410 likes | 563 Views
A Study of Optimal Membrane Triangles with Drilling Freedoms. Carlos A. Felippa. Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences and Center for Aerospace Structures University of Colorado at Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0429, USA. Presentation to FEM Minisymposium USNCCM7, Albuquerque, July 2003.
E N D
A Study of Optimal Membrane Triangles with Drilling Freedoms Carlos A. Felippa Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences and Center for Aerospace StructuresUniversity of Colorado at Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0429, USA Presentation to FEM Minisymposium USNCCM7, Albuquerque, July 2003
Here is a Well Known Distortion Benchmark • UBOTP (UniDirectional Bending-Optimal Trapezoidal Panel) • Passes the patch test on any mesh • Retains a bounded condition number, even for a triangle!
Outline • Why drilling freedoms • Element development • Finding the best • Templates • Conclusions
Presentation Source • Technical details in expository paper: • C. A. Felippa, A study of optimal membrane triangles with drilling freedoms, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 192, 2125-2168, 2003 • Reprints available here
High Performance Elements - Definition Simple elements that deliver results of engineering accuracy with arbitrary coarse meshes
(Personal) Preferences for HP Elements (1) - only corner nodes - only physical freedoms - passes patch test on any plane mesh - no condensation: EAS, incompatible modes etc, are waste of time
(Personal) Preferences for HP Elements (2) - do not assume you can refine the mesh in real engineering systems - robust when used by inexperienced modelers - can be customized to do multiple duties - can be optimized for specific criteria - develop by symbolic computation
Membrane Elements with Drilling DOFs Interesting as HPFEM because - Performance improved without adding side DOFs - Rotational DOF “free of charge” - Simplifies shell modeling: intersections, stiffeners, ..
F-16 Aeroelastic Structural Model Finest model: 250000 Nodes, 1.5 M DOF
F-16 Internal Structure Zoom Over 95% ofelements are18-DOF triangleshell elements,including stiffeners
A Brief History of Drilling DOFs Late 1960s: rectangles developed @ Berkeley (by Scordelis’ students) 1979: quadrilateral shell element @ Lockheed for STAGS 1970-1984: many efforts to construct satisfactory triangles fail 1984: Allman triangle, works but rank deficient 1985: Bergan-Felippa FF triangle, rank sufficient but complicated 1988: Allman’s rank-sufficient triangle 1992: Felippa-Militello ANDES triangle, bending optimal Since 1992: many more models 2002: placed in template framework
HO Stiffness by ANDES: (3) Pick Hierarchical Strain Modes Filter torsion mode:
Fortran Version Freely available: contact author by e-mail ~350000 elements/sec on a 3GHz P4 (DP float) Eventual goal: 1 million elements/sec Membrane takes about 35% of formation time of 18 DOF linear shell element, 25% of corotational shell
Constructing HP Elements - 3 Approaches Fig from CMAME 192, 2125-2168, 2003 Templates
The Template Approach • Element equations (stiffness, mass, etc) are directlyconstructed as parametrized algebraic forms • The construction is done in two stages: basic andhigher order components • Constraints (e.g., orthogonality) are enforced between the components to insure a priori satisfaction of the patch test without need of a posteriori checks
Template “Genetics” • The set of free parameters is the template signature • The number of free parameters can be reduced by applying behavioral constraints to produce element families • Specific elements instances are obtained by assigning numerical values to the free parameters of a family • Elements with the same signature, possibly derived through different methods, are called clones
Advantages of Template Approach • One form generates an infinite # of instances • Instances are not necessarily obtainable byconventional (variational based) formulations • Unified implementation (input: signature) weeds out clones, simplifies benchmarking • Can be customized, or optimized, for specific configurations or needs
Technical Difficulties • Limited theory available • Symbolic manipulations beyond human endurance. Only possible via computer algebra systems.Memory and CPU power limitations have so far restricted template development to • 1D: 2-node beams • 2D: 3-node triangles (membrane + plate bendingcombined for shell elements with drilling freedoms)
Web Resources • If interested in FE templates, see material posted at • http://caswww.colorado.edu/Felippa.d/Home.html -> Papers and Reports