440 likes | 640 Views
The Measurement of Organizational Performance. Performance is measured in all addiction treatment settingsHow helpful is performance data?Does data drive organizational vision?Does data drive organizational decision-making?. The Limitations of Outcomes. A thermometer reading would be of no value as a measure of your health
E N D
1. Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment 2009 SAAS National Conference/
NIATx Summit
Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D.
July 30, 2009
2. The Measurement of Organizational Performance Performance is measured in all addiction treatment settings
How helpful is performance data?
Does data drive organizational vision?
Does data drive organizational decision-making?
3. The Limitations of Outcomes A thermometer reading would be of no value as a measure of your health…
If you didn't know that 98.6 is the “average” temperature!
4. The Limitations of Outcomes in Your Organization Similarly, knowing that your missed appointment rate is 27% is of little value in evaluating the health of your agency…if you don’t know how others are performing
5. Data without Meaning We are deluged with data without meaning
Data without a context is just a bunch of numbers
What is the answer?
6. The Role of Benchmarking Benchmarks provide the vital external context for understanding your outcomes
7. Benchmarking Defined Gift and Mosel (1994) define benchmarking as “the continual and collaborative discipline of measuring and comparing the results of key work processes”
Gift, R. and Mosel, D. (1994). Benchmarking in Health Care, American Hospital Association
8. A Tiered Model of Benchmarking Descriptive Benchmarking
Comparative Benchmarking
Process Benchmarking
Each builds on the preceding type
9. Descriptive Benchmarking Most common form of benchmarking
Industry overviews, government reports
Static snapshot of industry performance
No formal or statistical comparisons between an organization’s performance and industry norms
“Eyeball analysis” can be misleading
10. Comparative Benchmarking Formal comparison of an organization’s performance against a descriptive benchmark
Typically reported as percentile rankings but can be reported in graph form also
11. The Importance of Formal Comparative Benchmarks
12. Comparative Benchmarking in Your Daily Life What examples of comparative benchmarking have you encountered in your own day-to-day activities?
13. Important Benchmarking Concepts Benchmarking differs from formalized research or laboratory science
Benchmarking views data as a vehicle rather than a destination
Benchmarking generates ideas and hypotheses---not answers
Benchmarking is a communal activity
14. Benchmarking as an Impetus to Action Human nature gives benchmarked data its power
Raw data tells no stories
Benchmarked data draws comparisons
Nobody wants to “bring up the rear”
Benchmarked data prompts action
15. The Limitations of Benchmarking Benchmarks profile your organization against others and help identify opportunities for improvement
16. Improve? How? Benchmarks do not give any indication as to how to improve
17. The “How”: Process Benchmarking Based on a simple premise: The methods of top performers differ from those of others
Process benchmarking systematically compares tactics of top performers with those of others
Methods that distinguish between top performers and others may be regarded as potential best practices
18. Process Benchmarking Methodology Typically performed in workshop settings
Guide to Participation distributed in advance to allow participants to respond to questions that will be posed about methods used
Audience polling technology used to permit anonymous involvement and immediate analysis of data
20. Surprises Abound
What is expected usually does not materialize
Top performers do not know why they perform well
Subtle factors often prove to be powerful
21. ProcessBenchmarking In Action
The identification of “best practices”
22. Internal Benchmarking All concepts also apply to internal benchmarking
Descriptive, comparative or process benchmarking can be conducted within an organization
Examples of internal comparative benchmarks:
Productivity differences among staff
Access differences among locations
Unit cost differences among programs
Staff satisfaction differences among leaders
23. Benchmarks: Where are They? Readily accessible, relevant and affordable comparative benchmarking data is hard to come by
24. Benchmarking for Organizational Excellence in Addiction Treatment SAAS, NIATx, and Behavioral Pathway Systems are partnering to sponsor an addiction-specific national benchmarking initiative
BPS specializes in behavioral health and human services benchmarking and has numerous state and national benchmarking initiatives underway
25. Objectives of Benchmarking Initiative Provide SAAS with information it needs to advocate for its members
Provide participating organizations with individualized comparative benchmark data that can serve as a vital context for understanding measured outcomes
Provide a powerful vehicle for the identification of best practices and organizational improvement through process benchmarking and the application of NIATx principles
26. Benchmark Selection Process National interest survey conducted
Interest
Availability of Data
354 respondents
Survey findings guided Steering Committee decisions
27. Scope of Benchmarks Comprehensive range of benchmarks
Operational, clinical, organizational climate, and financial domains of performance
21 benchmark dimensions
Approximately 150 input metrics
28. Operational Benchmarks Initial Access
Length of Stay/Utilization, by Level of Care
Subsequent Access (Number of days from intake to first treatment appt)
Average Caseload Size of Clinician, by Level of Care
Outpatient Productivity
Average Group Size
29. Clinical Benchmarks Engagement/Retention, by Level of Care
Outpatient No-Show/Cancellation Rates
Client Satisfaction/Perceptions of Care
Degree of Engagement with Recovery Support Services
Involvement of Significant Others
30. Organizational Climate Staff Retention/Turn-Over
Staff Morale/Satisfaction (Measure and scoring to be provided)
Percent of Staff Position Vacancies (Counselors)
31. Financial Benchmarks Cost per Unit of Service, by Level of Care
Salaries, by Role
Administrative Overhead as a Percent of Total Expenses
Payer Mix
Current Ratio (Assets Divided by Liabilities)
Net Days in Accounts Receivable
Days of Cash on Hand
32. Data Submission On-line benchmarking survey
Aggregated anonymous data-no complicated encounter-level data
No software needed
User-friendly, encrypted and secure
Available 24/7
Submit relevant and available data--no reporting requirements
State-of-the-art on-line data validation
33. BenchmarkingReports Standard Report
Executive Summary Report
Organizational Climate Report
Run Charts
34. Standard Benchmarking Report Normative Data
Sample Size
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Comparative Data
Overall Percentile Rankings
Peer Group Comparisons (budget size, geographic area, setting) “Apples to Apples”
Previous Scores
35. Standard Benchmarking Report
36. Executive Summary Report Designed for busy senior leaders and boards
Graphic representation of scores
Brief, key highlights
37. Executive Summary Report
38. Executive Summary Report II
39. Run Chart Track your data over time
Trend analysis
Examine interplay among different benchmarking dimensions
40. Run Chart
41. Accommodations for Multiple Locations Satellite locations easily accommodated
Each location can be benchmarked independently to produce a separate report
No limit to number of additional locations
42. Moving Beyond “the Numbers” Benchmarking is not just about data
When data is generated, real fun begins
Identify potential best practices through process benchmarking and other vehicles
Enhance organizational performance through NIATx principles
Emphasis on shared learning from one another and from “top performers”
A learning community
43. Shared Activities and Available Resources Monthly audio-conferences/user support meetings
Monthly newsletter to educate and inform
Telephonic and E-Mail user support
Free telephonic consultation in interpreting your data and developing improvement strategies
Articles and other resources
44. One Year Subscription Fee Annual Subscription Fee: $1,000-includes all aspects of initiative
Conference Special for those that sign-up on site-$900
45. Questions? Contact:
Paul M. Lefkovitz, Ph.D.
President, Behavioral Pathway Systems
877-330-9870 (Toll-Free)
plefk@bpsys.org
www.bpsys.org
BPS is Booth #33 in the Exhibit Hall