well Identity Service Agreement (POSC-IHS) 5. Well Identity Service Work Group 6. Review and Agree on Next Steps 7. Questions and Open Discussion POSC Data Management SIG / WIS Work Group

More Related