1 / 20

Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring

Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring. 12 April 2007 @ ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK). Introduction. We have performed simulations on the fast-ion beam instabilities in ILC damping ring.

zenia-chang
Download Presentation

Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April 2007 @ ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)

  2. Introduction • We have performed simulations on the fast-ion beam instabilities in ILC damping ring. • We investigated the effects of various different bunch filling patterns, vacuum pressures and feedback system on the fast-ion instabilities. • Damping ring lattice is included in the simulations.

  3. Simulation method (1) • Weak-Strong model - Ions (weak) and beams (strong) are expressed by macroparticles and point charges, respectively. - Barycenter motion in beams is only investigated. • Interactions between a bunch and ions are considered by Bassetti-Erskine formula. • We assume that CO ions exist in the ring and use 1/6 part of the entire ring lattice for the simulations. • Ions are generated at locations that all magnetic components and drift spaces exist. (Ionization in long drift space is examined by every 2 m.) • All electron beams are initially set to zero displacement.

  4. Simulation method (2) • New macroparticles are generated at the transverse position (x,x´,y,y´) of beam where ionization occurs. • Incoherent behaviors of ions are obtained by our simulation, but that of the beams, such as emittance growth, can not be computed. • We compute the time evolution of the growth of the dipole amplitude of the beam, where the amplitude is half of the Courant-Snyder invariant Jy = (gy y2 + 2ay y y´ + by y´2)/2 .

  5. Simulation method (3) ILC damping ring has a circumference of 6.6 km and trains of 61 to 123, depending on the filling patterns, exist in the ring. for the fast simulations One bunch train and 1/6 section of the whole lattice are included for the simulations.

  6. Main parameters of the damping ring Circumference 6.69 km Energy 5 GeV Arc cell type TME Horizontal tune 52.397 Vertical tune 49.305 Natural chromaticity -63, -62 Momentum compaction factor 4.2 x 10-4 Energy loss/turn 8.69 MeV Transverse damping time 25.7 ms Longitudinal damping time 12.9 ms Norm. emittance 5.04 mm Natural energy spread 1.28 x 10-3 RF frequency 650 MHz Synchrotron tune 0.0958 RF acceptance 2.7 %

  7. Filling patterns of the damping ring Case A B C D E Bunch spacing / bucket Number of train Bunch per train / bucket Gap between trains / bucket Bunch per train / bucket Gap between trains / bucket Kb : Time between injection/extraction kicker pulses

  8. Filling patterns of the damping ring(One example) nb=2 f1=3 f2=4 f2 bunches in f2xnbbuckets f1bunches in f1xnbbuckets g2=5 g1=5 g2 buckets g1 buckets kb=24 24 buckets Distance between kicker pulses (pattern of kb buckets repeated p times) p=1

  9. Lattice used in the simulations ~1/6 of the entire ring

  10. Vertical amplitudes in different filling patterns 0.23 nT Case C shows the fastest exponential growth time. 10

  11. Vertical amplitudes in different filling patterns 0.23 nT feedback per 50 turns 11

  12. Vertical amplitudes vs. vacuum pressures nb=2 f1=49 ~ ~ f1 bunches in f1xnbbuckets g1=25

  13. Growth times vs. vacuum pressures

  14. Vertical amplitudes vs. feedback number 0.23 nT Case A

  15. Vertical amplitudes vs. bunch intensity 0.23 nT

  16. Different bunch spacing in a bunch train (Same total bunch charge) bunch spacing (nb) =2 0.97x1010/bunch 25 empty buckets ~ ~ bunch spacing (nb) =4 1.94x1010/bunch 25 empty buckets ~ ~ bunch spacing (nb) =8 3.88x1010/bunch 25 empty buckets ~ ~

  17. Different bunch spacing in a bunch train (Same total bunch charge) 0.23 nT No feedback in Case A

  18. One and two trains with same number of bunches Case A 25 empty buckets 49 bunches in a train ~ 12 empty buckets 12 empty buckets 25 bunches in a train 24 bunches in a train has electrons of 0.97x1010 per bunch. empty bucket. 18

  19. One and two train with same number of bunches damping by gap between trains 0.23 nT No feedback

  20. Summary • We performed weak-strong simulations to show aspects on the bunch filling patterns of the fast-ion instability in the ILCDR. • The simulation results show that bunch by bunch feedback of ~ 50 turns is enough to suppress the fast-ion instability. • We still need more simulation works to understand fully characteristics, in particular of the filling patterns, of the fast-ion instabilities in the ILC DR.

More Related