50 likes | 184 Views
Country-led impact evaluation: A survey of development practitioners. Denis Jobin Vice-President IDEAS. Presentation outline. Relation between Good governance and CLE (CLIE: country-led impact evaluation) CLIE and Quality Survey results of development evaluators practitioners.
E N D
Country-led impact evaluation: A survey of development practitioners Denis Jobin Vice-President IDEAS
Presentation outline • Relation between Good governance and CLE (CLIE: country-led impact evaluation) • CLIE and Quality • Survey results of development evaluators practitioners
Why Country-led Evaluation? Relation between Country-led evaluation and good governance: transaction costs • Relationship with 3 out of 6 characteristics of good governance (WB) • Voice and accountability • Government effectiveness • Control of corruption
Why Country-led Evaluation? • CLIE and Quality • No agreed upon definition of Evaluation quality • Should be method free or method driven? • Farrington, D • Statistical Conclusion Validity • Internal Validity • Construct Validity • External Validity • Jobin, D. • the joint ability that an evaluator will1- assess and 2- report on the performance of an institutional arrangement by the product of its competence (ability to assess) and the product of its independence (ability of revealing)
Why Country-led Evaluation? • Survey results: • Dominant approach: The Logical Framework Approach • Dominant method: case study • Counterfactuals important? • 41% believe not important (32% are important) • Conclusion: Many challenges remains, Capacity, agreed upon definitions standards, quality.