120 likes | 240 Views
Dealing with External Challenges in the Compilation of National Accounts: The Dutch Response. Peter van de Ven Head of National Accounts Statistics Netherlands. Major External Developments. Ongoing Budgetary Cutbacks 30% since 1999 Pressure to Decrease Respondent Burden
E N D
Dealing with External Challenges in the Compilation of National Accounts: The Dutch Response Peter van de Ven Head of National Accounts Statistics Netherlands
Major External Developments • Ongoing Budgetary Cutbacks • 30% since 1999 • Pressure to Decrease Respondent Burden • 60% in the period 1994-2002 • 25% in the period 2002-2006 • Ongoing Demands • Growing Availability of Register Data • Legal obligation (2004): no surveys possible if register data is available • Free access to administrations • Legal possiblities to match data files
Major External Developments • Globalisation • Inconsistencies between statistics • Delineation of national economy • Growing Mobility of Personnel • Transparency and Reproducibility • Growing IT-possibilities • User Demands • Focus on short term statistics • Multi-dimensional policy issues • Quickly changing needs for information • Growing administrative use of NA-data
Redesign of Economic Statistics • Integrated architecture + chain management: clearly defined ”resting points” in processing of data, from Business Register to NA • Production Statistics: • Mainly driven by administrative registers (VAT-register and Register on employment and wages) => Note: Observation unit and matching • Restricted surveying of additional data: • Very limited annual survey (10-20 questions?) • Rolling review of input structure (once every 3-5 years?) • ProdCom
Redesign of Economic Statistics • Separate processing of large and/or complex enterprises (250-500 enterprises?) • Integrated compilation of Structural Business Statistics (SBS) and Supply and Use Tables (SUT), based on: • Before-mentioned data • Data on government and financial corporations • Data on imports and final uses
Redesign of NA (General Issues) • NA: clearly defined set of tasks based on ”resting points” • Translation to NA-concepts • Exhaustiveness • Integration of source data • Three (more internally oriented) projects: • Less Detailed SUT: from 260 * 850 => 150 * 500 • Dashboard • ”Quarter-machine”
Redesign of NA (Dashboard) • Software system for prioritising inconsistencies and implausibilities • Based on predefined set of norms and standards • After solving major inconsistencies: automatic balancing • Goal: more top-down, less bottom-up; more efficient processing • At the moment: iterative process of implementation
Redesign of NA (Quarter-machine) • Software system for: • Benchmarking quarterly data to annual data • Compiling annual estimates, based on quarterly NA-data plus newly available source data • Use of Denton Techniques • Relevant for the whole core-system of NA: SUT, Institutional Sector Accounts (ISA) and Labour Accounts (LA) • Complete change in focus, from annual to quarterly data
Revision policy: now versus future • Present revision policy: • T+45 days: flash quarterly economic growth and employment • T+90 days: (revised) quarterly estimates for SUT, ISA and LA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- • T+6 months: 1st provisional (autonomous) annual estimate • T+18 months: 2nd provisional (autonomous) annual estimate • T+30 months: definite (autonomous) annual estimate
Revision policy: now versus future • Future revision policy: • T+45 days: flash quarterly economic growth and employment • T+90 days: (revised) quarterly estimates for SUT, ISA and LA • T+6 months: 1st annual estimate based on sum of 4 quarters plus newly available source data • T+18 months: 2nd annual estimate based on sum of 4 quarters plus newly available source data ---------------------------------------------------------------------- • T+30 months: definite (autonomous) annual estimate
Redesign (of NA): main goals • More efficient system • Less respondent burden • More transparent and reproducible system • Better quality, or at least no loss of quality: • Consistent recording of large enterprises • Full exploitation of register data • More top-down, less bottom-up • Improved ability to cope with mobility of personnel • Note: still a lot of work and problems ahead!
Some concluding remarks • More international co-operation: • Exchange of best practices • Development of software tools for NA-compilation • ... • ...