1 / 34

Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009

Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009. Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Clear Creek Solutions’ Hydrology Expertise.

zeheb
Download Presentation

Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009Anaheim, CAAugust 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

  2. Clear Creek Solutions’ Hydrology Expertise Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., provides complete range of hydrologic and stormwater modeling services. • Clear Creek specializes in continuous simulation hydrologic modeling. • We have 30+ years of experience modeling complex hydrologic and stormwater problems. • We created WWHM3 for Washington State Department of Ecology and are adapting it to model San Francisco Bay Area and San Diego watersheds and facilities. • We teach WWHM and HSPF workshops.

  3. Presentation Introduction Historical Hydrology Modern Hydrology LID Design Summary Questions & Answers

  4. Historical Hydrology Slide rule hydrology: Rational Method (Q = CIA) SCS methods: TR-55, TR-20, SBUH, HEC-1, etc. Based on modeling a single-event (2-year storm, etc.)

  5. Historical Hydrology Traditionally we have used single-event design storms to size stormwater and LID facilities based on frequency. Design storm assumption: 2-year rainfall causes 2-year flood.

  6. Single-event design storm methodology doesn’t work for stormwater and LID design because: • Single-event flow frequency standards are based on inappropriate assumptions. • Single-event modeling cannot represent the evapotranspiration and infiltration occurring between storm events.

  7. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • A specific frequency runoff (e.g. 2-yr) will be caused by the same frequency rainfall event. FACT: The frequency of the runoff event depends on existing soil moisture conditions and the current amount of water in storage in the LID facility.

  8. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • A specific frequency runoff (e.g. 2-yr) will be caused by the same frequency rainfall event. Seattle 2-Year Runoff (LP3)

  9. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • A hypothetical storm shape (e.g. Type 1A) is representative of actual historic rainfall events. FACT: Actual rainfall events come in many shapes and it is the intensity of the rainfall that is a major factor in how much runoff occurs.

  10. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • A hypothetical storm shape (e.g. Type 1A) is representative of actual historic rainfall events.

  11. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • Storm events always start with an average antecedent soil moisture condition. FACT: Actual rainfall events may occur back-to-back or after a long drought and have totally different antecedent soil moisture conditions.

  12. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • LID facilities are empty at the start of a storm event. FACT: LID facilities may be partially or completely full of water at the start of a storm event.

  13. Single-event inappropriate assumptions: • LID facilities are empty at the start of a storm event. Storm Events Full Empty

  14. Single-event modeling cannot represent the evapotranspiration and infiltration occurring between storm events. • The effectiveness of LID facilities depends on what happens between storm events.

  15. Single-event modeling cannot represent the evapotranspiration and infiltration occurring between storm events. Precip > ET ET > Precip

  16. Single-event modeling cannot represent the evapotranspiration and infiltration occurring between storm events. ET > Precip Precip > ET

  17. Single-event modeling cannot represent the evapotranspiration and infiltration occurring between storm events. Green Roof Runoff vs Conventional Roof Runoff Runoff small decrease Large decrease

  18. NOTE: Most LID designs based on “Runoff Credits” are really based on these flawed single-event assumptions. They only hide the problems, they don’t fix them and should not be used.

  19. Modern Hydrology Continuous simulation hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model (1966) HSPF (1980) WWHM (2001) Pseudo-continuous simulation: SWMM HEC-HMS

  20. Modern Hydrology • Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. Stormwater runoff = surface runoff + interflow.

  21. Modern Hydrology • Continuous simulation hydrology explicitly represents hydrologic processes such as interception storage, soil moisture fluctuations, evaporation, transpiration, and the effects of long-term infiltration rather than having to make the assumptions used in single-event hydrology.

  22. Modern Hydrology • Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. • Use long-term historic rainfall data to generate long-term simulated runoff, stage, and actual ET data. • For example: 50 years of NWS hourly rainfall data generates approximately 400,000 hours of runoff data. • Statistically analyze the data to compute flow and stage frequencies, durations, and evaluate the effectiveness of LID designs for a wide range of hydrologic conditions.

  23. Modern Hydrology Flow Frequency (Log Pearson Type III)

  24. Modern Hydrology Flow Duration (% Time Exceeded)

  25. LID Design There is nothing magical about LIDs. Water must go somewhere. Water must either: Infiltrate into the soil. Evaporate/transpire into the atmosphere. Runoff. The majority of the infiltration and ET occurs between storm events, NOT during them.

  26. LID Design Infiltration + ET The majority of the infiltration and ET occurs between storm events, NOT during them.

  27. LID Design • Types of LID facilities used for stormwater mitigation: • Green/vegetated/eco-roofs • Rain gardens/bioretention • Permeable pavements • Impervious surface dispersion Note: All (except for green roofs) can include infiltration.

  28. Green Roof Green/vegetated/eco-roof: Relies on ET.

  29. Rain Garden/Bioretention Rain garden/bioretention/landscape swale Relies on both ET and infiltration.

  30. Porous Pavement Relies on ET and infiltration.

  31. Impervious Runoff Dispersion Dispersion of impervious roof or parking lot runoff on adjacent pervious lawn; relies on ET and infiltration.

  32. Summary • What happens between storm events is just as important as what happens during storm events. • Infiltration and evapotranspiration are what makes LID facilities effective in reducing stormwater.

  33. Summary • Historical hydrology makes inappropriate assumptions. • Modern continuous simulation hydrology simulates LID effectiveness over a wide range of hydrologic conditions and is more accurate than the historic single-event methods.

  34. For more informationContact: Doug Beyerlein 425.225.5997beyerlein@clearcreeksolutions.comJoe Brascher 360.943.0304brascher@clearcreeksolutions.com Or go to: www.clearcreeksolutions.com

More Related