1 / 12

Development of a refined conceptual model for aquatic food webs in San Francisco Bay

Development of a refined conceptual model for aquatic food webs in San Francisco Bay. RMP 2007 Proposed Special Study. Overarching questions. How is the SF Bay food web organized? What is the relative role of sediments vs. the water column as transport pathways of contaminants to biota?

zarek
Download Presentation

Development of a refined conceptual model for aquatic food webs in San Francisco Bay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of a refined conceptual model for aquatic food webs in San Francisco Bay RMP 2007 Proposed Special Study

  2. Overarching questions • How is the SF Bay food web organized? • What is the relative role of sediments vs. the water column as transport pathways of contaminants to biota? • Is there food-web driven spatial variation in contaminant uptake?

  3. Source: Bridges et al. 2006

  4. Source: Bridges et al. 2006

  5. Hypotheses:

  6. Approach • Review literature and local data ($5,000) • Field sample collection ($2,000) • Gut content analysis of fishes ($10,000) • Communication of results ($3,000)

  7. Review literature and local information • Focus on updating or refining conceptual model for key species • Is the model accurate? Is it likely to vary spatially? • Harbor seals, least terns, surfperch, croaker, small fish • Multiple data sources • Previous unpublished studies on surfperch, croaker (Port of Oakland, Regional Board/MLML, DFG historic studies) • Harbor seals publications – Dianne Kopec, Emma Grigg • Least tern diets – Meredith Elliot, USFWS, SFBNWR, Calfed Project • IEP and IRWMP silverside diets • Literature review

  8. Field sample collection • Collection will have to be opportunistic due to budgetary limitations • Leveraged from other projects • RMP Fish 2006 - Shiner perch and croaker • EEPS small fish Hg 2006 and 2007 – topsmelt and silverside • EEPS endocrine effects to small fish 2007 (Kevin Kelley) – surfperch • IEP trawl surveys • USFWS Beach seine surveys • Picking up fish and fixing stomachs

  9. Laboratory gut content analysis • Target fish species • Focus on sufficient information to determine proportion benthic vs. pelagic prey • ID to order or family level • Some estimates of relative mass or volume • Trade off between number of fish vs. detail level of information • If field sampling is sufficient, will examine spatial variation in prey types • Details to be worked out with subcontractor

  10. Communication of results • Focus on interaction and communication with RB and other interested stakeholders • Summary presentation of findings and discussion of future research directions • Short (approximately 5 pp.) technical memo

  11. Possible next steps in future years • Refine estimates of sediment vs. surface water in contaminant uptake • Incorporate refined dietary estimates into food web model • Combine food web and fate models • Role of sediments vs. water column • Spatial variation in sources

More Related