1 / 19

Dynamics of Drop Impact on Solid, Dry Surfaces

Dynamics of Drop Impact on Solid, Dry Surfaces. Ashley Macner a a Departments of Chemical Engineering and Physics, Clarkson University Mentor: Dr. John McLaughlin. Overview. Motivation. Static Experiments. Vs. SSD Theory. Dynamic Experiments. Vs. LBM Theory. Future Work.

zarola
Download Presentation

Dynamics of Drop Impact on Solid, Dry Surfaces

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dynamics of Drop Impact on Solid, Dry Surfaces Ashley Macner a a Departments of Chemical Engineering and Physics, Clarkson University Mentor: Dr. John McLaughlin

  2. Overview Motivation Static Experiments Vs. SSD Theory Dynamic Experiments Vs. LBM Theory Future Work LBM = Lattice Boltzmann Method SSD = Shape of a Sessile Drop

  3. Motivation To test the robustness and precision of a version of the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) developed by Inamuro et al.1 in simulating the time evolution of the impact of a liquid distilled water drop onto a solid, dry surface such as wax paper. Think solid ink-jet printing (SIJ)2.

  4. SSD Theory (1) From differential geometry: where R1 = the radius of curvature in the r-z plane of figure 1 R2 = the radius of curvature in the perpendicular plane p* = the pressure jump across the curved surface at z=0 g = gravity ρ = liquid density γ = surface tension Figure 1-Schematic drawing of sessile drop showing coordinate system

  5. Introduce Scaling Parameters: (9) (10a) (10b) Scaled Boundary Conditions: (11) (12)

  6. PossibleDetours 1) Evaporation? 2) Reproducibility of Drops? m3

  7. Static Experiment Camera Ring Stand Syringe Diode 3 Prong Clamp

  8. Still Images L H*

  9. m3

  10. Results For wax paper: Simulation:

  11. LBM Theory • Particle distribution functions • Q15D3 lattice • Lattice includes a rest state • Tolerates large density ratios

  12. 2-D

  13. t = 1.28 ms t = 0.47 ms t = 1.98 ms t = 3.14 ms

  14. Dynamic Experiments

  15. Future Work • 3-D Lattice Boltzmann simulation • Lower viscosity • Use LBM to simulate what is going on inside the drop • Develop a mathematical model

  16. References [1] Inamuro, T., Ogata, T., Tajima, S., and Konishi, N. (2004).A lattice Boltzmann method for incompressible two-phase flows with large density differences. Journal of Computational Physics. 198. pp 628-644. [2] Andrews, J., Ashgriz, N., Chandra, S., and Li, R. Drawback Effect of Multi-droplet Deposition in Solid Ink Printing. pp 1-23. [3] O’Brien, S. and van den Brule, B. (1991). Shape of a Small Sessile Drop and the Determination of Contact Angle. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 87. pp 1579-1583. [4] Marengo, M., Rioboo, R., and Tropea, C. (2002).Time evolution of liquid drop impact onto solid, dry surfaces. Experiments in Fluids. 33. pp 112-124. [5] Jia, X., Kontomaris, K., and McLaughlin, J. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of flows with fluid-fluid interfaces. Asia Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering. pp 1-39.

  17. Acknowledgments • Dr. John McLaughlin • Dr. Xinli Jia • Family • All of you!

  18. Thank you for your time…Questions? Any further questions can be diverted to my email: macneram@clarkson.edu

More Related