340 likes | 511 Views
An information infrastructure for vegetation science. Robert K. Peet for the Ecological Society of America Vegetation Classification Panel. ESA Vegetation Panel. Founded in 1995 to Foster collaboration among federal, NGO and academic communities. Develop standards.
E N D
An information infrastructure for vegetation science • Robert K. Peet • for the • Ecological Society of America Vegetation Classification Panel
ESA Vegetation Panel Founded in 1995 to • Foster collaboration among federal, NGO and academic communities. • Develop standards. • Increase credibility through a process of peer review and formal publication. Primary funding provided by GAP.
Partner Organizations 1999 MOU • Ecological Society of America • Role: to develop and implement professional standards, including peer review, for vegetationdocumentation and classification. • NatureServe • Role: to develop, support & maintain • a standard vegetation classification • for conservation, inventory, and monitoring.
Partner Organizations • FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee • Role: to establish standards within the federal community for vegetation data and vegetation classification units. • USGS – NBII • Role: to “make the NVC system, and its associated data and information products, broadly accessible by incorporating them in the NBII federation.”
A Federal Standard • The “National Vegetation Classification” adopted as a federal standard in 1997 following ESA Panel review. • Finest-scale floristic classification based on quantitative field data was adopted only in concept with the process left unspecified.
ESA Guidelines • The ESA Vegetation Panel and its partners have developed guidelines for the floristic levels of the classification covering: • Vegetation field plots • (Classification plots & EO plots), • Documentation & description of floristic types. • Submission & peer review of proposed types. • Management, citation, & archiving of data (including XML schemas).
Guidelines for describing the associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. The Ecological Society of America Vegetation Classification Panel. Version 4.0. July, 2004 http://www.esa.org/vegweb/ Under review by FGDC as a U.S. federal standard
US-NVC: Proposed data flow Legend External Action Internal Action Software Entity Public view of NVC Classification Mgt. NVC Proceedings US-NVC Panel Peer Review Proposal to revise Analysis & Synthesis Public plot archives Taxonomic database
vegbank.org natureserve.org TBA plants.usda.gov Overview of online resources Stores plots & makes them publicly accessible Stores NVC community descriptions Allows people/organizations to propose changes in the NVC Stores current plant taxonomy
VegBank • The ESA Vegetation Panel is developing a public archive for vegetation plots known as VegBank (http://vegbank.org). • VegBank is expected to function for vegetation plot data in a manner analogous to GenBank. • Primary data will be archived for • - Documentation & citation • - Discovery & access • - Analysis
VegBank applications • Vegetation classification • Vegetation occurrence (EO) • Vegetation/taxon monitoring & resurvey • High-quality ground truth points • Species presence & absence for modeling • Community assembly • Ecological attributes of taxa • Indicator taxa for taxa/communities
http://vegbank.org/get/std/observation/VB.Ob.26013.027020404
http://vegbank.org/vegbank/views/userdataset_constancyanalysis.jsp?view=constancyanalysis&wparam=197079&entity=userdataset¶ms=197079http://vegbank.org/vegbank/views/userdataset_constancyanalysis.jsp?view=constancyanalysis&wparam=197079&entity=userdataset¶ms=197079
VegBank data are open access • All data in VegBank are freely available to the public (except for embargoed location data). • Key data can be viewed by a simple web link. (http://vegbank.org/get/std/observation/5153,5906)
VegBranch Access database • Free download from VegBank • Data entry tools & forms • Local plot database system • Legacy data migration tools • Automated export to VegBank • Easy import from VegBank
Taxonomic database challenge:Standardizing organisms and communities The problem:Integration of data potentially representing different times, places, investigators and taxonomic standards. The traditional solution:A standard list of organisms / communities.
Standardized taxon lists fail • to allow dataset integration • The reasons include: • The user cannot reconstruct the database as viewed at an arbitrary time in the past, • Taxonomic concepts are not defined (just lists), • Multiple party perspectives on taxonomic concepts and names cannot be supported or reconciled.
High-elevation fir trees of western North America AZ NM CO WY MT AB eBC wBC WA OR Distribution Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa USDA - ITIS Abies bifolia Abies lasiocarpa Flora North America Will the real Abies lasiocarpa please stand up?
Andropogon virginicus complex in the Carolinas More ugly: 9 elemental units; 17 base concepts
Toward concept-based taxonomy • VegBank provides concept-based taxonomy and dataset resolution. • VegBank aims to provide an initial set of concept relationships for use by USDA PLANTS and ITIS.
Public access to the NVC • NatureServe Explorer • VegBank
T Note Link
NVC Peer Review • Goal • The NVC must be open in the sense that any person (independently or representing some institution) is free to submit proposed revisions. • The rules, standards, and opportunities must be the same for all potential contributors. • Process • NVC Peer Review Board – oversight • Several Regional Editorial Boards
Concluding remarks • VegBank, the NVC Proceedings, and the NVC Revision System are being used to test and demonstrate implementation strategies for the proposed FGDC Vegetation Standards. • The ESA Vegetation Panel looks foreword to continued collaboration with its partner organizations (GAP, FGDC, NatureServe, and NBII) in the advancement of an open US National Vegetation Classification.
Ecological Society of America National Science Foundation Gap Analysis Program National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis National Biological Information Infrastructure Federal Geographic Data Committee We are pleased to acknowledge the support and cooperation of