450 likes | 465 Views
This survey conducted in 2005 provides insights into the definition, types, consequences, and causes of corruption. It also offers recommendations for combating corruption in the public sector. The findings highlight the need for cultural and social, political, and institutional solutions to effectively address this issue.
E N D
Results of a 2005 Worldwide SurveyICGFM 2005 Annual ConferenceMarriott Biscayne Hotel – Miami FloridaMonday 2 May, 2005 Presented by: Dick Willett – Grant Thornton LLP
Table of Contents • About the Survey • Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences • Causes of Corruption • Recommendations for Combating Corruption - Overall • Selected Specific Corruption-Resistant Recommendations • Closing Thoughts
About the Survey • Why we did it • What were we looking for • Not evidence of corruption – know it's there • Rather, ways to resist corruption in Public Sector • Particularly in financial management • Methodology • Anecdotal – reporting what we have heard from respondents • No statistically-based findings/conclusions • Scope • WB, TI work • Gathered info from respondents • Anonymity
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences • UNDP Definition Corruption is the misuse of public power, office or authority for private benefit-through bribery, extortion, influence peddling, nepotism, fraud, speed money or embezzlement. • Some interviewees wanted to add "benefit of certain groups or a political party"
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences (Cont'd) High Level – Generally causes more impact and to larger segment of citizens per respondents • Collusion • Misuse of public power • Irregularities • Bribery • Forged papers • Ignoring and undervaluing
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences (Cont'd) Retail – Less impact and causes isolated effects • Small-scale everyday graft, extortion and bribery involving low-level public sector employees • Examples of bribery • Police overlooking traffic violations • School officials enrolling students • Bureaucrats speeding-up the processing of permits
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences (Cont'd) Consequences of corruption as defined by respondents • Negative culture - public indifference to corruption is greatest barrier • General public lives with the contradictions – against it, but accept it • Slows economic development which inflicts more impact on poor • Widens the income gap between rich and poor • Lax collection results in lower revenues which affects public services
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences (Cont'd) • Ineffective administrations because officials are appointed based on their agreeing to engage in corrupt activities • Unfair competition and bribery prevents entrepreneurship and foreign investment • Public health is endangered because of poor protection (food, water)
Fraud and Corruption – Definition, Types and Consequences (Cont'd) • Contradictions - people are against it but they accept it “In my country, we have to destroy corruption definitively because it is destroying us.”
Causes of Corruption • Cultural and social • Political • Institutional
Causes of Corruption (Cont'd) Cultural and Social Causes • Major cause – indifference or acceptance by public sector officials • People know justice system will not punish corruptors Corruption is in all levels of society, politics and institutions
Causes of Corruption (Cont'd) Political Causes • Politicians and senior government officials say they are against corruption, but accept it • Political leaders lose power if they speak against corruption • Complete politicization of anti-corruption bodies and public prosecutors has made them ineffective
Causes of Corruption (Cont'd) Institutional Causes – respondents said • Minor problems with corruption among lower employees • Pay below poverty level leads some to corruption • Even if salaries rise, corruption continues • Lax enforcement of laws is a cause • Negligence attributed to entire justice system
Recommendations for Combating Corruption • Cultural and social • Political • Institutional
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) • Survey respondents made dozens of recommendations about what governments can do to reduce corruption and its impact on citizens, society and institutions • Our experience is that most countries with severe, endemic corruption will need to develop a comprehensive anti-corruption initiative that takes into account nearly all of these recommendations
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) Cultural and Social Solutions • Fight against corruption has to happen openly and with people involved • It is important to educate citizens on the value of a corruption-free society
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) Political Solutions • Political reform is absolutely essential to combat corruption • Reviewing and strengthening existing laws and monitoring their enforcement are key • Laws protecting people who report corruption, especially public servants (e.g., “whistleblower” laws), are particularly important
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) Institutional Solutions • Large number of respondents said establishing/ strengthening an anti-corruption board is an important step • Personnel rotation will help prevent concealing of illegal transactions • Regular evaluations of anti-corruption policies and procedures will help keep them effective
