1 / 30

MARCH 16-17, 2011 NEW YORK CITY, NY EVALUATION RESULTS Michelle Bissonnette

MARCH 16-17, 2011 NEW YORK CITY, NY EVALUATION RESULTS Michelle Bissonnette U.S. Department of Education. Table of Contents Who Responded ? Results Overall Summit Evaluation Evaluation of Sessions Evaluation of Logistics and Support Evaluation Comments. Who Responded? .

zavad
Download Presentation

MARCH 16-17, 2011 NEW YORK CITY, NY EVALUATION RESULTS Michelle Bissonnette

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MARCH 16-17, 2011 NEW YORK CITY, NY EVALUATION RESULTS Michelle Bissonnette U.S. Department of Education

  2. Table of Contents Who Responded ? Results Overall Summit Evaluation Evaluation of Sessions Evaluation of Logistics and Support Evaluation Comments

  3. Who Responded?

  4. Who Responded? Chart: See accessible version in notes 19% 43% Participants: Attendees engaged in dialogue at the center table Attendees: Invited guests in audience observing dialogue and participating in Q&A Response Rate: Percent of each group who completed an evaluation

  5. Overall Summit Evaluation

  6. Item 3A. The summit as a whole was useful – I am glad I attended. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.74 Attendees: 4.48 All: 4.61

  7. Item 3B. The issues discussed were relevant to my work. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.58 Attendees: 4.44 All: 4.51

  8. Item 3C. I learned about policies and practices that will help me when I return home. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes • Average Score • Participants: 4.31 • Attendees: 4.08 • All: 4.19

  9. Item 3D. I made valuable professional connections. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.03 Attendees: 3.98 All: 4.00

  10. Item 3E. The OECD background paper was informative and will serve as useful tool as I continue this work. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.31 Attendees: 4.33 All: 4.32

  11. Item 3F. The meeting logistics and pre-meeting communications were effective. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.12 Attendees: 4.03 All: 4.07

  12. Evaluation of Sessions

  13. Item 4A. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Framing the Issues session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.58 Attendees: 4.36 All: 4.47

  14. Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Recruitment and Preparation session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.43 Attendees: 4.11 All: 4.27

  15. Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Development, Support and Retention session (5 = Excellent , 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.41 Attendees: 4.13 All: 4.27

  16. Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Evaluation and Compensation session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.41 Attendees: 4.07 All: 4.24

  17. Item 4B. Quality, Relevance and Usefulness of Teacher Engagement in Reform session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.12 Attendees: 4.19 All: 4.15

  18. Item 4C. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the format of the sessions. Item 4C. Session Format Part I – Participant Discussion (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Item 4C. Session Format Part II – Attendee Q&A Chart: See accessible version in notes Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.59 Attendees: 4.32 All: 4.45 Average Score Participant: 4.15 Attendee: 3.97 All: 4.06

  19. Item 4D. Quality, relevance and usefulness of What Have We Learned? session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.22 Attendees: 4.42 All: 4.32

  20. Evaluation of Logistics & Support

  21. Item 5A. Travel and hotel information was clear and timely. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.45 Attendees: 4.05 All: 4.25

  22. Item 5B. American Museum of Natural History was an effective setting for day one. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.25 Attendees: 3.98 All: 4.11

  23. Item 5B. The Hilton NY was an effective setting for day two. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes • Average Score • Participants: 4.60 • Attendees: 4.44 • All: 4.52

  24. Item 5B. My questions and concerns were addressed in a timely and complete manner. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) Chart: See accessible version in notes Average Score Participants: 4.50 Attendees: 4.21 All: 4.35

  25. Evaluation Comments

  26. Comments on Format: • Tony Mackay – brilliant moderator • Rich + very good • Great to have unions and ministers together • Keep questions/comments from observers/audience focused on session topic. • Submit questions from audience in advance. • Include more time for Q&A or vary format of sessions throughout day.

  27. Comments on Format: • More time for discussion and networking • Sessions began to feel a bit redundant • Greater variety of session format: breakouts, mixed seating during meals • Include more teachers at the table. • Extend the summit so there is more time to process and engage. • Video screens and interpreters a must • School leaders/principal representatives – what is our role in the summit?

  28. Participants/Attendees found helpful or insightful: • Framing document/session • Rapporteurs’ summaries • Learning from international experiences esp. Hong Kong, Singapore and Finland • Hearing how unions and management work in collaboration • High achieving countries’ clearly defined systemic change • Hearing about: • the common challenges of all education systems • similar problems from which we can learn and translate solutions for our own unique contexts

  29. General Feedback: • THANK YOU! BRAVO! EXCELLENT! STUNNING! • Please continue this summit in future. • Suggested readings/research for attendees • Materials/logistical information available earlier • A teacher exchange could add a lot to understanding between the countries. • This was an outstanding and historic event that began a very important conversation with the objective to improve teaching and learning.

  30. THANK YOU!

More Related