1 / 15

“Cash on Delivery” to Improve MCH: Is it Feasible

“Cash on Delivery” to Improve MCH: Is it Feasible. Mead Over Center for Global Development Pay-for-Performance and Performance-Based Aid: at the Crossroads? International Workshop organized by the "Incentives for Health Provider Performance Network" UNIVERSITY OF AUVERGNE- CERDI

zena
Download Presentation

“Cash on Delivery” to Improve MCH: Is it Feasible

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Cash on Delivery” to Improve MCH: Is it Feasible Mead OverCenter for Global Development Pay-for-Performance and Performance-Based Aid: at the Crossroads? International Workshop organized by the "Incentives for Health Provider Performance Network" UNIVERSITY OF AUVERGNE- CERDI CLERMONT-FERRAND – FRANCE May 11, 2011

  2. Cash on delivery defined

  3. Key Features of COD Aid • Rewards improvements in outcomes • Hands-off • Independent verification • Transparency • Complementarity with other aid programs Source: Birdsall&Savedoff (2010) http://www.cgdev.org/section/initiatives/_active/codaid

  4. Basic steps of COD Aid • Two parties (donor and recipient) negotiate a 2 to 4 year contract specifying that donor will pay $X per HIV infection averted • Survey agency collects and reports HIV prevalence data using mutually agreed measurement methods • Donor commissions independent audit of measured output • Donor pays recipient according to achievement of previously negotiated output performance goals • E.g. $X per HIV infections averted • Government can spend money on ANYTHING (roads, football fields?) • Operational or impact evaluation research is strongly encouraged Source: Birdsall&Savedoff (2010) http://www.cgdev.org/section/initiatives/_active/codaid

  5. Can it work in the health sector?Consider Maternal Mortality: • Maternal mortality is a primary target for Millennium Development Goal 5 Problem is the many health risks are rare: • In 2008, between 302,000 and 394,000 women died from maternal causes in LDCs (Hogan and others, 2010) • Compares to about 2,000,000 new HIV infections, of which perhaps two/thirds are among women

  6. Four Opportunities to capture salient eventsfor an individual woman and her foetus

  7. 1. National Pregnancy Registration(Pilot in a district or region)

  8. 2. National Birth Regency(Piloted in the same district or region as the preganancy registration)

  9. 3. Survey of Previously Registered Pregnant Women

  10. 4. Survey of Random Sample of All Householdsin Region or District of Pregnancy & Birth Registrations

  11. Four Opportunities to capture salient eventsfor an individual woman and her foetus

  12. Opportunities to capture salient eventsfor an individual woman and her foetus

  13. Simulate the number of women in each compartment over time

  14. Next steps … • Use simulation model to explore sensitivity and specificity of various combinations of the four methods. • Propose possible sample contracts

  15. www.CGDev.org

More Related