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) Institutional Solutions • Effective laws to protect whistleblowers and improve reporting should be in place • This reporting is better, as one respondent said, “We should be hearing about corruption that way, rather than at the dinner table”
Recommendations for Combating Corruption (Cont'd) Institutional Solutions • Strengthening internal controls at public entities - with particular emphasis on those that prevent fraud and abuse - is important • Internal controls is a priority involving revenue collections, procurement and financial transactions
Selected Specific Corruption–Resistant Recommendations Respondents prioritized intervention areas • Strengthen anti-corruption boards • Introduce effective revenue collections • Adopt transparent procurement process • Reducing corruption on little things means a lot
Procurement That Resists Corruption • Migrate manual to electronic process • Takes unneeded discretion out of process • Provided transaction-by-transaction audit trail
Procurement That Resists Corruption (Cont'd) • Centralize procurement • Facilitate bulk pricing, gain the benefits of specialized procurement employees • Reduce the opportunities for kickbacks and other corruption • Develop results-oriented specifications instead of spelling out the process of producing and delivering products and services • Broadly publish bid solicitations and awards, including on the Internet, to make the procurement process more transparent and trustworthy to vendors
Procurement That Resists Corruption (Cont'd) • Ensure that all vendors have full access to information they need to prepare bids, including special conditions and requirements, the procurement process to be used, and the government’s estimated budget range for each procurement • For frequently purchased items, use pre-approved vendors with negotiated catalog rates • Prepare and use clear, well-understood signoff procedures for bid evaluations and purchase transactions • For complex acquisitions, engage objective experts to determine specifications and expected pricing, and also participate in approving deliverables
Procurement That Resists Corruption (Cont'd) • Use this information to draft pre-proposal specifications and invite comments from potential bidders • Provide for prompt and objective bid protests, perhaps by a government-wide procurement board, especially when losing bidders allege arbitrary decisions • Have a person or organization not directly associated with a specific purchase monitor its delivery for meeting timeliness, quality and quantity requirements • Routinely evaluate vendors’ performance and establish and update a database of their performance “grades”
Characteristics of Effective Anti-Corruption Boards/Commissions
Characteristics of Effective Anti-Corruption Boards/Commissions • Independence/Management • Truly independent – not part of other organization • "Virtual fourth brand of government" • Freedom to follow any leads worthy of use of its resources • Single strong leader with assured lengthy tenure • Controls to avoid political or bureaucratic "witch-hunts"
Characteristics of Effective Anti-Corruption Boards/Commissions (Cont'd) Resources • Ample staff and budget – pursue leads without delay • Fair wages • Well-educated staff • Good working relationship with public media • Appropriate physical safety
Characteristics of Effective Anti-Corruption Boards/Commissions (Cont'd) Supporting Laws/Regulations • Needed to establish board • Needed to show country's willingness to support board activities • Governance reforms may be needed to create framework for defining corruption and protecting those practicing it
Little Things Mean a Lot • Daily encounters between the general public and public employees are the most frequent opportunities for corruption - and for reducing a country’s “culture of corruption” • Here are six areas respondents mentioned frequently
Little Things Mean a Lot (Cont'd) • Traffic and parking • Electronic payments • Outsourcing • Tax payments • Queues • Courtesy
Closing Thoughts • Respondents affirmed corruption is rampant • Corruption is now a topic being openly addressed – by government officials, media and general public • Respondents provided significant illustrations of ways to reduce corruption
Additional Information If you would like more copies of this survey or an opportunity to hear more about its content and about reducing public sector corruption, please contact ICGFM or Grant Thornton. We will be pleased to discuss providing your organization with a briefing or to present survey results at a conference or seminar.
To Contact Us International Consortium of Government Financial Managers 444 North Capital Street, Suite 234 Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 624-8461 Fax: (202) 624-5473 Email: ICGFM@yahoo.com Grant Thornton LLP 333 John Carlyle Street, Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 22314 Telephone: (703) 837-4400 Web: www.grantthornton.com/public sector Dick Willett Grant Thornton LLP 333 John Carlyle Street, Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 22314 Telephone: (703) 837-4444 Email: Dick.Willett@gt.com