1 / 30

Molecular Bonding

Molecular Schr ödinger equation. r - nuclei s - electrons. M j = mass of j th nucleus m 0 = mass of electron. Coulomb potential. electron-electron nuclear-nuclear electron-nuclear repulsion repulsion attraction. Molecular Bonding. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007.

zev
Download Presentation

Molecular Bonding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Molecular Schrödinger equation r - nucleis - electrons Mj = mass of jth nucleusm0 = mass of electron Coulomb potential electron-electronnuclear-nuclearelectron-nuclearrepulsionrepulsion attraction Molecular Bonding Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  2. Born-Oppenheimer Approximation Electrons very light relative to nuclei they move very fast. In the time it takes nuclei to change position a significant amount, electrons have “traveled their full paths.” Therefore, Fix nuclei - calculate electronic eigenfunctions and energy for fixed nuclear positions. Then move nuclei, and do it again.The resulting curve is the energy as a function of internuclear separation. If there is a minimum – bond formation. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  3. 1) Not exact2) Good approximation for many problems3) Many important effects are due to the “break down” of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Born-Oppenheimer ApproximationSeparation of total Schrödinger equation into anelectronic equation and anuclear equationis obtained by expanding the total Schrödinger equation in powers of M – average nuclear mass, m0 - electron mass. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  4. Born-Oppenheimer Approximate wavefunction electronic nuclearcoordinatescoordinates nuclear wavefunctiondepends on electronicquantum number, n andnuclear quantum number, n electronic wavefunctiondepends on electronicquantum number, n Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  5. Electronic wavefunction depends on fixed nuclear coordinates, g. Obtained by solving “electronic Schrödinger equation” for fixed nuclear positions, g.No nuclear kinetic energy term. The energy depends on the nuclear coordinates and the electronic quantum number. The potential function complete potential function forfixed nuclear coordinates. Solve, change nuclear coordinates, solve again. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  6. Solve electronic wave equation Nuclear Schrödinger equation becomes - the electronic energy as a function of nuclear coordinates, g, acts as the potential function. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  7. With interaction of magnitude g The matrix elements are Before examining the hydrogen molecule ion and the hydrogen moleculeneed to discuss matrix diagonalization with non-orthogonal basis set. Two states orthonormal No interaction States have same energy: Degenerate Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  8. Energy Eigenvalues Eigenvectors Hamiltonian Matrix Matrix diagonalization - form secular determinant Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  9. This represents a system of equations only has solution if Matrix Formulation - Orthonormal Basis Set eigenvalues vector representative of eigenvector Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  10. system of equations only has solution if ( ) - a - D a - D a × × × a ( a ) ( a ) 11 12 12 13 13 ( ) - D a - a - D a × × × ( a ) a ( a ) 21 21 22 23 23 ( ) - D a - D a - a ( a ) ( a ) a 31 31 32 32 33 = 0 × × × × × × Basis Set Not Orthogonal overlap Basis vectors not orthogonal In Schrödinger representation Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  11. For a 2×2 matrix with non-orthogonal basis set E eigenvaluesD overlap integral D 0, recover standard 2×2 determinant for orthogonal basis. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  12. e r r A B + + H H A r B A B Hydrogen Molecule Ion - Ground State A simple treatment Born-Oppenheimer Approximation electronic Schrödinger equation - refers to electron coordinates electron kinetic energy Have multiplied through by Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  13. Energy Ground state wavefunctions Either H atom at A in 1s state or H atom at B in 1s state and degenerate Large nuclear separations rAB System looks like H atom and H+ ion Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  14. and Form 2×2 Hamiltonian matrix and corresponding secular determinant. E eigenvaluesD overlap integral Suggests simple treatment involvingas basis functions not orthogonal Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  15. Energies and Eigenfunctions S - symmetric (+ sign) A - antisymmetric (- sign) Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  16. Part of H looks like Hydrogen atom Hamiltonian These terms operating on can be set equal to ,EH - energy of 1s state of H atom. Evaluation of Matrix Elements Need HAA, HAB, and D Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  17. Then (Coulomb Integral) distance in units of the Bohr radius Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  18. J - Coulomb integral - interaction of electron in 1s orbital around A with a proton at B.K - Exchange integral – exchange (resonance) of electron between the two nuclei. (Again collecting terms equal to the H atom Hamiltonian.) (Exchange integral) (K is a negative number) Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  19. Also consider Classical - no exchangeInteraction of hydrogen 1s electron charge distribution at A with a proton (point charge) at B. Electron fixed on A. These results yield (K is a negative number) The essential difference between these is the sign of the exchangeintegral, K. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  20. -0.8 -0.9 E A E N -1.0 E S -1.1 -1.2 4 0 2 6 8 10 r AB a o classical – no exchange repulsive at all distancesanti-bonding M.O. H 1s energy De bonding M.O. D = - equilibrium bond length De - dissociation energy Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  21. Dissociation Energy Equilibrium Distance De This Calc. 1.77 eV (36%) 1.32 Å (25%) Exp. 2.78 eV 1.06 Å Variationin Z' 2.25 eV (19%) 1.06 Å (0%) Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  22. - e 2 r 1 2 - e 1 r A 2 r B 2 r A 1 r B 1 + + H H r A B A B Hydrogen Molecule In Born-Oppenheimer Approximation the electronic Schrödinger equation is Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  23. , system goes to 2 hydrogen atoms Use product wavefunction as basis functions These are degenerate. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  24. Form Hamiltonian Matrix secular determinant Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  25. Diagonalization yields S - symmetric orbital wavefunctionA - antisymmetric orbital wavefunction Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  26. J same as before. Evaluating attraction to nuclei nuclear-nuclearrepulsion Two kinetic energy terms and two electron-nuclear attraction terms comprise 2 H atom Hamiltonians. electron-electron repulsion Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  27. K and D same as before. Ei - integral logarithmmath tables, approx., see book. (Euler's constant) Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  28. J and K - same physical meaning as before. J - Coulomb integral. Attraction of electron around one nucleus for the other nucleus.K - Corresponding exchange integral. J' - Coulomb integral. Interaction of electron in 1s orbital on nucleus A with electron in 1s orbital on nucleus B.K' - Corresponding exchange or resonance integral. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  29. Energy of No exchange.Classical interaction of spherical H atom charge distributions.Charge distribution about H atoms A and B.Electron 1 stays on A.Electron 2 stays on B. Putting the pieces together K' is negative. The essential differencebetween these is the signof the K' term. Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

  30. classical – no exchange -1.6 repulsive at all distancesanti-bonding M.O. -1.7 E -1.8 A -1.9 2 × H 1s energy -2 E ö ÷ ø N o De a -2.1 o 2 e E pe bonding M.O. S 8 -2.2 æ ç è E -2.3 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 r D = AB a o Dissociation Energy Equilibrium Distance De This Calc. 3.14 eV (33%) 0.80 Å (8%) Exp. 4.72 eV 0.74 Å Variationin Z' 3.76 eV (19%) 0.76 Å (3%) Vibrational Frequency - fit to parabola, 3400 cm-1; exp, 4318 cm-1 Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007

More Related