1 / 34

Particle emission in hydrodynamic picture of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions

Particle emission in hydrodynamic picture of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions. Yu. Karpenko Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics and Kiev National Taras Shevchenko University

zoey
Download Presentation

Particle emission in hydrodynamic picture of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Particle emission in hydrodynamic picture of ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Karpenko Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics and Kiev National Taras Shevchenko University M.S. Borysova, Yu.M.Sinyukov, S.V.Akkelin, B.Erazmus, Iu.A.Karpenko, nucl-th/0507057 (to be published in Phys. Rev. C), Yu.M. Sinyukov, Iu.A. Karpenko, nucl-th/0505041, nucl-th/0506002 (to be published in HIP)

  2. Picture of evolution

  3. Picture of evolution Hadronization QGP and hydro Initial state Freeze-out Pre-equilibrated state Kpnd,

  4. Hydro model • (Ideal) hydrodynamics ideal fluid : + EoS p=p(ε) + initial conditions • Cooper-Frye prescription : Sudden transition from local equilibrium to free streaming at some hypersurface 

  5. Continuous emission Attempt to account nonzero emission time : (Blast-wave, Buda-Lund, …) Emission function “smeared” in  : • No x-t correlations : at early times – only surface emission! • Emission function is not proportional to the l.eq. distribution function (Sinyukov et.al. PRL 2002)

  6. Freeze-out Continuous emission Enclosed freeze-out hypersurface, containing : • Space-like sectors • Non-space-like sectors

  7. The idea of interferometry measurements p1 CF=1+cos qx|f(x,p) x1 f(x,p)  x2 2 p2 2R0 1/R0 q =p1- p2 , x = x1- x2 |q| 1

  8. “General” parameterization at |q|  0 Podgoretsky’83, Bertsch-Pratt’95 Particles on mass shell & azimuthal symmetry  5 variables: q = {qx , qy , qz}  {qout , qside , qlong}, pair velocity v = {vx,0,vz} q0 = qp/p0 qv = qxvx+ qzvz y  side x  out transverse pair velocity vt z  long beam cos qx=1-½ (qx)2…exp(-Rx2qx2 –Ry2qy2-Rz2qz2) Ri - Interferometry radii:

  9. Ro/Rs Using gaussian approximation of CFs (q0), where In the Bertsch-Pratt frame • Long emission time results in positive contribution to Ro/Rs ratio • Positive rout-tcorrelations give negative contribution to Ro/Rs ratio Experimental data : Ro/Rs1

  10. To describe Ro/Rs ratio with protracted particle emission, one needs positive rout-t correlations

  11. The model of continuous emission (M.S.Borysova, Yu.M. Sinyukov, S.V.Akkelin, B.Erazmus, Iu.A.Karpenko, nucl-th/0507057, to be published in Phys. Rev. C) volume emission Induces space-time correlations for emission points surface emission

  12. Cooper-Frye prescription Simplest modification of CFp (for non-space-like f.o. hypersurface): (Sinyukov, Bugaev) Excludes particles that reenter the system crossing the outer side of surface in Cooper-Frye picture of emission.

  13. Results : spectra

  14. Results : interferometry radii

  15. Results : Ro/Rs

  16. Relativistic ideal hydrodynamics ideal fluid : + EoS p=p(ε) + (additional equations depicting charge conservation)

  17. New hydro solution The new class of analytic (3+1) hydro solutions (Yu.M.Sinyukov, Yu.A.Karpenko, nucl-th/0505041, nucl-th/0506002 - to be published in HIP) For “soft” EoS, p=p0=const Satisfies the condition of accelerationless : (quasi-inertial flows similar to Hwa/Bjorken and Hubble ones).

  18. New hydro solution Is a generalization of known Hubble flow and Hwa/Bjorken solution with cs=0 :

  19. Thermodynamical relations Density profile for energy and quantum number (particle number, if it conserves): with corresponding initial conditions. Chemically equilibrated evolution Chemically frozen case for particle number

  20. Dynamical realization of freeze-out paramerization. • Particular solution for energy density: System is a finite in the transverse direction and is an approximately boost-invariant in the long- direction at freeze-out.

  21. Freeze-out conditions • Impose a freeze-out at constant total energy density, andpresume that this HS is confined in a space-time 4-volume which belongs to the region of applicability of our solution with constant pressure.

  22. Dynamical realization of enclosed f.o. hypersurface Geometry : Rt,max Rt,0 decreases with rapidity increase. No exact boost invariance!

  23. Thermodynamics Chemical potentials (T) for each particle sort Smoothly decreases on t :

  24. Observables from the latter calculations : spectra

  25. Observables from the latter calculations : interferometry radii

  26. Observables from the latter calculations : Ro/Rs ratio

  27. Numerical hydro testing (T. Hirano, arXiv : nucl-th/0108004)

  28. Conclusions • The continuous hadronic emission in A+A collisions can be taken into account by the (generalized) Cooper-Frye prescription for enclosed freeze-out hypersurface. • The phenomenological parameterization for enclosed hypersurface with positive (t-r) correlations can be reproduced by applying natural freeze-out criteria to the new exact solution of relativistic hydrodynamics. • The proton, pion an kaon single particle momentum spectra and pion HBT radii in central RHIC s=200 GeV Au+Au collisions are reproduced with physically reasonable set of the parameters that is similar in both approaches.

  29. Conclusions • Successful description of data needs protracted hadronic emission (9 fm/c) from “surface” sector of the freeze-out hypersurface, and initial flows in transverse direction. • The fitting temperature is about 110 MeV on the “volume” part of hypersurface and 130-150 MeV on the “surface” part.

  30. Thank you for your attention

  31. Extra slides

  32. Known relativistic hydro solutions Hubble flow spherical symmetry Hwa/Bjorken solution longitudinal boost invariance Biró solution longitudinal boost invariance, cylindrical symmetry

  33. Kinetic description & sudden freeze-out • Duality in hydro-kinetic approach to A+A collisions (S.V. Akkelin, M.S. Borysova, Yu.M. Sinyukov, HIP, 2005) • Evolution of observables in a numerical kinetic model(N.S. Amelin, R. Lednicky, L.I. Malinina, Yu.M. Sinyukov, Phys.Rev.C); Yu.M.Sinyukov, proc. ISMD2005 & WPCF 2005

More Related