1 / 24

Labour activism and the reform of trade unions in Russia, China and Vietnam

Labour activism and the reform of trade unions in Russia, China and Vietnam. Simon Clarke and Tim Pringle University of Warwick. State socialist trade unions. Integral part of Party-state apparatus Primary functions to maintain labour discipline, encourage the production drive

zofia
Download Presentation

Labour activism and the reform of trade unions in Russia, China and Vietnam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Labour activism and the reform oftrade unions in Russia, China and Vietnam Simon Clarke and Tim Pringle University of Warwick

  2. State socialist trade unions • Integral part of Party-state apparatus • Primary functions • to maintain labour discipline, • encourage the production drive • administer state social welfare system • Protective functions • Represent individual worker in disputes • Monitor enforcement of labour law

  3. Socialist market economy • Dualism: state-owned and private sector • Decentralisation of SOE management • Ambiguous role of unions • Unitary interest of enterprise (STK, WC) • Represent interests of workers • Aspirations to independence • Worker activism directed against state • China: post-Tiananmen crackdown • Russia: collapse of soviet system

  4. Transition to capitalism • Transformed environment of trade unions • state no longer determines terms and conditions • employment relation transformed to contract • New industrial relations framework • Contrasting political status of unions • Workplace unions still management dominated • Little internal pressure for union change

  5. Russian unions • Collapse of soviet system threatened survival of traditional unions • State needed the traditional unions • To administer traditional state functions • To channel and contain social unrest • Social partnership • Economic collapse demobilises workers • Activism confined to state sector, collusion with employers

  6. Social Partnership • Partnerly relations with state and employer • Tripartite commission • Lobbying legislature and executive • Branch and regional agreements • Collective agreements • Dispute resolution • Negotiated settlement • Judicial resolution of disputes

  7. Trade unions and worker activism • Trade unions channel conflict into symbolic protests and bureaucratic representation of worker interests • Weakness of unions is management dominance of primary organisations: still function as part of personnel department • Workplace militancy harnessed by small alternative unions

  8. Revitalisation of workplace unions • Post-1998 economic and political stabilisation reduce political leverage of unions • Traditional unions have to revitalise workplace unions to establish legitimacy • Limited leverage over workplace unions • Constrained by commitment to social peace • Limited to servicing role: training, legal advice, lobbying, branch and regional agreements • Minimal organising: few members in new private sector

  9. The challenge of alternative unions • Competition fosters revitalisation • Improved collective agreements • Support for individual disputes • Some collaboration with alternative unions • Mostly via ICFTU/ITUC and GUFs • Suppression of alternative unions • 2001 Labour Code • Collaboration with management victimisation • Alternative unions in terminal? decline

  10. Best practice of traditional unions • Political representation of worker interests • Lobbying legislatures • Collaboration with state bureaucracy • Judicial representation • Facilitates negotiated resolution of individual and collective disputes • Collective bargaining • Sectoral and regional agreements set minimum terms • Genuine bargaining in booming sectors: energy, metallurgy

  11. China and Vietnam • Unions under the leadership of the Party • No freedom of association • Restricted right to strike • China abolished in 1982 • Vietnam from 1994, only after mediation and arbitration, called by union, supported by majority of labour force, no legal strikes • ‘Illegal’ strikes pervasive and growing, limited repression

  12. Changes in employment relations • Large lay-offs from SOEs – privatisation • Transition from permanent to contractual employment • Transition from state welfare to social insurance • Massive growth of private and foreign-owned enterprises • Employing migrant workers on low wages, short or no contracts, long hours, poor health and safety

  13. Trade unions and the Party • Not mere puppets of the Party, unions have a powerful voice in the Party • Party has greater interest in reform of the unions than do the unions themselves • Party requires unions • To extend organisation to POEs and FIEs • To prevent strikes and social unrest • By mediating between worker and employer • And channelling disputes into bureaucratic and judicial channels

  14. Collective agreements • ACFTU very active in promoting collective agreements, VGCL less so • Most collective agreements contain little beyond that provided by law • Terms largely dictated by management • Few sanctions for violation • Union can play consultative role, esp in SOEs • Some more effective collective agreements, especially in JVs

  15. Judicial resolution of disputes • Baseline terms and conditions set by labour law • Mediation, arbitration stacked against workers, moribund in Vietnam • Massive growth in court actions in China • Strikes and protests reveal legal violations • Legal advice centres: NGOs and ACFTU • Indicate ineffectiveness of workplace trade union in monitoring employer legal violations • Buck passing between union and MoL

  16. Reform of workplace unions • Controlled by management • Recognised as a problem, but • Higher union bodies have little leverage • Fear of loss of control • And provoking conflict • Support for collective bargaining • Trade union elections • Professionalisation of union

  17. Trade union organising • Trade unions traditionally confined to state and collective enterprises • Pressure from Party to extend organisation to POE, FIE and migrant workers • Legal requirement to have a trade union • Mostly bureaucratic process, always top-down • Some rare exceptions, e.g. Wal-Mart • Sectoral/local unions for SMEs

  18. SOE worker activism • SOE workers lost jobs, security and social and economic status • Protest contained/repressed early 1990s • China: laid-off workers protest escalated, peaking in 2002 – met with repression • State response: early pensions, xiagang, employment creation • ACFTU priority to job creation over wages

  19. Strikes and protests • Increasingly migrant workers in POEs and FIEs • Strengthened by labour shortage • Fire-fighting role of state and tu • Confine strike to one enterprise • From repression to concession – ‘collective bargaining by riot’ • Labour bureau persuades employer to concede • Trade union persuades workers to return to work • Usually establish a trade union branch by agreement with management • Severe repression of organising beyond one enterprise

  20. Worker activism and union reform • Worker activism has defined role of trade unions of maintaining political stability • By diverting protest into bureaucratic and judicial channels • Key is reform of workplace unions • Limited by management control, limited leverage and resources of higher levels • Compounded by fear of loss of control, encouraging activism

  21. Trade unions and the Party-state • Unions in transition from state body to NGO • Party control • Imposes pressure on unions to reform to contain worker activism • But confines reform within strict limits, impedes reform of workplace unions • Union reform much more advanced in China than in Vietnam: greater political fear? • Prevents unions from mobilising politically

  22. Freedom of Association • Gives workers capacity to by-pass management-dominated union • Provides competition for traditional unions • Traditional unions have ample resources to contain the alternative threat • Significant as a force for change rather than as replacement of traditional unions

  23. Right to Strike • Issue is not is a strike legal, but is it effective • China and Vietnam: very effective in meeting workers’ immediate demands • Not effective as a means of building workers’ organisational solidarity because of absence of freedom of association

  24. Post-socialist trade unions • Driving force of reform has been development of capitalist relations of production • Mediated by worker unrest • Need for trade unions to take on new roles, reinforced by anxieties of Party-state • Trade union reform confined within limits of social stabilisation • Main barrier to reform is inertia of apparatus and dependence of workplace union on management • Freedom of association critical factor • International collaboration has played an important role in Russia, limited possibilities in China and Vietnam • There is progress but it is very slow

More Related