180 likes | 315 Views
Social Behavior Hermits must have lower fitness than social individuals Clumped, random, or dispersed (variance/mean ratio) mobility = motility = vagility (sedentary sessile organisms).
E N D
Social Behavior Hermits must have lower fitness than social individuals Clumped, random, or dispersed (variance/mean ratio) mobility = motility = vagility (sedentary sessile organisms)
Social Behavior Use of Space Philopatry Fluid versus Viscous Populations Coarse-grained versus fine-grained utilization Individual Distance, Daily Movements Home Range Territoriality (economic defendability) Resource in short supply Feeding Territories Nesting Territories Mating Territories
Net Benefit ^
Sexual ReproductionMonoecious versus Diecious Evolution of Sex —> Anisogamy Diploidy as a “fail-safe” mechanism Costs of Sexual Reproduction (halves heritability!) Facultative Sexuality (Ursula LeGuin -- Left Hand of Darkness) Protandry -- Protogyny (Social control) Parthenogenesis (unisexual species) Possible advantages of sexual reproduction include: two parents can raise twice as many progeny mix genes with desirable genes (enhances fitness) reduced sibling competition heterozygosity biparental origin of many unisexual species
Protandry—> Sexual ReproductionMonoecious versus Diecious Evolution of Sex —> Anisogamy Diploidy as a “fail-safe” mechanism Costs of Sexual Reproduction (halves heritability!) Facultative Sexuality (Ursula LeGuin -- Left Hand of Darkness) Protandry -- Protogyny (Social control) Parthenogenesis (unisexual species) Possible advantages of sexual reproduction include: two parents can raise twice as many progeny mix genes with desirable genes (enhances fitness) reduced sibling competition heterozygosity biparental origin of many unisexual species Protogyny—>
Why have males? “The biological advantage of a sex ratio that is unbalanced in favor of females is readily apparent in a species with a promiscuous mating system. Since one male could fertilize several females under such a system, survival of a number of males equal to the number of females would be wasteful of food, home sites, and other requirements for existence. The contribution of some of the surplus males to feeding the predators on the population would be economically advantageous. In other words, the eating of the less valuable (to the population) males by predators would tend to reduce the predator pressure on the more valuable females.” — Blair (1960) The Rusty Lizard W. Frank Blair
Sex Ratio Proportion of Males Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Quaternary Equilibrium sex ratio Fisher’s theory: equal investment in the two sexes Ronald Fisher
Comparison of the Contribution to Future Generations of Various Families in Case a in Populations with Different Sex Ratios __________________________________________________________________ Case a Number of Males Number of Females __________________________________________________________________ Initial population 100 100 Family A 4 0 Family C 2 2 Subsequent population (sum) 106 102 CA = 4/106 = 0.03773 CC = 2/106 + 2/102 = 0.03846 (family C has a higher reproductive success) __________________________________________________________________ Note: The contribution of family x is designated Cx.
Comparison of the Contribution to Future Generations of Various Families in Case a in Populations with Different Sex Ratios __________________________________________________________________ Case a Number of Males Number of Females __________________________________________________________________ Initial population 100 100 Family E 0 4 Family C 2 2 Subsequent population (sum) 102 106 CE = 4/106 = 0.03773 CC = 2/106 + 2/102 = 0.03846 (family C has a higher reproductive success) __________________________________________________________________ Note: The contribution of family x is designated Cx.
Comparison of the Contribution to Future Generations of Various Families in Case a in Populations with Different Sex Ratios __________________________________________________________________ Case a Number of Males Number of Females __________________________________________________________________ Initial population 100 100 Family A 4 0 Family C 2 2 Family E 0 4 Subsequent population (sum) 106 106 CA = 4/106 = 0.03773 CC = 2/106 + 2/106 = 0.03773 All three families have equal success CE = 4/106 = 0.03773 __________________________________________________________________ Note: The contribution of family x is designated Cx.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Case b Number of Males Number of Females ____________________________________________________________________________ Initial population 100 100 Family A 2 0 Family B 1 2 Subsequent population (sum) 103 102 CA = 2/103 = 0.01942 CB = 1/103 + 2/102 = 0.02932 (family B is more successful) Initial population 100 100 Family B 1 2 Family C 0 4 Subsequent population (sum) 101 106 CB = 1/101 + 2/106 = 0.02877 CC = 4/106 = 0.03773 (family C is more successful than family B) Natural selection will favor families with an excess of females until the population reaches its equilibrium sex ratio (below). Initial population 100 200 Family B 1 2 Family C 0 4 Subsequent population (sum) 101 206 CB = 1/101 + 2/206 = 0.001971 CC = 4/206 = 0.01942 (family B now has the advantage) _____________________________________________________________________________ Note: The contribution of family x is designated Cx.
Differential Mortality of the sexes during the period of parental care.
Differential Mortality of the sexes during the period of parental care.
Evolution of Sex : Isogamy —> Anisogamy Sexual reproduction halves heritability, offsetting factors Diploidy as a backup system Simultaneous vs. sequential hermaphroditism Monecious vs Diecious, Protandry, Protogyny Why have males? Fisher’s theory of sex ratio, equal parental investment Heterozygosity Biparental origin of many unisexual species
Sexual Selection Mating Preferences Sex that invests the most is the most choosy about mates Competition for the best mates of the opposite sex Jealousy, Desertion, Cuckoldry Certainty of Maternity, Uncertainty of Paternity Epigamic selection (intersexual, between the sexes)“Battle of the sexes” Natural selection produces a correlation between male genetic quality and female preference“Sexy son” phenomenon (females cannot afford to mate with males that are not attractive to other females)